Re: I finally realize why liberals want Terri Schiavo dead (fixed)
Sean Scott 30 March 2005 23:04:07
"I'm a djinn, wanna rub my lamp" <imagenierubmylamp@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1112208284.159376.88710@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...>
Sean Scott wrote:>> <livingdjinn@yahoo.com> wrote in message>> news:1112207312.041954.161740@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...>> > Reading these posts and seeing liberals pathetically attempt to> justify>> > Schiavo being starved to death, I came across a few common> arguments:>> >
"who would want to live that way">> >
"it's compassionate to kill her because she's supposedly a> vegetable">> >
"let her die, with whatever dignity she has left">> >
"I certainly want to live that way so terri wouldn't either">> >
Liberals have always had a problem respecting the boundaries of> others.>> > In particular, they think they have the right to dictate every> single>> > detail of everyone's lives for them. That's where the whole "it> takes a>> > village to raise a child" thing comes from. Liberals think they> know>> > what's best for you, better than you do. And they want to make all> our>> > important decisions for us.>> >
That's why liberals want Terri Schiavo to die. They see Terri in> her>> > condition, decide that they wouldn't want to live that way> themselves,>> > and go about murdering her because they want to make the decision> for>> > her that she's unfit to live, no matter what she herself would> really>> > want. It's sick, but what would you expect from a group of people> so>> > closely tied to communism and who mock the word of God?>> >
Listen to me very carefully, liberals. You do not have the> authority to>> > decide what standard of living is acceptable for Terri. You do not> have>> > the authority to decide that Terri is better off dead than alive.> You>> > do have the authority to not decide that murdering Terri by> starving>> > her to death is more merciful than not murdering her and allowing> her>> > to live. Ok? I know this goes against everything Hillary Clinton,>> > Barbara Streisand, Dianne Feinstein and your college professors> have>> > told you, but you do not dictate other peoples lives and tell them> what>> > to do.>> >
Ahhh maybe they don't, but her Husband does have that authority and> the>> courts have agreed with him.>
Courts don't have the right to execute an innocent woman, especially> not when the method of execution is cruel and unusable punishment like> starving them to death.>
The husband as her legal guardian has that right the courts are not executing anyone they just ruled that the husband has the right to pull the feeding tube.
<livingdjinn@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1112207312.041954.161740@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...> Reading these posts and seeing liberals pathetically attempt to justify> Schiavo being starved to death, I came across a few common arguments:>
"who would want to live that way">
"it's compassionate to kill her because she's supposedly a vegetable">
"let her die, with whatever dignity she has left">
"I certainly want to live that way so terri wouldn't either">
Liberals have always had a problem respecting the boundaries of others.> In particular, they think they have the right to dictate every single> detail of everyone's lives for them. That's where the whole "it takes a> village to raise a child" thing comes from. Liberals think they know> what's best for you, better than you do. And they want to make all our> important decisions for us.>
That's why liberals want Terri Schiavo to die. They see Terri in her> condition, decide that they wouldn't want to live that way themselves,> and go about murdering her because they want to make the decision for> her that she's unfit to live, no matter what she herself would really> want. It's sick, but what would you expect from a group of people so> closely tied to communism and who mock the word of God?>
Listen to me very carefully, liberals. You do not have the authority to> decide what standard of living is acceptable for Terri. You do not have> the authority to decide that Terri is better off dead than alive. You> do have the authority to not decide that murdering Terri by starving> her to death is more merciful than not murdering her and allowing her> to live. Ok? I know this goes against everything Hillary Clinton,> Barbara Streisand, Dianne Feinstein and your college professors have> told you, but you do not dictate other peoples lives and tell them what> to do.>
Ahhh maybe they don't, but her Husband does have that authority and the courts have agreed with him.
"I'm a djinn, wanna rub my lamp" <imagenierubmylamp@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1112209215.952757.207610@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...>
Thoth wrote:>> "I'm a djinn, wanna rub my lamp" <imagenierubmylamp@hotmail.com>> wrote in>> message news:1112208284.159376.88710@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...>> >
Sean Scott wrote:>> >> >
Ahhh maybe they don't, but her Husband does have that authority> and>> > the>> >> courts have agreed with him.>> >
Courts don't have the right to execute an innocent woman,> especially>> > not when the method of execution is cruel and unusable punishment> like>> > starving them to death.>>
You are right, for once. Thankfully, that's not what's happening.>
Yes it is. The courts have overstepped their boundaries and taken> unconstitutional power for themselves and mandated that an innocent> woman should be executed. Or they have given Michael Schiavo a licence> to kill, take your pic.
The Florida legislature gave MS a license to kill when it passed legislation that enabled a proxy to make medical decisions for incapacitated parties on what amounts to hearsay evidence. The trial court followed the law in Florida, according to the higher state and federal courts. The real shame is that folks like you do nothing productive to change things.
Ahhh maybe they don't, but her Husband does have that authority>
courts have agreed with him.>>>
Courts don't have the right to execute an innocent woman,>
especially>
not when the method of execution is cruel and unusable punishment>
like>
starving them to death.>>
You are right, for once. Thankfully, that's not what's happening.>
Yes it is. The courts have overstepped their boundaries and taken> unconstitutional power for themselves and mandated that an innocent> woman should be executed. Or they have given Michael Schiavo a licence> to kill, take your pic.>
"YYZedd" <yyzedd@NOSPAMmindspring.com> wrote in message news:UFD2e.7792$H06.6095@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...> Not intended as a rebuttal dipshit. Intended as "go post your crap where > it> belongs cause it doesn't belong in an xbox ng!"
I never knew alt.lowlife.fucking.losers.circle-jerking existed I'll look for it to see if Lord Guppie is posting there as well.
Reading these posts and seeing liberals pathetically attempt to justify> Schiavo being starved to death, I came across a few common arguments:>
"who would want to live that way">
"it's compassionate to kill her because she's supposedly a vegetable">
"let her die, with whatever dignity she has left">
"I certainly want to live that way so terri wouldn't either">
Liberals have always had a problem respecting the boundaries of others.> In particular, they think they have the right to dictate every single> detail of everyone's lives for them. That's where the whole "it takes a> village to raise a child" thing comes from. Liberals think they know> what's best for you, better than you do. And they want to make all our> important decisions for us.>
That's why liberals want Terri Schiavo to die. They see Terri in her> condition, decide that they wouldn't want to live that way themselves,> and go about murdering her because they want to make the decision for> her that she's unfit to live, no matter what she herself would really> want. It's sick, but what would you expect from a group of people so> closely tied to communism and who mock the word of God?>
Listen to me very carefully, liberals. You do not have the authority to> decide what standard of living is acceptable for Terri. You do not have> the authority to decide that Terri is better off dead than alive. You> do have the authority to not decide that murdering Terri by starving> her to death is more merciful than not murdering her and allowing her> to live. Ok? I know this goes against everything Hillary Clinton,> Barbara Streisand, Dianne Feinstein and your college professors have> told you, but you do not dictate other peoples lives and tell them what> to do.>
