What is Atom?
windsurfing death in australia?
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• GYXU
  • Ñîîáùåñòâà
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Register!

GYXU > Kites, widsurfing, waterski > windsurfing death in australia? 16 April 2005 18:25:17

  Recent blog posts: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Ìîäåðàòîð:

windsurfing death in australia?

The Dennises 28 March 2005 15:38:34
 Just caught the end of a news item on the radio but missed the guts of it.
Didn't hear anything more about it on the TV news. Does anyone know the
story?


Add comment
Brian 30 March 2005 17:07:18 permanent link ]
 
Let me tell you that others die just sleeping! Imagine that!!>
And some people don't die when jumping of a high building.>
So this all proves that sleeping is dangerous and jumping from a sky> scraper isn't.>
Thanks for sharing your insight.


I'm pretty sure that I slept thru the night without dying. If not though, I
must be in hell.. because I'm typing in rec dot instead of going sailing.

Brian


Add comment
Brett & Yvette Denning 31 March 2005 04:38:50 permanent link ]
 the only thing I heard, was a young boy was paddling a sailboard (board
only) on lake hume, victoria, when he got into difficulty and drowned. Worse
part is was only metres from shore and his familiy was with him..



Add comment
News.Gosiouxlookout.Com 31 March 2005 06:13:29 permanent link ]
 Found this link:

http://www.theaustr­alian.news.com.au/co­mmon/story_page/0,57­44,12672197%255E1702­,00.html

Thoughts and prayers to the family.


Add comment
Paul Braunbehrens 31 March 2005 09:53:29 permanent link ]
 I agree with most of what you say, in fact I was about to make a
similar post, but I think you omitted on major point. People engaged
in a physical activity such as SCUBA, windsurfing etc. do sometimes die
of, let's say, a heart attack. People who are sleeping a lot, watching
TV a lot, and eating a lot of junk food, and don't windsurf, have a
higher risk of death due to their body being in bad shape.

I guess the point I'm trying to make is that risk is a little bit more
complex than you make it out to be. Overall, I'd be willing to bet
that windsurfers have a higher life expectancy than obese couch
potatoes. So in some ways, Windsurfing is less risky than not
windsurfing.

There are some sports that have a much higher risk, and there is a
chart floating around out there somewhere. I can't find the URL (and
this is about 10 years old) but here it is for what it's worth.

The discussion that follows typically centers around the fact that you
are more likely to die while sleeping than in a fire. That is not what
it says. It says that just living carries a risk, some of us would say
a certainty, of death.

I think Windsurfing is probably somewhere between swimming and SCUBA
diving... or if you like, very close to "Living".

I have been told that this chart was used in legal proceedings and the
company that compiled it carried a lot of clout. Here's the chart:


COMPARATIVE RISK OF DIFFERENT ACTIVITIES

Estimates of Fatal Risk

fatalities
Activity per million hrs
-------- ---------------
Skydiving 128.71
General Aviation 15.58
On-road Motorcycling 8.80
Scuba Diving 1.98
Living (all causes of death) 1.53
Swimming 1.07
Snowmobiling .88
Passenger cars .47
Water skiing .28
Bicycling .26
Flying (scheduled domestic airlines) .15
Hunting .08
Cosmic Radiation from transcontinental flights .035
Home Living (active) .027
Traveling in a School Bus .022
Passenger Car Post-collision fire .017
Home Living, active & passive (sleeping) .014
Residential Fire .003




Compiled by Failure Analysis Associates, Inc. (Design News, 10-4-93)


In article <1112214173.819930.­264580@f14g2000cwb.g­ooglegroups.com>,
<ihatespam@kudos.00­server.com> wrote:
Berend de Boer wrote:> > Let me tell you that others die just sleeping! Imagine that!!> >
And some people don't die when jumping of a high building.> >
So this all proves that sleeping is dangerous and jumping from a sky> > scraper isn't.>
I think it's important not to trivialize the risk analysis of doing an> activity. Using arguments like that can give people a false sense of> security and cause them to not understand the risks.>
All activity has some risk associated with it. The risks associated> with some activities are greater than others. If someone wants to go> kitesurfing (or windsurfing, or skydiving, or rockclimbing, or> whatever), that's fine, but they should be able to objectively evalute> the risks of the activity.>
I know you were being facetious, but your argument about sleeping and> jumping from a building was incorrect in a couple of areas. First,> people who die sleeping don't die from the act of sleeping. They from> something else while they are sleeping. People who die from jumping> from buildings do so specifically because of that activity. Second,> you would need to compare the total amount of time sleeping versus the> total amount of time jumping from buildings to get an accurate> comparison of the risks. I can sleep for 8 hours and have a very low> chance of dying, but if I jumped from buildings for 8 hours I would> have a very high chance of dying.>
You hear these types of argument all the time in the rockclimbing> community when a climber dies. Someone will usually make a statement> like: since you can also die while riding a bicycle, rockclimbing is> not any more dangerous than riding a bicycle. There's also a lot of> trivialization of the cause of how they died. They will blame it on> inexperience or on improper use of the equipment with the underlying> theme that it won't happen to them because they are experienced and> they use the equipment properly. I'm sure that's a self-defense> mechanism--who wants to think they are voluntarily putting themselves> in a position to die.>
A good rule of thumb when considering the risk of an activity is this:> How likely is something to go wrong, and when it does, what is the> chance that it will lead to severe injury or death?>
Consider BASE jumping. Relatively speaking, the chance of something> going wrong is pretty low. Most jumps go off without a hitch. But> when something does go wrong, there is an extremely high chance of> severe injury or death. You literally have a fraction of a second to> fix things before you end up dead. So going into that sport, you> should know that most of the time things will go okay, but when they> don't, you could easily end up dead.>
Compare that to windsurfing. The chance of something going wrong is> pretty high. We fall off the board all the time for a variety of> reasons. But the chance of getting severely injured is low. Even when> you do fall off, it's not like you really have to do anything special> to prevent injury.>
But with kitesurfing, when something goes wrong, you have to be able to> depower the kite or there's a good chance you'll be severely injured.> That fact should not be trivialized. Kitesurfing might give you more> reward, but you take more risk to get it.>
Add comment
Bsinclair 3 April 2005 10:13:11 permanent link ]
 Must be something lost in translation. Spending a million hours in a
burning house carries a .003 risk of death?
Does not matter.
I gotta agree that windsurfing probably increases your lifespan rather than
shortens it. I'm not so sure about kiting though.
bs
......> company that compiled> COMPARATIVE RISK OF DIFFERENT ACTIVITIES>
Estimates of Fatal Risk>
fatalities> Activity per million hrs> -------- ---------------> Skydiving 128.71> General Aviation 15.58> On-road Motorcycling 8.80> Scuba Diving 1.98> Living (all causes of death) 1.53> Swimming 1.07> Snowmobiling .88> Passenger cars .47> Water skiing .28> Bicycling .26> Flying (scheduled domestic airlines) .15> Hunting .08> Cosmic Radiation from transcontinental flights .035> Home Living (active) .027> Traveling in a School Bus .022> Passenger Car Post-collision fire .017> Home Living, active & passive (sleeping) .014> Residential Fire .003>
Compiled by Failure Analysis Associates, Inc. (Design News, 10-4-93)>
In article <1112214173.819930.­264580@f14g2000cwb.g­ooglegroups.com>,> <ihatespam@kudos.00­server.com> wrote:>
Berend de Boer wrote:> > > Let me tell you that others die just sleeping! Imagine that!!> > >
And some people don't die when jumping of a high building.> > >
So this all proves that sleeping is dangerous and jumping from a sky> > > scraper isn't.> >
I think it's important not to trivialize the risk analysis of doing an> > activity. Using arguments like that can give people a false sense of> > security and cause them to not understand the risks.> >
All activity has some risk associated with it. The risks associated> > with some activities are greater than others. If someone wants to go> > kitesurfing (or windsurfing, or skydiving, or rockclimbing, or> > whatever), that's fine, but they should be able to objectively evalute> > the risks of the activity.> >
I know you were being facetious, but your argument about sleeping and> > jumping from a building was incorrect in a couple of areas. First,> > people who die sleeping don't die from the act of sleeping. They from> > something else while they are sleeping. People who die from jumping> > from buildings do so specifically because of that activity. Second,> > you would need to compare the total amount of time sleeping versus the> > total amount of time jumping from buildings to get an accurate> > comparison of the risks. I can sleep for 8 hours and have a very low> > chance of dying, but if I jumped from buildings for 8 hours I would> > have a very high chance of dying.> >
You hear these types of argument all the time in the rockclimbing> > community when a climber dies. Someone will usually make a statement> > like: since you can also die while riding a bicycle, rockclimbing is> > not any more dangerous than riding a bicycle. There's also a lot of> > trivialization of the cause of how they died. They will blame it on> > inexperience or on improper use of the equipment with the underlying> > theme that it won't happen to them because they are experienced and> > they use the equipment properly. I'm sure that's a self-defense> > mechanism--who wants to think they are voluntarily putting themselves> > in a position to die.> >
A good rule of thumb when considering the risk of an activity is this:> > How likely is something to go wrong, and when it does, what is the> > chance that it will lead to severe injury or death?> >
Consider BASE jumping. Relatively speaking, the chance of something> > going wrong is pretty low. Most jumps go off without a hitch. But> > when something does go wrong, there is an extremely high chance of> > severe injury or death. You literally have a fraction of a second to> > fix things before you end up dead. So going into that sport, you> > should know that most of the time things will go okay, but when they> > don't, you could easily end up dead.> >
Compare that to windsurfing. The chance of something going wrong is> > pretty high. We fall off the board all the time for a variety of> > reasons. But the chance of getting severely injured is low. Even when> > you do fall off, it's not like you really have to do anything special> > to prevent injury.> >
But with kitesurfing, when something goes wrong, you have to be able to> > depower the kite or there's a good chance you'll be severely injured.> > That fact should not be trivialized. Kitesurfing might give you more> > reward, but you take more risk to get it.> >


Add comment
Tom - Chicago 5 April 2005 19:58:37 permanent link ]
 Kitesurfing - like high altitude mountaineering - seems to have a high
degree of fatal obective risk - that is risk you cannot control - and
therefore too many highly skilled people die.

Windsurfing has a relatively low level of objective risk - and I would guess
that most people who die windsurfing make a serious error in sailing
location, time, equipment, lack of breakdown prep/self-rescue strategy.

Tom - Chicago


"Kevin K" <kevin_nzl88@hotmai­l.com> wrote in message
news:607636b9.05040­21110.22833269@posti­ng.google.com...>I would put windsurfing in at around 0.30. It would interesting to> know what the reak risk is?>
Kevin>
I think Windsurfing is probably somewhere between swimming and SCUBA>> diving... or if you like, very close to "Living".>>
I have been told that this chart was used in legal proceedings and the>> company that compiled it carried a lot of clout. Here's the chart:>>
COMPARATIVE RISK OF DIFFERENT ACTIVITIES>>
Estimates of Fatal Risk>>
fatalities>> Activity per million hrs>> -------- --------------->> Skydiving 128.71>> General Aviation 15.58>> On-road Motorcycling 8.80>> Scuba Diving 1.98>> Living (all causes of death) 1.53>> Swimming 1.07>> Snowmobiling .88>> Passenger cars .47>> Water skiing .28>> Bicycling .26>> Flying (scheduled domestic airlines) .15>> Hunting .08>> Cosmic Radiation from transcontinental flights .035>> Home Living (active) .027>> Traveling in a School Bus .022>> Passenger Car Post-collision fire .017>> Home Living, active & passive (sleeping) .014>> Residential Fire .003>>


Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
respect your talk pals, avoid using obscene language, typing entire messages in CAPS, posting buy/sell ads or violating netiquette or the RF Criminal Code..


GYXU > Kites, widsurfing, waterski > windsurfing death in australia? 16 April 2005 18:25:17

see also:
Shelton can do things no one else can…
So, HHH has booking power *ON* screen…
pass tests:
see also:
Blog Feed

  Copyright © 2001—2009 GYXU
Idea: Miñhael Monashev
See Help and FAQ in the community support.gyxu.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.gyxu.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.gyxu.com.
Information for parents.
Write us at:
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .