What is the size of a blog?
Re: A look inside the Concorde Agreement
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• GYXU
  • Ñîîáùåñòâà
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Register!

GYXU > F1, Indy, Nascar, Rally > Re: A look inside the Concorde Agreement 30 March 2005 17:15:12

  Recent blog posts: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Ìîäåðàòîð:

Re: A look inside the Concorde Agreement

F2004: 15 of 18*** 28 March 2005 21:28:16
 On 29 Mar 2005 00:55:43 +0950, GD <alfa@melb.somethin­g.au> wrote:>Over the last few days, I've scoured the net for any publically available>informati­on about the contents of the Concorde Agreement. As you'd expect,>I didnt find a copy anywhere, but I did find much more than I expected.>
What was found is placed on the godawful and advertising filled (but free)>http://www.an­gelfire.com/psy/conc­orde/index.html>
This is the nets most thorough and detailed account of the contents of>the agreement. Each clause and schedule has its own page with some>notes and references, but for your viewing pleasure, the raw bones of >it I post here...

...What is claimed to be the source?

Add comment
Gd 29 March 2005 06:05:46 permanent link ]
 "F2004: 15 of 18*·**" <Ron.Dennis@LyingCh­eatingSwine.com> wrote in
news:nnfg41h5hphnij­jg9qtse7lb8a4igdthk6­@4ax.com:
On 29 Mar 2005 00:55:43 +0950, GD <alfa@melb.somethin­g.au> wrote:>>Over the last few days, I've scoured the net for any publically>>availab­le information about the contents of the Concorde Agreement.>
...What is claimed to be the source?

Multiple sources, all detailed on the web site I mentioned.
An interview here, a press conference there, a news item or two , articles,
legal documents etc... all pieced together.



Add comment
F2004: 15 of 18*·** 29 March 2005 08:08:52 permanent link ]
 On 29 Mar 2005 11:55:46 +0950, GD <alfa@melb.somethin­g.au> wrote:>"F2004: 15 of 18*·**" <Ron.Dennis@LyingCh­eatingSwine.com> wrote in>news:nnfg41h5hph­nijjg9qtse7lb8a4igdt­hk6@4ax.com: >> On 29 Mar 2005 00:55:43 +0950, GD <alfa@melb.somethin­g.au> wrote:>>>Over the last few days, I've scoured the net for any publically>>>availa­ble information about the contents of the Concorde Agreement.>>
...What is claimed to be the source?>
Multiple sources, all detailed on the web site I mentioned.

The one you yourself called "godawful"?
An interview here, a press conference there, a news item or two , articles,>legal documents etc... all pieced together.

Yes, I found the footnotes.

Some representative examples:

"[4] Grandprix.com article"

"[11] Article posted to newsgroup fido7.su.formula1"

"[23] Posting to rec.autos.sport.f1 referencing ft.com"

...The answer to my question then is "unsubstantiated rumors and wild
speculations".

Add comment
Fritz 29 March 2005 08:15:50 permanent link ]
 F2004: 15 of 18*·** wrote:
...The answer to my question then is "unsubstantiated rumors and wild> speculations".>

You're just like Bill O'Reilly proclaiming that CBS is unfair and
unbalanced.
How do you live with yourself? Heavy medication I would guess.
--
Fritz
Add comment
Gd 29 March 2005 18:05:26 permanent link ]
 "Bob Dubery" <megapode@gmail.com­> wrote in
news:1112082358.937­803.72210@l41g2000cw­c.googlegroups.com:
GD wrote:
That page is headed "This page lists the publicly available knowledge> about Formula 1 Concorde Agreement."

With the disclaimer that I cant show the 'knowledge' to be fact.

I'm sure they've done their best to be fair and accurate, but nobody> should accept that this IS the Concorde Agreement or even verbatim> extracts from it.

Agreed. And I've said so in the 'about' page. Even the bits that I've
put in italics I can only claim that they *probably* resemble something
close to the original... but nevertheless I stand by my claim that
this stuff I've put together is as close as anyone has come yet to
showing what it looks like.

Remember also of course that much of my sources were
- multiple (even though I may have only bothered to show references for
one or two for each item)
- legal documents
- direct quotes from team bosses or Max Mosely

Having said that, I'd really really like people to examine it thoroughly
and find holes in it... or references that contradict what I have.

Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
respect your talk pals, avoid using obscene language, typing entire messages in CAPS, posting buy/sell ads or violating netiquette or the RF Criminal Code..


GYXU > F1, Indy, Nascar, Rally > Re: A look inside the Concorde Agreement 30 March 2005 17:15:12

see also:
Merry XMAS to everybody and everysoul…
OT - Peterson/White Lightning to field…
jump-skate
pass tests:
see also:

  Copyright © 2001—2009 GYXU
Idea: Miñhael Monashev
See Help and FAQ in the community support.gyxu.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.gyxu.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.gyxu.com.
Information for parents.
Write us at:
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .