On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 16:47:49 GMT, Eagle@roadrunner.com (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote:>>On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 06:50:09 -0000, Onyx_Hokie <onyx_hokie@yahoo.cem>>>>[J. Hugh Sullivan (Eagle@roadrunner.com)]
Actually, what it's good for is for true bigots
.that's everybody...
No, Hugh, it isn't... that's just your knee-jerk response to being >>accurately labeled a bigot.
You have made some ignorant statements on rsfc but that ranks with any>of them although I don't disagree with the label. >I am surprised that you can't comprehend the definition of bigot "one>intolerantly devoted to his or her own prejudices or opinions". On>average you make about as many very strong statement of opinion as>anyone on rsfc - and you are taken down about as often as anybody for>them. The fact that no one can change your mind about anything is very>convincing evidence of your bigotry. I can paint myself with the same>brush but, apparently, I'm much more honest than you.
Apparently you're not, since Bryan HAS changed his opinion, in several instances I can think of, in this newsgroup.
Some people do try to make the term a real downer and slur but that is>simply because they are not sufficiently erudite to comprehend the>definition of the term. Those who comprehend treat it as any other>patently obvious fact.
You clearly do not comprehend the definition of "bigot". You keep repeating it, but you fail to understand.
You even discarded the sig "Slick" in favor of "Onyx Hokie". That in>itself says that you are devoted to the school - intolerantly devoted>might be an overstatement to a few people here but probably not all.
This is just moronic.
If you didn't attend VAT your support has no basis other than>prejudice for the school as opposed to all other schools. If you>attended loyalty provides a basis.>The point is clear enough that I probably will not need to educate you>further on the matter.
The point being that Hugh Sullivan does not comprehend what bigotry is. And you're right...you've certainly shown us a fine example.
..."I am certain that most Americans find your whining unbecoming of an NCO. Thank you for quitting. This country doesn't need your kind of leadership. Your kind weaken national security." Charles Beauchamp, 25 Nov 06
..."Whatever the standards are today they need to be high enough to prevent people like you from entering - we've lost enough wars recently." Hugh Sullivan, 26 Jan 07
Trent Woodruff 2 February 2007 04:11:34 [ permanent link ]
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 14:34:47 GMT, Eagle@roadrunner.com (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote:>>On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:16:29 -0600, Trent Woodruff>>>On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 02:16:15 GMT, Eagle@roadrunner.com (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote:>>>>On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:49:50 -0600, Trent Woodruff>>>>>On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:11:54 GMT, Eagle@roadrunner.com (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote:>>>>>>On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:02:35 -0000, Onyx_Hokie <onyx_hokie@yahoo.cem>
Actually, what it's good for is for true bigots
.that's everybody...
You keep saying this, but that doesn't make it true. Everyone is NOT>>>>a bigot. Everyone is BIASED. There is a tremendous difference>>>>between the two terms.
3bias vb bi ased or bi assed; bi as ing or bi as sing : prejudice >>>(c)2000 Zane Publishing, Inc. and Merriam-Webster, Incorporated. All>>>rights reserved>>>big ot \"bi-get\ n : one intolerantly devoted to his or her own>>>prejudices or opinions syn fanatic, enthusiast, zealot big ot ed>>>\-ge-ted\ adj big ot ry \-tre\ n >>>(c)2000 Zane Publishing, Inc. and Merriam-Webster, Incorporated. All>>>rights reserved>>>You are bigoted about bias.
That doesn't even make sense. Try again, bigot.
It takes a little more education than you have to comprehend - a GED>maybe.
Then you should run out and get that GED, because you clearly don't comprehend it.
..."I am certain that most Americans find your whining unbecoming of an NCO. Thank you for quitting. This country doesn't need your kind of leadership. Your kind weaken national security." Charles Beauchamp, 25 Nov 06
..."Whatever the standards are today they need to be high enough to prevent people like you from entering - we've lost enough wars recently." Hugh Sullivan, 26 Jan 07
Rich Hammett 2 February 2007 07:12:09 [ permanent link ]
Minun olisi pit nyt tiet , olisi pit nyt tiet , olisi pit nyt tiet KUKA SIN OLET, Trent Woodruff:>>On 1 Feb 2007 07:25:33 -0800, "The Forgotten Rogers" <jeffrey.rogers@gmail.com> wrote:
1.) I think we all know now that "coonass" is a term pretty similar>>to "redneck", not offensive most of the time unless there is specific>>desire to insult. Agreed?
