They start too many cars on these smaller tracks (Bristol, Martinsville, etc.) In the good ole days back in the late 80's they started 30 cars, plenty for a short track. Now they try to cram 43 cars on it is no wonder it becomes a 50% yellow flag race. I know Nascar could never make sponsers happy only starting 30 cars these days but that is the only way to solve the track congestion the small tracks cause. I am in no way saying get rid of the short tracks, I happen to love short tracks but its gotten to where its just congestion, the leader catches the rear of the field in 4 or 5 laps then soembody wrecks due to congestion and the announcers marvel at how 30 cars can stay on the lead lap at a short track. Cut it down to 30 cars and see what happens...
"Computer Guru" <newage@joink.com> wrote in message news:1112889563.49037e403a5ee6a8c90b790811cb78ca@teranews...> They start too many cars on these smaller tracks (Bristol, Martinsville,> etc.) In the good ole days back in the late 80's they started 30 cars,> plenty for a short track. Now they try to cram 43 cars on it is no wonder> it becomes a 50% yellow flag race. I know Nascar could never make sponsers> happy only starting 30 cars these days but that is the only way to solve
track congestion the small tracks cause. I am in no way saying get rid of> the short tracks, I happen to love short tracks but its gotten to where
just congestion, the leader catches the rear of the field in 4 or 5 laps> then soembody wrecks due to congestion and the announcers marvel at how 30> cars can stay on the lead lap at a short track. Cut it down to 30 cars
see what happens...>
I might agree with this if they would go back to starting 70 cars at superspeedways...
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please . Если Вы хотите пожаловаться на содержимое этой страницы, пожалуйста .
