Just woke up and checked cricinfo for the score and was greeted with this, so I clicked on the link to see the disaster, but instead I see a night watchman who scored 35 (Gillespie) Clarke 21, Katich (35), Warne (1) and a nice partnership between Gilly and Kaspa and a 60 odd run lead.
Now, these are hardly Earth shattering scores, Dizzy could fell well pleased, Warne is always hit and miss - but to say that NZ "blasted through the lower order"? Strange choice of wording.
"Mike Price" <mickp@nospamiinet.net.au> wrote in message news:ja0f415ed2srmqlfp7vuem7th1keh04bnb@4ax.com...> "NZ Blast through lower order">
Just woke up and checked cricinfo for the score and was greeted with> this, so I clicked on the link to see the disaster, but instead I see> a night watchman who scored 35 (Gillespie) Clarke 21, Katich (35),> Warne (1) and a nice partnership between Gilly and Kaspa and a 60 odd> run lead.>
Now, these are hardly Earth shattering scores, Dizzy could fell well> pleased, Warne is always hit and miss - but to say that NZ "blasted> through the lower order"? Strange choice of wording.
By Kiwi standard that is 'blasting through the lower order'.
