How can I avoid getting notifications to my own posts?
Subjective comments about the latest World Rugby Rankings
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• GYXU
  • Ñîîáùåñòâà
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Register!

GYXU > Rugby > Subjective comments about the latest World Rugby Rankings 2 November 2007 01:03:00

  Recent blog posts: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Ìîäåðàòîð:

Subjective comments about the latest World Rugby Rankings

Guest 1 March 2005 14:18:08
 Subjective comments about the latest World Rugby Rankings

The surprising first month of the Six Nations Championship
saw Ireland jump two places, to 4th in the rankings, following
its win over England. If Ireland can now go on to beat both
France and Wales, it will have - in the last year - beaten
all of the world's major teams except NZ and Australia, and
could move up to 2nd place in the rankings.

Wales, on the other hand, is perhaps a bit unlucky not to
gain in the rankings, following its wins over England and
France. However, last month's win over England was only the
first in the last six matches between them. Also, in recent
years Wales has consistently lost to South Africa - a team
that in turn has consistently lost to England.
Add comment
Guest 2 April 2005 01:42:22 permanent link ]
 Subjective comments about the latest World Rugby Rankings

The final rounds of the Six Nations Championship produced
no changes in the rankings. Wales supporters will
undoubtedly whine profusely about their team's failure to
advance in the rankings, despite beating England, France
and Ireland this year. As I explained last month, there
are two reasons why Wales failed to advance. First, their
win over England was only the first in the last six matches
between them. Also, in recent years, Wales has consistently
lost to South Africa - a team that in turn has consistently
lost to England.
Add comment
Rob Stradling 2 April 2005 15:09:43 permanent link ]
 finlayson@delete-thi­s.live.com wrote:> Wales supporters will> undoubtedly whine profusely about their team's failure to> advance in the rankings, despite beating England, France> and Ireland this year.

<ahem> and Argentina... :-)­

Of course we appreciate that this is a "weighted" scale. You have to
admit, though, that just at the moment, because of its refusal to react
to "sudden" movements, it looks a little silly. Of course Wales have
only beaten England and Ireland once each out of many recent attempts;
but if the three played each other every day for the next fortnight, few
observers would expect many English or Irish wins.

This system is not at its best during times of dramatic upheaval in the
status quo. Once the "new order" - if there is to be one - stabilises,
your system will start looking sensible and fair once more. Until then,
here's one Welsh fan who'll cut you some slack! :-)­
Add comment
Martyn Winters 3 April 2005 20:21:06 permanent link ]
 Rob Stradling wrote:> finlayson@delete-th­is.live.com wrote:>
Wales supporters will>> undoubtedly whine profusely about their team's failure to>> advance in the rankings, despite beating England, France>> and Ireland this year. >
<ahem> and Argentina... :-)­>
Of course we appreciate that this is a "weighted" scale. You have to > admit, though, that just at the moment, because of its refusal to react > to "sudden" movements, it looks a little silly. Of course Wales have > only beaten England and Ireland once each out of many recent attempts; > but if the three played each other every day for the next fortnight, few > observers would expect many English or Irish wins.>
This system is not at its best during times of dramatic upheaval in the > status quo. Once the "new order" - if there is to be one - stabilises, > your system will start looking sensible and fair once more. Until then, > here's one Welsh fan who'll cut you some slack! :-)­

Who cares about the rankings? Not this Welshman. As long as we go on
winning, I don't give a toss. Until we get to the top, then they'll be
the most important table in World Rugby. ;-)­
Add comment
John Williams 3 April 2005 21:09:00 permanent link ]
 On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 16:21:06 GMT, Martyn Winters
<ziggy.stardust@ntl­world.com> wrote:
Rob Stradling wrote:>> finlayson@delete-th­is.live.com wrote:
This system is not at its best during times of dramatic upheaval in the >> status quo. Once the "new order" - if there is to be one - stabilises, >> your system will start looking sensible and fair once more. Until then, >> here's one Welsh fan who'll cut you some slack! :-)­
Who cares about the rankings? Not this Welshman. As long as we go on >winning, I don't give a toss. Until we get to the top, then they'll be >the most important table in World Rugby. ;-)­

If we ask Ross nicely, he might plot a graph of the ratings over the
last few years, as he's done in the past? No surprises which team will
be the big dropper, and Wales might well be beginning to show a trend
upwards.

--

Regards,
John Williams
Add comment
Guest 4 May 2005 13:01:11 permanent link ]
 Subjective comments about the latest World Rugby Rankings

With the major nations quiet until June, our attention turns to the
countries
further down the table.

