rings included,Cranks not crank arms,ring sizes are 53/39 thanks "Guy F. Anderson Sr." <ganderso@toast.net> wrote in message news:m8om31940fpt7dad06tdr2ssg7hog7sg25@4ax.com...> On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 17:15:07 -0500, "maggie" <maggie002@comcast.net>> wrote:>
Guy F . Anderson Sr . 20 March 2005 01:08:30 [ permanent link ]
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 19:16:22 -0500, "maggie" <maggie002@comcast.net> wrote:
rings included,Cranks not crank arms,ring sizes are 53/39 thanks
To be 100% clear---crank arms and rings together are a "crankset". Arms only are frequently called "cranks". Hence the unclarity in your original post. Thanks!
so sorry "Guy F. Anderson Sr." <ganderso@toast.net> wrote in message news:5r4p31p5fsu06je8bc05mae1g0drtft6ve@4ax.com...> On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 19:16:22 -0500, "maggie" <maggie002@comcast.net>> wrote:>
rings included,Cranks not crank arms,ring sizes are 53/39 thanks>
To be 100% clear---crank arms and rings together are a "crankset".> Arms only are frequently called "cranks". Hence the unclarity in your> original post. Thanks!>