-- "if federal judges have the final word over its meaning, the Constitution would be a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they please".
yes, hanescu only had 8 fewer winners, 64 to 56 for naldoobian, so your description rings true....
-- "if federal judges have the final word over its meaning, the Constitution would be a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they please".
Sometimes playing it safe is the right thing to do.
No doubt. The player's job is to win, however he can. But as a spectator, i'm entitled to comment on the entertainment value .............
-- "if federal judges have the final word over its meaning, the Constitution would be a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they please".
Sometimes playing it safe is the right thing to do. If my opponent is
making> > error after error, and there's 50K euros on the line (not to mention 100> > entry ranking points), I'm playing however I need to to win the match.> >
Yes, just don't expect any spectators....
Oh. That explains why no one is in the stands in Paris, and ITF is considering eliminating the French for 2006.
