J. Hugh Sullivan 7 December 2007 16:54:07 [ permanent link ]
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:45:15 -0800, Chuck Charlton <charlton@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <4757ff86.6080753@newsgroups.bellsouth.net>, J. Hugh
Sullivan <Eagle@bellsouth.net> wrote:
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 19:21:27 -0800, Chuck Charlton
<charlton@gmail.com> wrote:
Okay, I tweaked my spreadsheet to force 64 teams into 32 games, all
even numbers now:
SEC $50m 9/12 teams
B10 $47m 8/11
B12 $46m 8/12
ACC $28m 8/12
P10 $23m 5/10
BE $20m 5/8
WAC $19m 4/9
CUSa $5m 7/12
MW $3m 5/9
MidA $1m 2/12
Ind $.7m 1/4
SB $.3m 1/8
Did you? Am I miscounting? I still get 63.
I'm not dissing you - it's just a interesting stat.
Hugh
Sigh. Six Pac-10 teams are in. The Pac-10 payout is correct.
It would have been easier just to post the spreadsheet than to try to
re-key everything.
Again I hasten to add that what you did was very interesting and I appreciate it.
A small part of my job until I retired was looking for variants in statements, especially by lawyers in contracts. And it's easier to spot variants by others than in oneself.
Chuck Charlton 8 December 2007 05:15:02 [ permanent link ]
In article <47594f43.5070180@newsgroups.bellsouth.net>, J. Hugh Sullivan <Eagle@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Again I hasten to add that what you did was very interesting and I
appreciate it.
A small part of my job until I retired was looking for variants in
statements, especially by lawyers in contracts. And it's easier to
spot variants by others than in oneself.
Don't take anything I said as criticism.
Hugh
Oh, no offense taken. And by the way, I got all my info from the intertubes, so it has to be true.
I think the total payout is $248,750,000. Also, several bowls had formulas that might have resulted in different payouts to the two teams involved, but in the end only Chick-fil-A wound up paying differing amounts. Clemson is getting $3,250,000, while Auburn is getting $2,400,000.
Thomas R. Kettler 8 December 2007 06:43:44 [ permanent link ]
In article <071220071815021503%charlton@gmail.com>, Chuck Charlton <charlton@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <47594f43.5070180@newsgroups.bellsouth.net>, J. Hugh
Sullivan <Eagle@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Again I hasten to add that what you did was very interesting and I
appreciate it.
A small part of my job until I retired was looking for variants in
statements, especially by lawyers in contracts. And it's easier to
spot variants by others than in oneself.
Don't take anything I said as criticism.
Hugh
Oh, no offense taken. And by the way, I got all my info from the
intertubes, so it has to be true.
I think the total payout is $248,750,000. Also, several bowls had
formulas that might have resulted in different payouts to the two teams
involved, but in the end only Chick-fil-A wound up paying differing
amounts. Clemson is getting $3,250,000, while Auburn is getting
$2,400,000.
Unless I'm wrong again.
Well, you've never changed your payouts to indicate that a conference only receives $4.5 million for its 2nd team in the BCS, not the full $17 million. Also, non-BCS conferences receive money as part of the agreement they made with the BCS conferences. Please read the following from last year: <http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/2006-12-06-bowl-payouts_ x.htm> -- Remove blown from email address to reply.
You're right. I now see that I took the numbers from a table on a web site, and did not notice the non-footnoted note on that site explaining this year's BCS allocations. It seems that Georgia and Illinois will only get $6m each instead of $17m. Also, one of the Big 12 schools gets $17m while the other one gets $6m, although it does not appear to matter which gets which. And Hawaii gets $9m for the Sugar Bowl.
I'll update the spreadsheet on Sunday, while watching one of those inconquential Sunday football games.
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please . Если Вы хотите пожаловаться на содержимое этой страницы, пожалуйста .
