Re: In praise of Roddick and old-fashioned Sportsmanship
Only Human 13 May 2005 06:30:37
Oh please. all Duck boy did was save the umpire from getting up and seeing the same mark. and Roddick did this when he had trippple match point. thats not being a sportsman. you do it when your down in a match. not up. this is so ridiculous.
"only human" <surfer989@webtv.net> wrote in message news:20359-4284114D-7@storefull-3118.bay.webtv.net...> Oh please. all Duck boy did was save the umpire from getting up and> seeing the same mark. and Roddick did this when he had trippple match> point. thats not being a sportsman. you do it when your down in a match.> not up. this is so ridiculous.>
Must be so upsetting to see someone you hate show a great act of SPORTSMANSHIP.
"only human" <surfer989@webtv.net> wrote in message news:21982-42842C05-306@storefull-3117.bay.webtv.net...> Like your opinion here means anything Trellek aka Troll>
I watched the match, you didn't. Therefore my opinion means more than yours.
Wrong Trellek. i saw it on the tennis channel live. Duck boy did nothing special. he was up tripple match point for christ sakes when it happened. you can bet your life he wouldn't have bothered to do anything if he thought it woud cost him the match. Duck boy doesn't do that.
"Vari L. Cinicke" <cinicke@netscape.net> wrote in message >>
Ducks are cool, eh? Not from cricket country, I see.>
I am actually (Australia). But I can't stand cricket. >
National manias and interminable test matches can do that, I suppose. I find that I am able to tolerate cricket just fine as long as I only read about it. Participatory cricket is almost as bad as watching cricket unless you are batting or bowling.
