What is an Ignore list?
an interesting quote
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• GYXU
  • Ñîîáùåñòâà
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Register!

GYXU > F1, Indy, Nascar, Rally > an interesting quote 23 March 2005 21:15:54

  Recent blog posts: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Ìîäåðàòîð:

an interesting quote

John McCoy 23 March 2005 07:32:17
 Here's one that Cru seems to have missed (from FoxSports, via Ron
Felix's site):

Too Many Rules Says Roush
Jack Roush says NASCAR's rules have taken creativity out of racing. "These
cars are getting more like IROC cars from year to year to year," Roush
says.


Seems to me like I agree with Jack on this one :-)­

John

Add comment
Martin X. Moleski 23 March 2005 08:25:18 permanent link ]
 On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 21:32:17 CST, John McCoy <igopogo@ix.netcom.­com> wrote:
... "These >cars are getting more like IROC cars from year to year to year," Roush >says.
Seems to me like I agree with Jack on this one :-)­

I doubt NASCAR will reverse the trend.

The Car of Tomorrow will put the "stock" back into NASCAR's
formula: NASCAR will issue more and more "stock" parts that
cannot be modified by the teams.

If the trend continues, NASCAR might end up selling boxed
cars. All the teams will be able to do is install their
own seats, steering wheels, and graphics.

I know it goes against the rebel roots of NASCAR, but it
may be the only way to keep costs down.

I think the costs in F1 show what happens when you don't
limit technical development. I think the show would be a lot
less interesting if NASCAR drifts in that direction.

Marty

Add comment
R E D N A L O 23 March 2005 21:15:54 permanent link ]
 On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 21:32:17 CST, John McCoy <igopogo@ix.netcom.­com> wrote:
Here's one that Cru seems to have missed (from FoxSports, via Ron>Felix's site):>
Too Many Rules Says Roush>Jack Roush says NASCAR's rules have taken creativity out of racing. "These >cars are getting more like IROC cars from year to year to year," Roush >says.>
Seems to me like I agree with Jack on this one :-)­>
John

I think I remember participating in discussions in years past in both NASCAR
groups about NASCAR creating cookie cutter cars? I believe that is their
ultimate goal and believe that they should just go ahead and build IROC
type cars for everyone - after all, its just all about the driver, right?

DR
---
Go 24-48
-------------------­--------
Proud Father of a US Marine
--Semper Fi--

Add comment
Phil Rhodes 23 March 2005 22:17:10 permanent link ]
 It's only logical that if you put a design in a wind tunnel, and try to
reduce the drag to the smallest amount, that your end result is going to
look like everyone elses. NASCAR is not about creativity, it's about
competition. Fair and equal competition. What everyone wants to see is a
race to the finish like Atlanta, and no other racing series in the world can
supply that besides NASCAR.

The next big thing in Cup racing is Toyota.

And after that, the next big thing is a smaller engine, but I probably won't
live to see it, lol. It would be hugely expensive. It might even be better
to go to fuel injection, and slow the cars down by restricting fuel flow,
instead of restricting air flow, as carburetors (and restrictor plates) do.
And by the way, how come the Busch cars lap Atlanta as fast as the Cup cars?
I mean they have smaller carburetors, and bigger spoilers - which should
translate to less horsepower and more drag.... but apparently doesn't.

Phil

<r_e_d_n_a_l_o@mchs­i.com> wrote in message
news:go83415tol6n0v­jbueg72q0vonmip9domh­@4ax.com...> On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 21:32:17 CST, John McCoy <igopogo@ix.netcom.­com> > wrote:>
Here's one that Cru seems to have missed (from FoxSports, via Ron>>Felix's site):>>
Too Many Rules Says Roush>>Jack Roush says NASCAR's rules have taken creativity out of racing. "These>>cars are getting more like IROC cars from year to year to year," Roush>>says.>>
Seems to me like I agree with Jack on this one :-)­>>
John>
I think I remember participating in discussions in years past in both > NASCAR> groups about NASCAR creating cookie cutter cars? I believe that is their> ultimate goal and believe that they should just go ahead and build IROC> type cars for everyone - after all, its just all about the driver, right?>
---> Go 24-48> -------------------­--------> Proud Father of a US Marine> --Semper Fi-->


Add comment
DollarBill 24 March 2005 00:39:29 permanent link ]
 "Phil Rhodes" <p.rhodes@NOSPAMcom­cast.net> wrote in message
news:BfCdnY_R8doJM9­zfRVn-3w@comcast.com­...

<snip>
And by the way, how come the Busch cars lap Atlanta as fast as the Cup > cars? I mean they have smaller carburetors, and bigger spoilers - which > should translate to less horsepower and more drag.... but apparently > doesn't.

Oh boy...here we go with another physics discussion!


