What is an Ignore list?
Roger was down 4-1 in the 3rd set. not the 4th set
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• GYXU
  • Ñîîáùåñòâà
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Register!

GYXU > Tennis > Roger was down 4-1 in the 3rd set. not the 4th set 5 April 2005 00:30:49

  Recent blog posts: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Ìîäåðàòîð:

Roger was down 4-1 in the 3rd set. not the 4th set

Guest 4 April 2005 02:50:06
 Some here keep saying it was the 4th set.
it was the 3rd set. this makes his comeback even more impressive since
Nadal took the 1st 2 sets. this was a huge task since Nadal was still
fresh at this stage in the match . Roger had to come up with some pretty
clever stuff to pull this match out. Roger even predicted before the
match that he may need to comeback from a set and a break down to get
used to Nadal's left handed play.

Add comment
Paperw8 4 April 2005 03:12:31 permanent link ]
 seles-fan@webtv.net wrote:>
Some here keep saying it was the 4th set.> it was the 3rd set. this makes his comeback even more impressive since> Nadal took the 1st 2 sets. this was a huge task since Nadal was still> fresh at this stage in the match . Roger had to come up with some pretty> clever stuff to pull this match out. Roger even predicted before the> match that he may need to comeback from a set and a break down to get> used to Nadal's left handed play.>

being down 1-4 in a set may not be as impressive as it sounds. the 1-4
deficit was due to a single service break. nadal served first in the
set.
Add comment
Guest 4 April 2005 04:50:19 permanent link ]
 Hello paperw8. just what the hell does it take for a tennis player to do
to impress you? you friggin twit. Roger lost the 1st 2 sets. he was down
4-1 in the 3rd set. it takes a very special player to get out of that.
and end up winning the remaining sets. Roger is that player.

Add comment
Tiger 4 April 2005 07:47:45 permanent link ]
 nadal was playing awsome..
first guy in a long time to push fedex to the limit..


"Roberts" <artsmark10@mail.co­m> wrote in message
news:1112569305.775­396.180270@o13g2000c­wo.googlegroups.com.­..>
seles-...@webtv.net­ wrote:> > Some here keep saying it was the 4th set.>
Well they are wrong, Fed nearly lost...very nearly.>


Add comment
Luke Tang 4 April 2005 08:41:32 permanent link ]
 It seems that everyone has the belief that he will win
a slam one day. Look at any professional comments
of this match....

<wkhedr@my-deja.com­> wrote in message
news:1112586958.337­561.200620@o13g2000c­wo.googlegroups.com.­..> Nadal runs great, very physical, don't know if he has the brain to win> a slam!>


Add comment
Whisper 4 April 2005 12:45:59 permanent link ]
 paperw8 wrote:
seles-fan@webtv.net­ wrote:>
Some here keep saying it was the 4th set.>>it was the 3rd set. this makes his comeback even more impressive since>>Nadal took the 1st 2 sets. this was a huge task since Nadal was still>>fresh at this stage in the match . Roger had to come up with some pretty>>clever stuff to pull this match out. Roger even predicted before the>>match that he may need to comeback from a set and a break down to get>>used to Nadal's left handed play.>>
being down 1-4 in a set may not be as impressive as it sounds. the 1-4> deficit was due to a single service break. nadal served first in the> set.


In the context of also being down 2 sets to love it's a pretty big hole.
Cred to Fed for hanging in (not the same as a slam, but good
practice), but Nadal may have some sort of mental weakness in these type
of matches (eg same thing v Hewitt at AO). It's like he's proven he can
thump you & then kind of gives up a little at the finishing line....?

He should be a big shot at FO.
Add comment
Whisper 4 April 2005 13:00:40 permanent link ]
 seles-fan@webtv.net wrote:
Hello paperw8. just what the hell does it take for a tennis player to do> to impress you? you friggin twit. Roger lost the 1st 2 sets. he was down> 4-1 in the 3rd set. it takes a very special player to get out of that.> and end up winning the remaining sets. Roger is that player.>


Yes, Benz is a twit.

..& yes to the other bit.

Add comment
Whisper 4 April 2005 13:12:06 permanent link ]
 Luke Tang wrote:
It seems that everyone has the belief that he will win> a slam one day. Look at any professional comments> of this match....




He'll win a few.
Add comment
Guest 4 April 2005 13:54:02 permanent link ]
 In article <BN24e.893586$6l.15­8938@pd7tw2no>, marc.goris@advalvas­.be
(Tiger) wrote:
nadal was playing awsome..> first guy in a long time to push fedex to the limit..

Since the semifinals of the AO?

wg
Add comment
Pedro Dias 4 April 2005 19:17:27 permanent link ]
 
"Whisper" <beaver999@ozemail.­com.au> wrote in message
news:Cx74e.372$GR2.­4035@nnrp1.ozemail.c­om.au...> Luke Tang wrote:>
It seems that everyone has the belief that he will win> > a slam one day. Look at any professional comments> > of this match....>
He'll win a few.

Federer/Nadal/Safin­ equate with Sampras/Agassi/Ivan­isevic? Sloppy shorthand,
of course, but I see some parallels.


Add comment
Jimbo 4 April 2005 19:46:58 permanent link ]
 Absolutely right

That is what champions are made of.

Jim


<seles-fan@webtv.ne­t> wrote in message
news:5145-42508F4B-­115@storefull-3112.b­ay.webtv.net...> Hello paperw8. just what the hell does it take for a tennis player to do> to impress you? you friggin twit. Roger lost the 1st 2 sets. he was down> 4-1 in the 3rd set. it takes a very special player to get out of that.> and end up winning the remaining sets. Roger is that player.>


Add comment
Jimbo 4 April 2005 19:47:49 permanent link ]
 don't forget the kid is only 18 !

Jim


"Whisper" <beaver999@ozemail.­com.au> wrote in message
news:7974e.350$GR2.­3272@nnrp1.ozemail.c­om.au...> paperw8 wrote:>
seles-fan@webtv.net­ wrote:>>
Some here keep saying it was the 4th set.>>>it was the 3rd set. this makes his comeback even more impressive since>>>Nadal took the 1st 2 sets. this was a huge task since Nadal was still>>>fresh at this stage in the match . Roger had to come up with some pretty>>>clever stuff to pull this match out. Roger even predicted before the>>>match that he may need to comeback from a set and a break down to get>>>used to Nadal's left handed play.>>>
being down 1-4 in a set may not be as impressive as it sounds. the 1-4>> deficit was due to a single service break. nadal served first in the>> set.>
In the context of also being down 2 sets to love it's a pretty big hole. > Cred to Fed for hanging in (not the same as a slam, but good practice), > but Nadal may have some sort of mental weakness in these type of matches > (eg same thing v Hewitt at AO). It's like he's proven he can thump you & > then kind of gives up a little at the finishing line....?>
He should be a big shot at FO.


Add comment
Whisper 5 April 2005 00:30:49 permanent link ]
 Pedro Dias wrote:
"Whisper" <beaver999@ozemail.­com.au> wrote in message> news:Cx74e.372$GR2.­4035@nnrp1.ozemail.c­om.au...>
Luke Tang wrote:>>
It seems that everyone has the belief that he will win>>>a slam one day. Look at any professional comments>>>of this match....>>
He'll win a few.>
Federer/Nadal/Safin­ equate with Sampras/Agassi/Ivan­isevic? Sloppy shorthand,> of course, but I see some parallels.>


Not bad.
Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
respect your talk pals, avoid using obscene language, typing entire messages in CAPS, posting buy/sell ads or violating netiquette or the RF Criminal Code..


GYXU > Tennis > Roger was down 4-1 in the 3rd set. not the 4th set 5 April 2005 00:30:49

see also:
Re: Humor in time for the lighted boat…
pass tests:
see also:

  Copyright © 2001—2009 GYXU
Idea: Miñhael Monashev
See Help and FAQ in the community support.gyxu.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.gyxu.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.gyxu.com.
Information for parents.
Write us at:
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .