What is an Ignore list?
No compete after release?
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• GYXU
  • Ñîîáùåñòâà
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Register!

GYXU > Pro Wrestling > No compete after release? 15 April 2005 05:24:58

  Recent blog posts: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Ìîäåðàòîð:

No compete after release?

Don Del Grande 14 April 2005 05:25:30
 I read that Rhyno and Matt Hardy are under some form of no-compete
clause for some number of days (30? 90?). How can they be held to a
stipulation in a contract from which they were supposedly released?
Or were they "released effective 90 days from now", so there's no
chance of them even looking like they're going to be on, say, TNA any
time soon?

-- Don
Add comment
Hack-Man 14 April 2005 07:29:07 permanent link ]
 Don Del Grande <del_grande_news@ea­rthlink.net> wrote:
| I read that Rhyno and Matt Hardy are under some form of no-compete
| clause for some number of days (30? 90?). How can they be held to a
| stipulation in a contract from which they were supposedly released?
| Or were they "released effective 90 days from now", so there's no
| chance of them even looking like they're going to be on, say, TNA any
| time soon?

Haven't you been paying attention for the last 10 years or so?

*Everyone* that gets released by WWE (and pretty much everyone that
got released from WCW) hasn't been able to look for work for 90
days. They still get paid for those 90 days, so most people don't
complain. "Getting paid not to work? Woo hoo!"

I think X-pac might have been an exception. I think he asked for
his release and WWE allowed him to go to WCW immediately (and
therefore Vince didn't have to keep paying him for the next 90
days).

SPAMguard: add a dash between "Hack" and "Man" to send me email
--
RSPW's most long-lasting poster
Voted "Most On-Topic Poster" in 2002 & 2003 & 2004 RSPW Poster Awards
rspw@HackMan.com Video/C/Unix geek http://Hack-Man.com­/Wrestling
Add comment
Rockboy 14 April 2005 07:41:39 permanent link ]
 Don Del Grande wrote:> I read that Rhyno and Matt Hardy are under some form of no-compete> clause for some number of days (30? 90?). How can they be held to a> stipulation in a contract from which they were supposedly released?> Or were they "released effective 90 days from now", so there's no> chance of them even looking like they're going to be on, say, TNA any> time soon?

Let's see if TNA will even be around in 90 days.

--
Rockboy
We've brought someone in to shut you up
It's a life's work
Add comment
Ralph Snart 14 April 2005 10:38:16 permanent link ]
 "Hack-Man" <rspw@HackMan.com> wrote in message
news:fmor51hhvdmjkv­m070dqh6vp5qr1e7par2­@4ax.com...> Don Del Grande <del_grande_news@ea­rthlink.net> wrote:> | I read that Rhyno and Matt Hardy are under some form of no-compete> | clause for some number of days (30? 90?). How can they be held to a> | stipulation in a contract from which they were supposedly released?> | Or were they "released effective 90 days from now", so there's no> | chance of them even looking like they're going to be on, say, TNA any> | time soon?>
Haven't you been paying attention for the last 10 years or so?>
*Everyone* that gets released by WWE (and pretty much everyone that> got released from WCW) hasn't been able to look for work for 90> days. They still get paid for those 90 days, so most people don't> complain. "Getting paid not to work? Woo hoo!">
I think X-pac might have been an exception. I think he asked for> his release and WWE allowed him to go to WCW immediately (and> therefore Vince didn't have to keep paying him for the next 90> days).>

Which proves, as Jim Cornette so accurately stated, just how worthless
X-Puke was.......


Add comment
Don Del Grande 15 April 2005 05:24:58 permanent link ]
 Hack-Man wrote:
Don Del Grande wrote:
| I read that Rhyno and Matt Hardy are under some form of no-compete>| clause for some number of days (30? 90?). How can they be held to a>| stipulation in a contract from which they were supposedly released?>| Or were they "released effective 90 days from now", so there's no>| chance of them even looking like they're going to be on, say, TNA any>| time soon?
Haven't you been paying attention for the last 10 years or so?

When it comes to wrestling, I'm lucky if I remember what happened ten
weeks ago. (PLEASE, let's NOT start a thread of everything that has
happened in wrestling up through three months ago, like "Owen Hart
died" or "Shawn screwed Bret" or "WCW is out of business"...)
*Everyone* that gets released by WWE (and pretty much everyone that> got released from WCW) hasn't been able to look for work for 90> days. They still get paid for those 90 days, so most people don't> complain. "Getting paid not to work? Woo hoo!"

In other words, the release is effective in 90 days (since they're
getting paid). Either that, or there's a separate post-release 90-day
contract; WWE pays, and the wrestler doesn't play.

-- Don
Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
respect your talk pals, avoid using obscene language, typing entire messages in CAPS, posting buy/sell ads or violating netiquette or the RF Criminal Code..


GYXU > Pro Wrestling > No compete after release? 15 April 2005 05:24:58

see also:
Re: has max ever heard of nellis small…
pass tests:
see also:
:-)
Sri Lanka Vs West Indies

  Copyright © 2001—2009 GYXU
Idea: Miñhael Monashev
See Help and FAQ in the community support.gyxu.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.gyxu.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.gyxu.com.
Information for parents.
Write us at:
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .