Here is a list of Test matches in which the first innings totals were within 10 runs of each other, however, one side ended up losing the match by 200 or more runs or 8 or more wickets.
Eng (362 & 452-9d) bt Aus (353 & 262) Sydney 2002-03 225r Eng (169 & 360) bt Aus (164 & 160) Adelaide 1978-79 205r WI (222 & 443-7d) bt Ind (222 & 240) Kanpur 1958-59 203r
WI (136 & 98-1) bt Aus (128 & 105) Port-of-Spain 1994-95 9wkts Aus (432 & 135-1) bt NZ (433 & 131) Christchurch 2004-05 9wkts WI (410 & 317-2) bt Pak (408 & 318) Georgetown 1957-58 8wkts Eng (226 & 93-2) bt WI (224 & 94) Bridgetown 2003-04 8wkts
"Aslam Siddiqui" <asiddiqu@iupui.edu> wrote in message news:1111352600.827657.16380@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...> Here is a list of Test matches in which the first innings totals were> within 10 runs of each other, however, one side ended up losing the> match by 200 or more runs or 8 or more wickets.>
Eng (362 & 452-9d) bt Aus (353 & 262) Sydney 2002-03 225r
In article <HUr%d.105331$Bk7.16629@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk>, Alan OBrien says...
"Aslam Siddiqui" <asiddiqu@iupui.edu> wrote in message > news:1111352600.827657.16380@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...> > Here is a list of Test matches in which the first innings totals were> > within 10 runs of each other, however, one side ended up losing the> > match by 200 or more runs or 8 or more wickets.> >
Eng (362 & 452-9d) bt Aus (353 & 262) Sydney 2002-03 225r>
Is there a mistake somewhere here?
Aslam has finally revealed he's an Aussie hater and docked Aus runs when Steve Waugh ran on the pitch after scoring his ton.