The biggest gainer last month was Belgium, following its victory over the
Netherlands. Serbia-Montenegro aldo gained, following its victory over
Malta.
Japan fell four places, following its loss to Uruguay.
Add comment
Guest 5 June 2006 11:30:50 permanent link ]
 Subjective comments about the latest World Rugby Rankings

With the major nations out of action again last month, all
of the action last month came from minor nations' World Cup
qualifying matches, plus some 'friendly' internationals
(such as Japan's win over Georgia, which caused Georgia to
drop three places in the rankings).

Other significant changes in the rankings came from Hong Kong's
win over Sri Lanka, Norway's win over Luxembourg, and Lithuania's
win over Hungary.

Paraguay has been removed from the rankings, because it
has not played enough games against other ranked teams
within the last four years.
Add comment
Charlie Pearce 5 June 2006 20:33:26 permanent link ]
 On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 07:30:50 GMT, finlayson@delete-th­is.live555.com
wrote:
Subjective comments about the latest World Rugby Rankings>
With the major nations out of action again last month, all>of the action last month came from minor nations' World Cup>qualifying matches, plus some 'friendly' internationals>(suc­h as Japan's win over Georgia, which caused Georgia to>drop three places in the rankings).>
Other significant changes in the rankings came from Hong Kong's>win over Sri Lanka, Norway's win over Luxembourg, and Lithuania's>win over Hungary.>
Paraguay has been removed from the rankings, because it>has not played enough games against other ranked teams>within the last four years.

What do Morocco have to do to get into the rankings? Going by the IRB
rankings they're set to qualify for RWC as Africa 1 if they beat
Namibia...

Charlie
--
Remove NO-SPOO-PLEASE from my email address to reply
Please send no unsolicited email or foodstuffs
Add comment
Guest 6 June 2006 13:35:12 permanent link ]
 
On 5-Jun-2006, Charlie Pearce
<charlie.pearce@eid­osnet.NO-SPOO-PLEASE­.co.uk> wrote:
What do Morocco have to do to get into the rankings?

See <http://wrr.live555­.com/about.html>

For a team to be ranked, it needs to have played, within the last four
years, a total of at least five matches against at least three
already-ranked teams.

(Currently, Morocco has played only 3 recent matches against just one
already-ranked team (Namibia).)

Ross.
Add comment
Guest 2 November 2006 16:27:35 permanent link ]
 Subjective comments about the latest World Rugby Rankings

The top-ranked teams were out of action last month; they return in
November. Instead, October saw several of the lower-ranked teams
competing (including, in some cases, World Cup qualifying matches).

Several teams dropped in the rankings last month, including
Russia (following its loss to Portugal), Armenia (following its
loss to Sweden; its win over Belgium two years ago was apparently
a fluke), and Bosnia (following its loss to Finland).
Add comment
Calvin 6 December 2006 04:00:30 permanent link ]
 
<finlayson@delete-t­his.live555.com> wrote in message
news:cI2dnWeB2JIxVO­jYnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@m­egapath.net...> Subjective comments about the latest World Rugby Rankings>
Noevember was a busy month, with the world's top 15 teams> (except for Fiji, Samoa and Tonga, which were combined as> the Pacific Islands) touring the Northern Hemisphere.

Is there any reason they can't be ranked?

cheers,
calvin


Add comment
Guest 2 November 2007 01:03:00 permanent link ]
 Subjective comments about the latest World Rugby Rankings

With its win over Argentina and England in the Rugby World Cup,
South Africa climbed to 2nd place in the rankings. Despite
losing to France, New Zealand retains its #1 ranking, because
NZ retains a time-weighted recent winning record against every
other opponent (including France). Despite losing to England
in the semi-finals, France remains above England in the
rankings, in part because of France's superior recent
performances against Ireland.
Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
respect your talk pals, avoid using obscene language, typing entire messages in CAPS, posting buy/sell ads or violating netiquette or the RF Criminal Code..


GYXU > Rugby > Subjective comments about the latest World Rugby Rankings 2 November 2007 01:03:00

see also:
Re: Sen(low)shi(ki) needs a better…
Gunnar Scott vs. Finlay
Re: POPBITCH 06/22 **BLIND ITEM**
pass tests:
see also:
UPJA4KA!!!
ONOTOLE NEGODUE

  Copyright © 2001—2009 GYXU
Idea: Miñhael Monashev
See Help and FAQ in the community support.gyxu.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.gyxu.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.gyxu.com.
Information for parents.
Write us at:
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .