NOMINATION - Colonel Graff for Coward of the Month {Re: Ping FNVW(s)}
Sean Monaghan 3 May 2005 06:21:57
PJR wrote:
On Tuesday 03 May 2005, Gary L Burnore wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:>
On 3 May 2005 03:46:56 +0200, Major Imbu <Imbu@co1min.gov> wrote:> >
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler <graff@colmin.gov> wrote in > > > news:d56l03$get$1@domitilla.aioe.org:> > >
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in> >>> news:020520050811261779%art_deco@127.0.0.1: > >>>
A question about voting -- I've noticed at least two of what I> >>>> assume are protest ballots in which the voter has voted No or> NotA >>>> on every ballot item. Are these counted, or are they> rejected for >>>> reasons such as the AMMJ block voting rule? Just> curious; >>>> obviously it is possible for a block of kooks> (alt.astronomy or >>>> alt.snuh, for example) armed with socks to> outvote all Yes or >>>> candidate items by simply voting no on> everything >>> > >>> I will be doing the vote counting on the 8th. Be rest assured that> >>> there will not be any problems. > >>>
I am glad to hear there will be a proper vote count performed.> > >
The least you could do is use a different newsreader or something,> > k00k. Or how about a different fake .gov domain? >
I don't think I've seen a holier sock since Rusty's last one.
I officially nominate Colonel Graff for Coward of the Month.
Seconds?
--
Sean Monaghan http://www.Kookology.info Winner of the Pierre Salinger Memorial HL&S Award To e-mail me, change the zeros (00) to letters (oo) in my addy.
On 03 May 2005 02:21:57 GMT, "Sean Monaghan" <sean@k00kology.info> wrote:
PJR wrote:>
On Tuesday 03 May 2005, Gary L Burnore wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:>>
On 3 May 2005 03:46:56 +0200, Major Imbu <Imbu@co1min.gov> wrote:>> >
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler <graff@colmin.gov> wrote in >> > > news:d56l03$get$1@domitilla.aioe.org:>> > >
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in>> >>> news:020520050811261779%art_deco@127.0.0.1: >> >>>
A question about voting -- I've noticed at least two of what I>> >>>> assume are protest ballots in which the voter has voted No or>> NotA >>>> on every ballot item. Are these counted, or are they>> rejected for >>>> reasons such as the AMMJ block voting rule? Just>> curious; >>>> obviously it is possible for a block of kooks>> (alt.astronomy or >>>> alt.snuh, for example) armed with socks to>> outvote all Yes or >>>> candidate items by simply voting no on>> everything >>> >> >>> I will be doing the vote counting on the 8th. Be rest assured that>> >>> there will not be any problems. >> >>>
"Sean Monaghan" <sean@k00kology.info> wrote in news:xn0e1s8hg1lk4mz002 @kookology.info:
PJR wrote:>
On Tuesday 03 May 2005, Gary L Burnore wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:>>
On 3 May 2005 03:46:56 +0200, Major Imbu <Imbu@co1min.gov> wrote:>> >
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler <graff@colmin.gov> wrote in >> > > news:d56l03$get$1@domitilla.aioe.org:>> > >
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in>> >>> news:020520050811261779%art_deco@127.0.0.1: >> >>>
A question about voting -- I've noticed at least two of what I>> >>>> assume are protest ballots in which the voter has voted No or>> NotA >>>> on every ballot item. Are these counted, or are they>> rejected for >>>> reasons such as the AMMJ block voting rule? Just>> curious; >>>> obviously it is possible for a block of kooks>> (alt.astronomy or >>>> alt.snuh, for example) armed with socks to>> outvote all Yes or >>>> candidate items by simply voting no on>> everything >>> >> >>> I will be doing the vote counting on the 8th. Be rest assured
In article <d56neb$lir$11@upa.databasix.com>, posted Mon, 02 May 2005 21:28:14 -0500, Fred Hall fkhall@databasix.com says...
On 03 May 2005 02:21:57 GMT, "Sean Monaghan" <sean@k00kology.info>>wrote:>
PJR wrote:>>
On Tuesday 03 May 2005, Gary L Burnore wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:>>>
On 3 May 2005 03:46:56 +0200, Major Imbu <Imbu@co1min.gov> wrote:>>> >
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler <graff@colmin.gov> wrote in >>> > > news:d56l03$get$1@domitilla.aioe.org:>>> > >
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in>>> >>> news:020520050811261779%art_deco@127.0.0.1: >>> >>>
A question about voting -- I've noticed at least two of what I>>> >>>> assume are protest ballots in which the voter has voted No or>>> NotA >>>> on every ballot item. Are these counted, or are they>>> rejected for >>>> reasons such as the AMMJ block voting rule? Just>>> curious; >>>> obviously it is possible for a block of kooks>>> (alt.astronomy or >>>> alt.snuh, for example) armed with socks to>>> outvote all Yes or >>>> candidate items by simply voting no on>>> everything >>> >>> >>> I will be doing the vote counting on the 8th. Be rest assured that>>> >>> there will not be any problems. >>> >>>
I am glad to hear there will be a proper vote count performed.>>> > >
The least you could do is use a different newsreader or something,>>> > k00k. Or how about a different fake .gov domain? >>>
I don't think I've seen a holier sock since Rusty's last one.>>
I officially nominate Colonel Graff for Coward of the Month.>>
Seconds?>
Seconded.
Third
Kali -- "But I don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked. "Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat, "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad." -Lewis Carroll
Fred Hall <fkhall@databasix.com> wrote in news:d56neb$lir$11 @upa.databasix.com:
On 03 May 2005 02:21:57 GMT, "Sean Monaghan" <sean@k00kology.info>> wrote:>
PJR wrote:>>
On Tuesday 03 May 2005, Gary L Burnore wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:>>>
On 3 May 2005 03:46:56 +0200, Major Imbu <Imbu@co1min.gov> wrote:>>> >
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler <graff@colmin.gov> wrote in >>> > > news:d56l03$get$1@domitilla.aioe.org:>>> > >
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in>>> >>> news:020520050811261779%art_deco@127.0.0.1: >>> >>>
A question about voting -- I've noticed at least two of what I>>> >>>> assume are protest ballots in which the voter has voted No or>>> NotA >>>> on every ballot item. Are these counted, or are they>>> rejected for >>>> reasons such as the AMMJ block voting rule? Just>>> curious; >>>> obviously it is possible for a block of kooks>>> (alt.astronomy or >>>> alt.snuh, for example) armed with socks to>>> outvote all Yes or >>>> candidate items by simply voting no on>>> everything >>> >>> >>> I will be doing the vote counting on the 8th. Be rest assured
that>>> >>> there will not be any problems. >>> >>>
In article <d56neb$lir$11@upa.databasix.com>, posted Mon, 02 > May 2005 21:28:14 -0500, Fred Hall fkhall@databasix.com says...>
On 03 May 2005 02:21:57 GMT, "Sean Monaghan" <sean@k00kology.info>> >wrote:> >
PJR wrote:> >>
On Tuesday 03 May 2005, Gary L Burnore wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:> >>>
On 3 May 2005 03:46:56 +0200, Major Imbu <Imbu@co1min.gov> wrote:> >>> >
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler <graff@colmin.gov> wrote in > >>> > > news:d56l03$get$1@domitilla.aioe.org:> >>> > >
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in> >>> >>> news:020520050811261779%art_deco@127.0.0.1: > >>> >>>
A question about voting -- I've noticed at least two of what I> >>> >>>> assume are protest ballots in which the voter has voted No or> >>> NotA >>>> on every ballot item. Are these counted, or are they> >>> rejected for >>>> reasons such as the AMMJ block voting rule? Just> >>> curious; >>>> obviously it is possible for a block of kooks> >>> (alt.astronomy or >>>> alt.snuh, for example) armed with socks to> >>> outvote all Yes or >>>> candidate items by simply voting no on> >>> everything >>> > >>> >>> I will be doing the vote counting on the 8th. Be rest assured that> >>> >>> there will not be any problems. > >>> >>>
On 3 May 2005 04:39:23 +0200, Major Imbu <Imbu@co1min.gov> wrote:
Fred Hall <fkhall@databasix.com> wrote in news:d56neb$lir$11>@upa.databasix.com:>
On 03 May 2005 02:21:57 GMT, "Sean Monaghan" <sean@k00kology.info>>> wrote:>>
PJR wrote:>>>
On Tuesday 03 May 2005, Gary L Burnore wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:>>>>
On 3 May 2005 03:46:56 +0200, Major Imbu <Imbu@co1min.gov> wrote:>>>> >
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler <graff@colmin.gov> wrote in >>>> > > news:d56l03$get$1@domitilla.aioe.org:>>>> > >
Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in>>>> >>> news:020520050811261779%art_deco@127.0.0.1: >>>> >>>
A question about voting -- I've noticed at least two of what I>>>> >>>> assume are protest ballots in which the voter has voted No or>>>> NotA >>>> on every ballot item. Are these counted, or are they>>>> rejected for >>>> reasons such as the AMMJ block voting rule? Just>>>> curious; >>>> obviously it is possible for a block of kooks>>>> (alt.astronomy or >>>> alt.snuh, for example) armed with socks to>>>> outvote all Yes or >>>> candidate items by simply voting no on>>>> everything >>> >>>> >>> I will be doing the vote counting on the 8th. Be rest assured >that>>>> >>> there will not be any problems. >>>> >>>
I am glad to hear there will be a proper vote count performed.>>>> > >
The least you could do is use a different newsreader or something,>>>> > k00k. Or how about a different fake .gov domain? >>>>
I don't think I've seen a holier sock since Rusty's last one.>>>
I officially nominate Colonel Graff for Coward of the Month.>>>
Seconds?>>
Seconded.>>
Even if you DID want to claim you're a troll, trying to set followups to email shows you're nothing but a k00k.
Pathetic, the FNVW will over rule and deny.
The FNVW can't overrule and deny. Even the fake one said he wasn't going to determine the qualification, only that a nomination and a second occured.
You, sock, are overruled. -- gburnore@databasix dot com --------------------------------------------------------------------------- How you look depends on where you go. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³ | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³ DataBasix | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³ | ÝÛ³ 3 4 1 4 2 ݳ޳ 6 9 0 6 9 ÝÛ³ Black Helicopter Repair Svcs Division | Official Proof of Purchase =========================================================================== Want one? GET one! http://signup.databasix.com ===========================================================================
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please . Если Вы хотите пожаловаться на содержимое этой страницы, пожалуйста .
