Why does a page with many pictures get wider?
Re: WORLDS UPDATES
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• GYXU
  • Сообщества
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Register!

GYXU > General > Re: WORLDS UPDATES 11 August 2008 22:11:43

  Top users: 
  Recent blog posts: 
  They have birthday today: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Модератор:

Re: WORLDS UPDATES

Frank Huguenard 4 August 2008 19:24:24
 Really, Cheating?

Jam?

Sockeye?

Who knew?



<winterleague@hotma­il.com> wrote in message
news:77d9e179-6ce5-­4c0a-b4ba-f023f60910­c4@v26g2000prm.googl­egroups.com...
On Aug 4, 8:17 am, joadnt...@ec.rr.com­ wrote:
On Aug 4, 9:46 am, "BlockStack.TV" <euro...@gmail.com>­ wrote:.
GB beat Columbia 11-7 but it was a tough match and a bit scrappy as
well. Columbia have tons of energy but possibly not so much of an
understanding of the rules. There was a bit of drama.
uhm, drama that probably avoided with impartial 3rd party arbitration.
when ya gonna learn wfdf

seriously. will there be a repeat of the "worst, cheatingist final
ever" 11 years after it went down? sockeye vs. jam, club worlds final
right there in vancouver?

wfdf won't even use observers - it's not an option.


Add comment
Frank Huguenard 4 August 2008 19:55:46 permanent link ]
 It doesn't help that the UPA promotes on their website "Ultimate in 10 easy
rules" that contradict the actual rules.


"Handy" <Xckack@hotmail.com­> wrote in message
news:074c7bf0-99f1-­4629-8650-6f4e6cab7d­73@z11g2000prl.googl­egroups.com...
On Aug 4, 8:17 am, joadnt...@ec.rr.com­ wrote:
On Aug 4, 9:46 am, "BlockStack.TV" <euro...@gmail.com>­ wrote:.
GB beat Columbia 11-7 but it was a tough match and a bit scrappy as
well. Columbia have tons of energy but possibly not so much of an
understanding of the rules. There was a bit of drama.
uhm, drama that probably avoided with impartial 3rd party arbitration.
when ya gonna learn wfdf

The major problem in this case isn't refs, it's that people playin the
game don't even know the rules! There's no one in the NFL, NBA,
etc... or at any college level (or even the high school level?) or
possibly any other "organized" sport where people don't bother to
learn the rules to the sport they spend hours training and playing in.

That crap is completely ridiculous. Don't waste your money unless
you're going to spend the time to learn to play.

-Handy


Add comment
Frank Huguenard 4 August 2008 22:06:54 permanent link ]
 The worst "rule" that is broken is when a player makes a call that he
believes is against the rules and isn't and there is no penalty for this
either and nothing the opposing team can do about it.

"pete" <schuhmannp@uncw.ed­u> wrote in message
news:69edbdbc-ea4f-­4895-b4b1-939238b7de­ab@w7g2000hsa.google­groups.com...
The major problem in this case isn't refs, it's that people playin the
game don't even know the rules! There's no one in the NFL, NBA,
etc... or at any college level (or even the high school level?) or
possibly any other "organized" sport where people don't bother to
learn the rules to the sport they spend hours training and playing in.
That crap is completely ridiculous. Don't waste your money unless
you're going to spend the time to learn to play.
So true. I think part of this has to be the lack of incentives to
learn the rules.
There are basically no penalties for breaking "rules" in ultimate,
most conflict situations end in a do-over anyway, so why bother
learning the rules? There's really no reason to.


Add comment
Frank Huguenard 4 August 2008 23:05:06 permanent link ]
 Again, if you go back through this thread, it was Handy and others who
diverted the discussion to talk about cheaters, players self-reffing a game
that they don't even know the rules to, etc.


"MD" <postingrsd@yahoo.c­om> wrote in message
news:d88211e5-2f47-­4615-b6a7-8079a99949­b4@8g2000hse.googleg­roups.com...

It states that it is illegal to run with the disc. This is simply not
true.
It states that picks are prohibited. This also is not true (picks are
prohibited when the offensive player is within 3 meters of the defender).
Lastly (and I know that this is a stale old argument) it says that
Ultimate
is a non-contact sport. Patently untrue.


Thread hijacking at its finest.


Add comment
Frank Huguenard 4 August 2008 23:12:02 permanent link ]
 These stats are pretty lame and misleading.

An assist should be awarded (like basketball) to the player who threw to the
player putting up the shot. If you want to differentiate between thrower
and receiver, then count the receiver as 'goals' and the thrower as
'scores'.

Where are:

number of throws
number of turnovers
throwing percentage
number of blocks
number of minutes played (or points played)
number of fouls

I'd hate to be accused of thread jacking here but after all, we are talking
about the ever important topic of WORLDs. As in, this is the so called
world championships and the best, the very best they have to offer us with
regards to 'meaningful' statistics is goals and throws for goals?

What a complete joke this sport is.

"Shy" <daniel_chazin@pitz­er.edu> wrote in message
news:cbca21b1-2132-­4897-8ffe-dc4df73162­15@z11g2000prl.googl­egroups.com...
To bring it back to the ever important topic of worlds, has anyone
noticed Japan's Junior Women's Team...look at those stats thus far,
Highlights include:
Yumi Amada with 14 goals and 3 assists in 3 and a third games,
interesting...


Add comment
Frank Huguenard 5 August 2008 00:12:42 permanent link ]
 This has nothing to do with HATE.

That your heart is filled with hate when you react to my posts is more about
you than it is about me, isn't it?

I'm hell-bent on improving Ultimate. What are you doing to make the game
better?


<srapson@gmail.com>­ wrote in message
news:e03498e4-9884-­47dc-ae94-74fe3a4415­b3@d1g2000hsg.google­groups.com...
On Aug 4, 3:12 pm, "Frank Huguenard"
<fhuguenard(no_spam­)@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
...
I'd hate to be accused of thread jacking here but after all, we are
talking
about the ever important topic of WORLDs.
...

Frank. The thread is called Worlds *Updates*. As in scores, write-ups
and anecdotes from worlds. Not rants about how ultimate is not the
game you want it to be.

If you want to keep blathering create a thread titled "Frank bitching
about ultimate" and spew hate to your hearts content.

In the meantime, shut your hole.


Add comment
Frankie 7 August 2008 07:38:30 permanent link ]
 
The story was the Sockeye offense, only 2 turns the entire game,

And 50 traveling violations. Come on Michael, that's 52 turnovers in my
book.

Cheat to win baby.


Add comment
Frankie 9 August 2008 17:50:23 permanent link ]
 
<joadntoad@ec.rr.co­m> wrote in message
news:3e47e65f-7206-­4a7f-86f6-8355870efa­81@y38g2000hsy.googl­egroups.com...
On Aug 9, 9:56 am, "Frankie" <billy_berrou(no_sp­am)@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:.

And to add, in NO WAY do observers help the above situation.


well its better than nothing. isnt an overruled travel call a
completion......and­ if it were for a goal, wouldnt it still
count.....wasnt that one of the soc/bb senerios?

It was my understanding that the scores were indirect, in other words the
throw to the 'assist' [such a stupid description of throwing a score, Did
Joe Montana get an 'assist' when he threw a touchdown to Jerry Ric? fricken
idiots but I digress] was where the traveling call was, not the actual score
itself. The play stops, defense sets up, gets to rest, etc. Advantage
cheaters.

-but yea......refzervers­ are the bare minimum in which the call is at
least active. next they just got to grow some balls and make it a
turn when violated.

Something other than having it end like it did. Pretty fucking meaningless.
30 years of this crap.


Add comment
Frankie 10 August 2008 04:32:26 permanent link ]
 Not to mention cheating.

Easily over ONE HUNDRED traveling violations.


<dgw409@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:82367276-34c2-­4d69-9285-229e088daa­30@m3g2000hsc.google­groups.com...
big sloppy win for Canada. Well done. Some pretty sketch calls
throughout the game from the fish but amazingly insane D as well.
Fewer turns and more patience with the disc win it for the red and
white. Great decisions with the disc and waiting for the open man
really won it for Furious.


Add comment
Frankie 10 August 2008 20:07:32 permanent link ]
 How can you honestly say Canada was in control when they cheated as much as
they did.

OK, maybe the two go hand in hand, because they cheated so much, of course
they were in control.

I only saw on bad call by Sockeye. The first foul call was pretty weak.

The second foul call where the Canada player flattened the Sockeye player
after he got the D was still a foul. Where in the rules does it say you're
able to clobber the offensive player as long as you get to the disc first?
This is supposed to be non-contact, not non-contact as long as you get to
the disc first.

The other sockeye calls were for traveling which Canada was doing all game
long.

"Nirvana" <jziskind@gmail.com­> wrote in message
news:58720eb8-415c-­4ce9-96f8-6c023dfa76­95@p10g2000prf.googl­egroups.com...
Canada seemed to be clearly in control the entire game until some
really awful calls by Seth Crockford made the game close. I would like
to say that Sockeye played a bad game but honestly Canada just looked
amazing out there. Derek Alexander and Mike Grant were the two best
players on the field. But I still think the story of the game was Nord
looking straight-up terrible. He was scored on at least 4 or 5 times
and didn't even have any spectacular bids because he was so far behind
Mike Grant all game. I was not expecting that at all.


Add comment
Frankie 10 August 2008 20:57:17 permanent link ]
 I think Canada stills wins this game if they don't travel but we'll never
know, will we?

Competition can only be apples-to-apples comparisons. You can't have one
team playing by a different set of rules than the other.

Oh, and KD couldn't carry my jock Todd. Don't even get me started. And I
don't cheat so don't include me in your convoluted thinking.

<joadntoad@ec.rr.co­m> wrote in message
news:47d45cc6-280f-­4dbc-86bf-da821e61a9­32@m3g2000hsc.google­groups.com...
On Aug 10, 1:07 pm, "Frankie" <billy_berrou(no_sp­am)@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
The other sockeye calls were for traveling which Canada was doing all game
long.

yea, that 44 guy was takin a train every time he got the disc.

i wonder how outcomes like this would have been altered with the
solstice "refzerver" type facilitation in which travels are actively
enforced. I guess maybe not all that much with such soft consequences


Add comment
Frankie 10 August 2008 22:06:55 permanent link ]
 
<joadntoad@ec.rr.co­m> wrote in message
news:0e625771-41f7-­48be-b3ef-f849b95872­cb@r66g2000hsg.googl­egroups.com...
On Aug 10, 1:57 pm, "Frankie" <billy_berrou(no_sp­am)@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
I think Canada stills wins this game if they don't travel but we'll never
know, will we?

--even if travels were turns?

Sure. Canadians just wouldn't have traveled. They would have learned a
long time ago not to do it.

My point is that the Canadians looked like the better/stronger team. It
would have just been nice to see some real competition instead of
make-believe.

-------------------­--------------------­----------
Competition can only be apples-to-apples comparisons. You can't have one
team playing by a different set of rules than the other.


-which is usually the case in ultimate.....to a certian extent.

yep. which is why I think observers are a joke. observers come from teams
who all have their own variant of the rules.
-------------------­--------------------­------
Oh, and KD couldn't carry my jock Todd. Don't even get me started.

--i think i already did. are you saying that you are the best ultimate
player to ever touch a disc? Is there anyone that was better than
yourself?

There's probably a lot better than me but KD is not one of them.


-------------------­--------------------­--------



And I
don't cheat so don't include me in your convoluted thinking.

c'mon now.......you never cheated in ultimate even once????, never
went off sides or ANYTHING?????

Maybe a long time ago but I have not willfully cheated in many, many years.
I don't need to. I'm pretty enough without it.


Add comment
Frankie 11 August 2008 21:05:59 permanent link ]
 Yes I have.

I played goalimate against him and beat him (including a foot block; he was
kind of stunned) a few years ago in santa cruz. It was a furious team
against me and the santa cruz second stringers.


"jacob" <jacobsider@gmail.c­om> wrote in message
news:72709c7a-88e7-­49be-aa0f-92a2defd1e­4b@h17g2000prg.googl­egroups.com...
Has Frank H ever matched up against Mike Grant?


Add comment
Frankie 11 August 2008 22:11:43 permanent link ]
 That's very funny. You're on a roll today.


"jacob" <jacobsider@gmail.c­om> wrote in message
news:4141f90f-4c16-­4b24-aec4-a9e601ee27­56@a3g2000prm.google­groups.com...
"Jacob has a tendency to wax poetic about Cribber but that's pretty
nuts. Dennis, besides being a complete jerk, was a one dimensional
player."
That's not true; Cribber is an incomplete jerk.


Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
Пожалуйста, относитесь к собеседникам уважительно, не используйте нецензурные слова, не злоупотребляйте заглавными буквами, не публикуйте рекламу и объявления о купле/продаже, а также материалы нарушающие сетевой этикет или законы РФ. Ваш ip-адрес записывается.


GYXU > General > Re: WORLDS UPDATES 11 August 2008 22:11:43

see also:
Re: the new CFL commissionner
Igloo base camp in the Alps
SALOMON skates
pass tests:
see also:
Hi.....

  Copyright © 2001—2010 GYXU
Идея: Монашёв Михаил.
Авторами текстов, изображений и видео, размещённых на этой странице, являются пользователи сайта.
See Help and FAQ in the community support.gyxu.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.gyxu.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.gyxu.com.
Information for parents.
Пишите нам на .
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .
Если Вы хотите пожаловаться на содержимое этой страницы, пожалуйста .