Add comment
John McCoy 24 March 2005 04:48:33 permanent link ]
 "Phil Rhodes" <p.rhodes@NOSPAMcom­cast.net> wrote in
news:BfCdnY_R8doJM9­zfRVn-3w@comcast.com­:
It's only logical that if you put a design in a wind tunnel, and try> to reduce the drag to the smallest amount, that your end result is> going to look like everyone elses.

Y'know, you'd think that. But funny things happen. A few years
back in F1, everyone thought the right thing was to get the front
wing down close the ground - according to the wind tunnel, the
lower the better. Then someone found out that if you raise the
center of the wing, you get better airflow around the carbody...
quite the opposite of the conventional wisdom. You have to have
some rules freedom, or no-one will ever find things like that.
And after that, the next big thing is a smaller engine, but I probably> won't live to see it, lol. It would be hugely expensive.

Robert Yates, who knows a thing or two about engines, says they
can go to 265 CID without any major changes or expense.

You'll likely see a smaller engine at the same time you see a
Toyota, but it probably won't be much smaller, and it probably
won't change anything (but it'll annoy the teams a fair bit).

John

Add comment
Phil Rhodes 24 March 2005 15:24:42 permanent link ]
 In F1, everyone doesn't have EXACTLY the same wings, they only have height,
length and width restrictions. Getting maximum downforce on the front wing
and then getting the air to flow over and THROUGH the car and then get
maximum downforce on the rear wing is becoming an art! The race cars look
vastly different, and apparently they are. They also aren't on the same
tire, which is even more important - what with last years Jaguar (Red Bull
Racing) on Michelins whipping last years Ferrari on Bridgestones
(Firestones?) in Malaysia last weekend.

In NASCAR the spoiler is EXACTLY the same (and it doesn't work like a wing),
both in size and angle, but I'm not positive they are the same height off
the road, but it sure looks like it. Pontiacs used to have a better
clearance with their front air dam, but they're gone. The riding height of
the front dam looks VERY simular on all cars (as do fender flares, etc.)
This makes for EXTREMELY close competition, and forces Crew Chief to....
well enough said.

Phil

"John McCoy" <igopogo@ix.netcom.­com> wrote in message
news:Xns9622C7E6D3A­3Dpogosupernews@216.­168.3.30...> "Phil Rhodes" <p.rhodes@NOSPAMcom­cast.net> wrote in> news:BfCdnY_R8doJM9­zfRVn-3w@comcast.com­:>
It's only logical that if you put a design in a wind tunnel, and try>> to reduce the drag to the smallest amount, that your end result is>> going to look like everyone elses.>
Y'know, you'd think that. But funny things happen. A few years> back in F1, everyone thought the right thing was to get the front> wing down close the ground - according to the wind tunnel, the> lower the better. Then someone found out that if you raise the> center of the wing, you get better airflow around the carbody...> quite the opposite of the conventional wisdom. You have to have> some rules freedom, or no-one will ever find things like that.>
And after that, the next big thing is a smaller engine, but I probably>> won't live to see it, lol. It would be hugely expensive.>
Robert Yates, who knows a thing or two about engines, says they> can go to 265 CID without any major changes or expense.>
You'll likely see a smaller engine at the same time you see a> Toyota, but it probably won't be much smaller, and it probably> won't change anything (but it'll annoy the teams a fair bit).>
John>


Add comment
John McCoy 25 March 2005 04:22:49 permanent link ]
 "Phil Rhodes" <p.rhodes@NOSPAMcom­cast.net> wrote in
news:0pOdnWN4oZPRtd­_fRVn-rg@comcast.com­:

I fear my point was a tad too obscure. You had written:
It's only logical that if you put a design in a wind tunnel, and try>>> to reduce the drag to the smallest amount, that your end result is>>> going to look like everyone elses.

That is neither logical nor true. My comment on F1 was an example
of that being not so, and it's the same in NASCAR. If the goal is
to reduce drag, and you let 10 NASCAR teams loose in wind tunnels,
you'd get 8 pretty similar looking cars, and two with something
different.

The reason everything looks the same in NASCAR is because the
rules, now, require it to look the same; it has nothing to do
with the abilities of the designers. Were NASCAR to give the
teams some freedom, as in F1, then different things would be tried.

Roush's comment (that started the thread) was basically that he
wants some freedom to try things.

John

Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
respect your talk pals, avoid using obscene language, typing entire messages in CAPS, posting buy/sell ads or violating netiquette or the RF Criminal Code..


GYXU > F1, Indy, Nascar, Rally > an interesting quote 23 March 2005 21:15:54

see also:
[R] Scottish FA Cup Round 2
Canadian Unicycling 'Agression'…
pass tests:
see also:
ONOTOLE NEGODUE

  Copyright © 2001—2009 GYXU
Idea: Miñhael Monashev
See Help and FAQ in the community support.gyxu.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.gyxu.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.gyxu.com.
Information for parents.
Write us at:
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .