Ironically enough, I feel it is one's duty to subvert racial> discrimination, so lying on such forms is in fact a form of> non-violent protest.
Oh i agree. Anything to subvert AA and other forms of "diversity" criteria is welcome, in my book.
-- I do not think the United States would come to an end if we lost our power to declare an Act of Congress void. I do think the Union would be imperiled if we could not make that declaration as to the laws of the several States.
Well seeing as the original posting was made in good faith by information> available at that time
Yes - i recall clicking on it shortly after you made the original post, and there was no retraction or correction at that time.
The "fault" lies with the newspaper that made the original mistake and posted it, not you.
PS - the fact that a correction came so quickly probably tells us something about how much WC knows his claims of being part-indian are to him having a job at CU...
-- I do not think the United States would come to an end if we lost our power to declare an Act of Congress void. I do think the Union would be imperiled if we could not make that declaration as to the laws of the several States.
xyzzy <invalid@addr.net> wrote in news:421e0d15_1@news1.prserv.net:>
Randolph M. Jones wrote:>>
James Schrumpf wrote:>>>
You nauseate me, Mr. OrangeDood <no_this_isnt@my_email.com>, with a >>>>nauseaus super-naus:>>>>
If you want me to go on arguing, you'll have to pay for another>>>>>five minutes, Matthew Hennig <matth@aggies.No_JuNk.com>!>>>>>
"Is he an Indian? Do we really care?" he said, quoting>>>>>> those he called his "white Republican" critics.>>>>>> "Let's cut to the chase; I am not," he said.>>>>>>
His pedigree is "not important," Churchill said: "The>>>>>> issue is the substance of what is said."">>>>>>
Let's review: He admits the truth, therefore he is a liar.>>>>>
OK, got it. Thanks.>>>>>
If you read his articles, and indeed his resume, he claims to be an >>>>American Indian. He was hired at CU on that basis, as part of a >>>>diversity program.>>>>
I don't think you can spin this as "he's not a liar.">>>>
...unless you want to click on the link up there and read the>>>correction to the story.>>>
oooopss. Here's betting that no 'wingers respond to your post.>
Well seeing as the original posting was made in good faith by information > available at that time, the original posting turned out to contain > erroneous information. If you'd bother reading the other posts before > you made this one, you'd see there was already a response.>
HTH
fully read a thread before posting? Are you joking?
xyzzy <invalid@addr.net> wrote in news:421e37b4_2@news1.prserv.net:>
Matthew Hennig wrote:>>
xyzzy <invalid@addr.net> wrote in news:421e0d15_1@news1.prserv.net:>>>
Randolph M. Jones wrote:>>>>
James Schrumpf wrote:>>>>>
You nauseate me, Mr. OrangeDood <no_this_isnt@my_email.com>, with a>>>>>>nauseaus super-naus:>>>>>>
If you want me to go on arguing, you'll have to pay for another>>>>>>>five minutes, Matthew Hennig <matth@aggies.No_JuNk.com>!>>>>>>>
"Is he an Indian? Do we really care?" he said, quoting>>>>>>>> those he called his "white Republican" critics.>>>>>>>> "Let's cut to the chase; I am not," he said.>>>>>>>>
His pedigree is "not important," Churchill said: "The>>>>>>>> issue is the substance of what is said."">>>>>>>>
Let's review: He admits the truth, therefore he is a liar.>>>>>>>
OK, got it. Thanks.>>>>>>>
If you read his articles, and indeed his resume, he claims to be an>>>>>>American Indian. He was hired at CU on that basis, as part of a >>>>>>diversity program.>>>>>>
I don't think you can spin this as "he's not a liar.">>>>>>
...unless you want to click on the link up there and read the>>>>>correction to the story.>>>>>
oooopss. Here's betting that no 'wingers respond to your post.>>>
Well seeing as the original posting was made in good faith by>>>information available at that time, the original posting turned out>>>to contain erroneous information. If you'd bother reading the other>>>posts before you made this one, you'd see there was already a>>>response. >>>
fully read a thread before posting? Are you joking?>
I know, I know, its asking alot, but at the time there were only about 5 > or 6 posts.>
Because if I give an inch you'll want a mile. Next thing you know, you'll be asking me to back up assertions with cites just because they are easy to find. You, sir, are sucking all the joy and fun out of rsfc.