I would agree with that. Then again, my time down here in Mississippi> is probably why.
I lived in Mississippi in metro New Orleans for several years (nearly a decade), and I think it sounds like a perfectly fine term in context, in place, and it's a bunch of out of town whiners who are making a big deal out of it. And Saban has maken his own case worse with his apology to uat fans.
It was occasionally a mildly annoying term to those targeted, on the order of "redneck" or sometimes "trailer trash." I reckon he's recruiting a coonass now, or he wouldn't have apologized. There may be a bama player with a French name soon.
rich -- -to reply, it's hot not warm +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ \ Rich Hammett http://home.hiwaay.net/~rhammett / --I am sick of the self-absorbed city of New York.
Yeah, Eagle@roadrunner.com (J. Hugh Sullivan), well... that's just like... your opinion man.
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 19:23:08 -0000, Onyx_Hokie <onyx_hokie@yahoo.cem>>wrote:>>>[J. Hugh Sullivan (Eagle@roadrunner.com)]>>[Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:30:21 GMT]>>>>> On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:51:36 -0000, Onyx_Hokie <onyx_hokie@yahoo.cem>>>> wrote:>>> >>> >[J. Hugh Sullivan (Eagle@roadrunner.com)]>>> >[Thu, 01 Feb 2007 14:34:47 GMT]>>> >>>> >> >That doesn't even make sense. Try again, bigot.>>> >> >>> >> It takes a little more education than you have to comprehend - a GED>>> >> maybe.>>> >>>> >Trent has already joined the legion of posters who've demonstrated that >>> >they're smarter than you, Hugh... >>> >>> Kiss, kiss, kiss...>>>>Keep trying, Hugh.>>>>I don't always *like* either Trent or Charles in terms of what they have >>to say about this or that, but I'd buy many beers for each of them.>>>>I wouldn't accept one for me bought by you.>>>>-- >>Onyx_Hokie>>>>"To those who have fought for it,>> freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.">>Kiss, kiss, kiss.
Hugh, for SHAME.
This early in 2007 and you're already making a push for the Best Schtick/Catchphrase?
I didn't know you had it in'ya, old timer!
John Rogers AU Class of 1985 The Al Del Greco of Atlanta Deacon Dr. John Flow
"I will choose a path thats clear. I will choose free will."
J. Hugh Sullivan 3 February 2007 19:54:28 [ permanent link ]
On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:28:19 -0500, John Rogers <tiger7_88@yahoo.com> wrote:
Yeah, Eagle@roadrunner.com (J. Hugh Sullivan), well... that's just>like... your opinion man.>>>On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 19:23:08 -0000, Onyx_Hokie <onyx_hokie@yahoo.cem>>>wrote:>>>>>[J. Hugh Sullivan (Eagle@roadrunner.com)]>>>[Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:30:21 GMT]>>>>>>> On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:51:36 -0000, Onyx_Hokie <onyx_hokie@yahoo.cem>>>>> wrote:>>>> >>>> >[J. Hugh Sullivan (Eagle@roadrunner.com)]>>>> >[Thu, 01 Feb 2007 14:34:47 GMT]>>>> >>>>> >> >That doesn't even make sense. Try again, bigot.>>>> >> >>>> >> It takes a little more education than you have to comprehend - a GED>>>> >> maybe.>>>> >>>>> >Trent has already joined the legion of posters who've demonstrated that >>>> >they're smarter than you, Hugh... >>>> >>>> Kiss, kiss, kiss...>>>>>>Keep trying, Hugh.>>>>>>I don't always *like* either Trent or Charles in terms of what they have >>>to say about this or that, but I'd buy many beers for each of them.>>>>>>I wouldn't accept one for me bought by you.>>>>>>-- >>>Onyx_Hokie>>>>>>"To those who have fought for it,>>> freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.">>>>Kiss, kiss, kiss.>>Hugh, for SHAME.>>This early in 2007 and you're already making a push for the Best>Schtick/Catchphrase?>>I didn't know you had it in'ya, old timer!>>>John Rogers
I don't have a choice, John. He ordered me to "Keep trying, Hugh."
As soon as I accuse him of ogling a male derriere with osculatory intent he starts fawning over a guy he castigated not too many days before. C'est la vie.
And I'm sure "...had it in'ya..." had nothing to do with carnal knowledge.
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please . Если Вы хотите пожаловаться на содержимое этой страницы, пожалуйста .
