How to avoid pre-moderation of my comments?
England - contact area play
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• GYXU
  • Ñîîáùåñòâà
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Register!

GYXU > Rugby > England - contact area play 28 February 2005 21:06:27

  Recent blog posts: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Ìîäåðàòîð:

England - contact area play

Tim Jesson 28 February 2005 02:17:54
 Does anyone have an opinion what is going wrong with the English recycling?

Just re-watching the recording of today's game I was surprised at a number
of things - but not the result and no whinges/excuses here :-)­

1) how little offloading there was before contact
2) how poor the support play was (probably leading to 1)
3) how poor the body angles often were when players attempted to drive the
tackler back (except Corry who drove low and protected the ball well)
4) the relatively good support and rucking of the backs compared to the
forwards (Lewsey should convert to 7!)

As a result of all this, there was no space and time for the backs to find
the right running lines to unlock the excellent irish defence. It was all
slow, static stuff.

I think this stuff is maybe a little over simplified, but I think it's the
basics that are looking bad.

Looking again at the recording, I felt a bit more sympathy for Ellis who was
constantly having to reach deep into a ruck through legs and feet to get bad
ball. I had initially thought that he was slow to get to the ball and
laboured in his pass - but he was no slouch around the park and the ball was
well and truly buried more often than not.

I also felt a bit more sympathy for the ref. If the speed of English ball
was all about Irish spoiling then it wasn't always easy to spot from the
camera. It just kind of got stuck in a half maul contact situation with the
player unable to quickly form a ruck by getting the ball to the deck. I did
think that some of the 'holding on' pings were wrong after the replay
though!

In contrast, the Irish were often going straight to ground and producing
much better ball as a result. There were a number of instances where the
ball carrier almost dived to the feet of the defender rather than take a
tackle. The pack run over the top of him and result? - fast sweet ball for
Stringer.

Back to basics for the English forwards?

Cheers,
TJ







Add comment
John Hill 28 February 2005 12:53:30 permanent link ]
 On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:17:54 -0000, "Tim Jesson"
<tim@nospamthanksth­ejessons.co.uk> wrote:
Does anyone have an opinion what is going wrong with the English recycling?>
Just re-watching the recording of today's game I was surprised at a number >of things - but not the result and no whinges/excuses here :-)­>
1) how little offloading there was before contact>2) how poor the support play was (probably leading to 1)>3) how poor the body angles often were when players attempted to drive the >tackler back (except Corry who drove low and protected the ball well)>4) the relatively good support and rucking of the backs compared to the >forwards (Lewsey should convert to 7!)


Lydon ?

JH
Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
respect your talk pals, avoid using obscene language, typing entire messages in CAPS, posting buy/sell ads or violating netiquette or the RF Criminal Code..


GYXU > Rugby > England - contact area play 28 February 2005 21:06:27

see also:
Villy has kis work cut out for him!
[OT - for Europeans] Le Mans…
pass tests:
see also:
http://demish.gyxu.com/i/temp/2/128...
...
...

  Copyright © 2001—2009 GYXU
Idea: Miñhael Monashev
See Help and FAQ in the community support.gyxu.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.gyxu.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.gyxu.com.
Information for parents.
Write us at:
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .