TIGER WOODS: Don't know. I just know I've got a long way to go. A lot of things I need to work on to get better. ************
As we all know, Tiger was "very close" all through 2003 and 2004, so this is a huge step backwards for him. As I write this, he is again playing miserably, leading the Wachovia after going three under through the first four holes in the second round. Let's hope he can pull out of this slump and start playing decently again.
TIGER WOODS: Don't know. I just know I've got a long way to go. A lot> of things I need to work on to get better.> ************>
As we all know, Tiger was "very close" all through 2003 and 2004, so> this is a huge step backwards for him. As I write this, he is again> playing miserably, leading the Wachovia after going three under> through the first four holes in the second round. Let's hope he can> pull out of this slump and start playing decently again.
That's nice. You throw in a little story about Tiger whining about his game, and then you throw in the "spoiler". Thanks for your insight and complete disregard for the rest of us following the Wachovia.
Who cares ..... So what ...... Tiger this, Tiger that ........
Get a fucking life.
================================================= "multi" <multi@asm.org> wrote in message news:aopm71t3na3knm1ufi4dc4j1tfj3dt1ub1@4ax.com...> From Tiger's press conference at the Wachovia:> http://www.tigerwoods.com/news/fullstory.sps?iNewsid=172831&itype=&iCategoryID=505> *********> Q. When you started with this philosophy with swing, where would you> say you are in the process?>
TIGER WOODS: A long way to go.>
Q. Halfway there?>
TIGER WOODS: Don't know. I just know I've got a long way to go. A lot> of things I need to work on to get better.> ************>
As we all know, Tiger was "very close" all through 2003 and 2004, so> this is a huge step backwards for him. As I write this, he is again> playing miserably, leading the Wachovia after going three under> through the first four holes in the second round. Let's hope he can> pull out of this slump and start playing decently again.>
On Fri, 06 May 2005 13:11:04 GMT, "Toomanyputters" <rainydays@theswamp.com> wrote:>Thanks for your insight and >complete disregard for the rest of us following the Wachovia.
I hope you are joking. Tiger will be through with his round four hours before TV coverage starts. They may or may not show a couple of his putts before the live coverage. It's early in the second f**king round. What in the hell am I spoiling?
On Fri, 6 May 2005 10:55:24 -0400, "TomCAt" <tomcatm@copper.net> wrote:>The constant Tiger posting is so lame. I swear most of the readers of this >newsgroup could not name ten other PGA pros.
You are so right. It's just as bad in the politics groups; half the posts are about Bush. Go figure.
"Howard Brazee" <howard@brazee.net> wrote in message news:d5g18t$888$1@peabody.colorado.edu...>
On 6-May-2005, "TomCAt" <tomcatm@copper.net> wrote:>
You can not argue with TysmO, he is too dumb for arguing. But, it is
fun to> > read some of his more outrageous stupidity.> >
What I find laughable is that the more he posts the more I see postings> > basically saying that Black people are stupid.>
...>
The constant Tiger posting is so lame. I swear most of the readers of
this> > newsgroup could not name ten other PGA pros.>
That seems nearly as outrageous.
you have to factor in the cloud cuckoo land that some of the "regulars" here seem to live in. Remember, only they know anything about the game, and people who drop in, especially during big tournaments are lowlife scum who ought to be sneered at.
On 6 May 2005 08:42:13 -0700, "Annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com> wrote:
Good suggestion from someone who has spent a lot of bandwidth arguing>>with a black racist about something other than golf.>
There is no such thing as a black racist. Only whites are racist.>Don't you listen to his show?
You have to be kidding. I've heard all of that crap, and the white racist responses, for 40 years. Why waste my time? ___ \o ' | / \ Someone likes every shot* bk
Let's hope he can pull out of this slump and start playing decently again.>
Let's hope one day you develop a brain. Tiger "leading" after 21 holes is as relevant as the leader of a basketball game at the start of the 2nd quarter.
"Bobby Knight" <bknight@conramp.net> wrote in message news:mnvm71dquijlhjvokve27c513c9a58820b@4ax.com...> On Fri, 6 May 2005 09:11:25 -0400, "TomCAt" <tomcatm@copper.net>> wrote:>
Who cares ..... So what ...... Tiger this, Tiger that ........> >
Get a fucking life.>
Good suggestion from someone who has spent a lot of bandwidth arguing> with a black racist about something other than golf.>
This IS a golf news group.
Actually BK ol brother Ty was on topic. His assumption was all golfers are racist. Now where did I put my "golf-klan" robe?
On Fri, 6 May 2005 11:52:13 -0500, "MnMikew" <mnmiikkew@aol.com> wrote:
"Bobby Knight" <bknight@conramp.net> wrote in message>news:mnvm71dquijlhjvokve27c513c9a58820b@4ax.com...>> On Fri, 6 May 2005 09:11:25 -0400, "TomCAt" <tomcatm@copper.net>>> wrote:>>
Who cares ..... So what ...... Tiger this, Tiger that ........>> >
Get a fucking life.>>
Good suggestion from someone who has spent a lot of bandwidth arguing>> with a black racist about something other than golf.>>
This IS a golf news group.>
Actually BK ol brother Ty was on topic. His assumption was all golfers are>racist. Now where did I put my "golf-klan" robe?>
That part of the thread was discarded days ago. It has now become the same old, same old arguments since 1954.
In my evolving opinion 6 May 2005 22:41:14 [ permanent link ]
"multi" <multi@asm.org> wrote in message news:hk2n715dqu4k0ei3k2jm58v270lq2bpash@4ax.com... : On Fri, 06 May 2005 13:11:04 GMT, "Toomanyputters" : <rainydays@theswamp.com> wrote: : >Thanks for your insight and : >complete disregard for the rest of us following the Wachovia. : : I hope you are joking. Tiger will be through with his round four : hours before TV coverage starts. They may or may not show a couple of : his putts before the live coverage. It's early in the second f**king : round. What in the hell am I spoiling?