Watching the matter as an external casual observer, I do believe that the prediction of the Guardian's editor is probabily a bit exhagerated. Any other comment?
-- ale http://www.sen.it et corruptissima re pubblica plurimae leges
Watching the matter as an external casual observer, I do believe that> the prediction of the Guardian's editor is probabily a bit> exhagerated. Any other comment?
That's not an "editor", that's Steven "Seething" Wells, whose stock-in-trade is being wildly over the top. He's more Hunter S Thompson than New York Times, which is to say.
Watching the matter as an external casual observer, I do believe
that> > the prediction of the Guardian's editor is probabily a bit> > exhagerated. Any other comment?>
That's not an "editor", that's Steven "Seething" Wells, whose> stock-in-trade is being wildly over the top. He's more Hunter S> Thompson than New York Times, which is to say.
Or, to put it another way, he is to the Guardian what Joel Stein (in his Q&A mode) is to Time magazine.