"Uncle Dave" <davidcovey@t-online.de> wrote in message news:1113904829.358756.306510@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...> Of course, you know when *he's* beaten because he starts using the word> "troll" quite indiscriminately. On the whole, I find it's easier to> agree with Rick because he can be such a pain if you don't. As you> know.>
So I'm happy to agree with Rick on this occasion.>
What was the question again?>
The proof of the pudding is the fact that we now use the term 'Boydian' to describe desperate, implausible calculations to prove that your team is unbeatable. Tbh, I don't know why he bothers, Oz aren't doing that badly.
If you want a name for it, the nearest one I can think of is Liza Minnelli.
Of course, you know when *he's* beaten because he starts using the word> "troll" quite indiscriminately. On the whole, I find it's easier to> agree with Rick because he can be such a pain if you don't. As you> know.>
So I'm happy to agree with Rick on this occasion.>
What was the question again?>
UD
He's fine jusy don't mention the definition of a forward pass, 'World Champions', the fallability of the ABs, th.......
OK, that'll teach me to start a post without thinking where it might go.
Good. If you start dreaming of me, I'd be very concerned indeed if in> your shoes.>
"in your shoes" is n/a here. Patrick doesn't wear shoes since he received medical advice that they were causing him too much damage. Another dentist confirmed this.
I'm much more comfortable with the "defeated" form, and appreciated>> the difference. I was delighted you seemed to have moved on.>> If as often happens I'm mistaken and you made a slip changing words,>> never mind.>
Slip? Slip? What slip? I was merely using two different words to say the > same thing.>
One does not "move on" from accuracy.>
Neither can one "move on" from a place they haven't been.
