everything i've read makes it sound terrible (like the third matrix movie). why can't these directors and producers do better with all the dough that the movie companies shove in their pockets?
PP PP PP PP PP tt tt PP PP PP tt tt PP PP tttttt ttttttt PP PP ii ttt ttt PP ii ii it tt tt tt tt PP iii iii ttt tt
Joel K. 'Jay' Furr 26 February 2005 02:35:55 [ permanent link ]
jaybyrd <jbird@pitt_spamcheck_.edu> wrote in news:cvo8r5$aho$10 @usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu:
everything i've read makes it sound terrible (like the third matrix > movie). why can't these directors and producers do better with all the > dough that the movie companies shove in their pockets?
You can always go watch "Repo Man" again. 21 years later, it's stood the test of time.
"Joel K. 'Jay' Furr" <jfurr-nospam@nospam-furrs.org> wrote in message news:Xns9608B305B7E01jfurrfurrsorg@216.168.3.44...> jaybyrd <jbird@pitt_spamcheck_.edu> wrote in news:cvo8r5$aho$10> @usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu:>
everything i've read makes it sound terrible (like the third matrix> > movie). why can't these directors and producers do better with all the> > dough that the movie companies shove in their pockets?>
You can always go watch "Repo Man" again. 21 years later, it's stood the> test of time.
I caught Airport from 1970 today. Not a bad movie.
jaybyrd <jbird@pitt_spamcheck_.edu> wrote in news:cvo8r5$aho$10 @usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu:
dunric@yahoo.com wrote:>
...seriously jacking.>>
everything i've read makes it sound terrible (like the third matrix > movie). why can't these directors and producers do better with all the > dough that the movie companies shove in their pockets?
It's quite decent for a comic book movie.
Most people just don't realize going in that it's a comic book movie.
