"-- he's got to be more careful what he does with his semen," said Chicago divorce lawyer Donald C. Schiller.
and
She asserts that when plaintiff 'delivered' his sperm, it was a gift -- an absolute and irrevocable transfer of title to property from a donor to a donee," Hartman wrote. "There was no agreement the original deposit would be returned upon request."
"-- he's got to be more careful what he does with his semen," said >Chicago divorce lawyer Donald C. Schiller.>
She asserts that when plaintiff 'delivered' his sperm, it was a gift -- >an absolute and irrevocable transfer of title to property from a donor >to a donee," Hartman wrote. "There was no agreement the original deposit >would be returned upon request."