wow..... he's only 3 matches away from immortality.. impressive win.
-- "if federal judges have the final word over its meaning, the Constitution would be a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they please".
"StephenJ" <c20@setyrtfj.77com> wrote in message news:nylme.4969$%Z2.87@lakeread08...> wow..... he's only 3 matches away from immortality.. impressive win.
Nice win, but not impressive. Moya was a pretty lame duck today because of his shoulder, and the match never really took off. I am not even sure Fed would have been happy with his form, as he made quite a lot of basic errors. Still, it's difficult to get up for a strange, flat match like this, and the main thing is that he is through. And no Nalbadian in the next round either.
Erich wrote:> "StephenJ" <c20@setyrtfj.77com> wrote in message> news:nylme.4969$%Z2.87@lakeread08...>
wow..... he's only 3 matches away from immortality.. impressive win.>
Nice win, but not impressive. Moya was a pretty lame duck today because of> his shoulder, and the match never really took off. I am not even sure Fed> would have been happy with his form, as he made quite a lot of basic errors.> Still, it's difficult to get up for a strange, flat match like this, and the> main thing is that he is through. And no Nalbadian in the next round either.>
Come now, you are not pulling the Federer-rules-yah-boo line. Surely this is the greatest victory in the history of tennis.The fact Moya well was in agony with his shoulder, barely able to serve, seems irrelevant to Fedophants.
"StephenJ" <c20@setyrtfj.77com> wrote in message>> news:nylme.4969$%Z2.87@lakeread08...>>
wow..... he's only 3 matches away from immortality.. impressive win.>>
Nice win, but not impressive. Moya was a pretty lame duck today >> because of>> his shoulder, and the match never really took off. I am not even sure Fed>> would have been happy with his form, as he made quite a lot of basic >> errors.>> Still, it's difficult to get up for a strange, flat match like this, >> and the>> main thing is that he is through. And no Nalbadian in the next round >> either.>>
Come now, you are not pulling the Federer-rules-yah-boo line. Surely > this is the greatest victory in the history of tennis.The fact Moya well > was in agony with his shoulder, barely able to serve, seems irrelevant > to Fedophants.
Please point to a post where anyone has said anything remotely like that. Parody must be based in some reality ...
"StephenJ" <c20@setyrtfj.77com> wrote in message>>>news:nylme.4969$%Z2.87@lakeread08...>>>
wow..... he's only 3 matches away from immortality.. impressive win.>>>
Nice win, but not impressive. Moya was a pretty lame duck today because of>>>his shoulder, and the match never really took off. I am not even sure Fed>>>would have been happy with his form, as he made quite a lot of basic errors.>>>Still, it's difficult to get up for a strange, flat match like this, and the>>>main thing is that he is through. And no Nalbadian in the next round either.>>>
Come now, you are not pulling the Federer-rules-yah-boo line. Surely>>this is the greatest victory in the history of tennis.The fact Moya well>>was in agony with his shoulder, barely able to serve, seems irrelevant>>to Fedophants.>
But he looks pretty invincible atm, doesn't he?>
Invincible against chumps and injured players...sure.
Come now, you are not pulling the Federer-rules-yah-boo line. Surely> this is the greatest victory in the history of tennis.The fact Moya well> was in agony with his shoulder, barely able to serve, seems irrelevant> to Fedophants.
We're not all biased idiots like yourself, groundfog.
Come now, you are not pulling the Federer-rules-yah-boo line. Surely> > > this is the greatest victory in the history of tennis.The fact Moya
well> > > was in agony with his shoulder, barely able to serve, seems irrelevant> > > to Fedophants.> >
We're not all biased idiots like yourself, groundfog.>
This Dr Groundaxe is taking a big risk in suggesting that Fed won't win> a slam this year.>
A big risk to his credibility.
His credibility has already gone out the window. First he predicted Fed wouldn't even win a MS title this year, and then he suddenly thought he would sweep them all!?!?!
"Roberts" <artsmark10@mail.com> wrote in message news:1117396990.007070.240530@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...>
Erich wrote:> > > > > Come now, you are not pulling the Federer-rules-yah-boo line.
Surely> > > > > this is the greatest victory in the history of tennis.The fact Moya> > well> > > > > was in agony with his shoulder, barely able to serve, seems irrelevant> > > > > to Fedophants.> > > >
We're not all biased idiots like yourself, groundfog.> > >
This Dr Groundaxe is taking a big risk in suggesting that Fed won't
a slam this year.> > >
A big risk to his credibility.> >
His credibility has already gone out the window. First he predicted Fed> > wouldn't even win a MS title this year, and then he suddenly thought he> > would sweep them all!?!?!>
Do you think he'll disappear from RST if Fed wins FO?
Come now, you are not pulling the Federer-rules-yah-boo line. Surely>>>this is the greatest victory in the history of tennis.The fact Moya well>>>was in agony with his shoulder, barely able to serve, seems irrelevant>>>to Fedophants.>>
We're not all biased idiots like yourself, groundfog.>
This Dr Groundaxe is taking a big risk in suggesting that Fed won't win> a slam this year. >
A big risk to his credibility.>
Nadal can certainly beat Fed at FO, so Fed would feel more pressure at Wimbledon. Someone like Ancic can get hot & get Fed down a couple sets, then he'll be going into USO slamless....
