Ghambir's Dismissal

What blogs can I read?

Hello Guest

• Login
• Register…
• Start blog

• Who, Where, When
• What is interesting here?
• Duels

• Polls
• Avatars
• Interests

• Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search

• Search
• Games
• Tests
• GYXU

• Сообщества
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online

GYXU > Cricket > Ghambir's Dismissal 16 March 2005 20:39:29

Recent blog posts:

pipiska!!!upja4ka!!!pshli…
pipiska!!!upja4ka!!!pshli nax!!!

UPJA4KA!!!
TUTSJAPI6!!PI6!ZEPJ EBRILO!!!!!ZAZA!!!TELOIDI, DA! MY – EBANULISJ!!!PI6! PI6! PI6! OJAEBU!!I…

Hi!
Hi! I am Kate from Ukraine! I don't now, everything about this website. Also I dodn't know english very…

...
http://gyxu.com/p/login.cgi?r=http://www.winxclub.com/

ONOTOLE NEGODUE
Blin, nu zaipali trabli s ssilkami.Zaxozu kuda to - BAZ! i ja snova gostj.Vxozu i vse norma,no…

4to za xerj ?
Menja 4asto vikidivaet !!!X-(

Sri Lanka Vs West Indies
Sri Lanka won the first match by more than 100 runs…this is first in West Indies. .unfortunately after…

...
gfgdgd

Fs:,Iphone 8Gb,Nokia…
BUY 2 GET 1 FREE We Are Importer And Exporter Of All Kinds Of Mobile Phones Games,And All…

Blog Feed
http://feeds.feedburner.com/TumbleweedRealtyMaui

Forums:

topic feeds

• GYXU all topics, blogs and comments

• General

• F1, Indy, Nascar, Rally

• Baseball

• Basketball

• Boxing

• Football

• Soccer

• Hockey

• Rugby

• Tennis

• Pro Wrestling

• Billiard

• Cycling

• Boats

• Kites, widsurfing, waterski

• Diving

• Skiing

• Cricket

• Golf

• Skating

• Buy / Sell

• Anonymous

Discuss:

How come...
Akhtar/Murali have actions that are not dodgy sometimes, but still chuck an odd one (and and even one…

Hindus Are Praying To Their…
Hindus Are Praying To Their Gods For An Obama Win - Accuses American Christian Pastor…

Recent forum topics:

Hoffman's High Hemologin Values
Does any of our Scandinavian friends know about Christian Hoffman being recently banned from racing for…

Steel bolts and nuts for Ultima…
The now discontinued Jackson Ultima Matrix mounts (for removable figure skating blade runners) held the…

Stockholm-Falun scoring system…
Kowalczyk overcame Majdic to win the overall WC title because she got the 200 bonus points for the…

Worn Rotefella Boots
Dear All, just back from an excellent trip to Norway. One problem, in heavy snow, very difficult to…

Recent forum comments:

RE: Season opener?
On Mar 19, 7:07pm, garystanislaw...@gmail.com wrote: Hey thats great! hope to see you out…

RE: Season opener?
On Mar 20, 8:24am, Zephyr <davedejo...@hotmail.com> wrote:

RE: Season opener?
I sail Cass sometimes before jet ski season, but not sure if it's open yet. Maybe I'll see you there…

RE: Hoffman's High Hemologin Values
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:49:37 -0700 (PDT), ADK Skier <lgsumr@yahoo.com> wrote: Kikkan Randall…

RE: Hoffman's High Hemologin Values
I'll stay out of that one. Some February lab test results - in the midst of races - showed my…

RE: Hoffman's High Hemologin Values
ADK Skier wrote: The real problem wasn't a high hemo value, but the wrong ratio between what I…

RE: Hoffman's High Hemologin Values
On Mar 23, 3:11pm, Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> wrote: Thanks Terje…

RE: Worn Rotefella Boots
Neil wrote: Yes indeed! Normally it was sufficient to press the binding further down, i.e. tighten…

RE: Worn Rotefella Boots
Thanks for the suggestion. Looking at the boot tip in the cold light of day, the rubber is worn and the…

RE: OT: Ordnance Survey wallpaper
"Robert Treharne Jones" <tjwizard@tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message…

Модератор:

Administrator


Ghambir's Dismissal
Halekala 16 March 2005 09:22:03
	Why big mouth Rameez is not talking about front foot LBW now? He chatted up a lot when Inzy was given out last test! Best Regards, Halekala
		Add comment


CiL 16 March 2005 10:08:11 [ permanent link ]
	On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:22:03 -0500, "Halekala" <halekala@volcano.com> wrote: Why big mouth Rameez is not talking about front foot LBW now? He chatted up>a lot when Inzy was given out last test!> I dont know what you are hinting at, but that was out (dont even know for sure whether you are claiming its not ) . pitched on line , middle n leg and was hitting the stumps. Best Regards,>Halekala>
		Add comment


Vinay 16 March 2005 10:33:24 [ permanent link ]
	"CiL" <cricketislife@rediffmail.com> wrote in message news:j8jf31lcb9h51sfff1kc33i116qrmdv4g1@4ax.com...> On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:22:03 -0500, "Halekala" <halekala@volcano.com>> wrote:> Why big mouth Rameez is not talking about front foot LBW now? He chatted >>up>>a lot when Inzy was given out last test!>> I dont know what you are hinting at, but that was out (dont even know> for sure whether you are claiming its not ) . I think Halekala is referring to the difference in Rameez's reaction at Gambhir's dismissal as compared to Inzy's dismissal in T1. On that occassion, some people felt Inzy should not have been given out lbw because he was forward. Gambhir was just as forward today, and Kaneria spins and bounces the ball more than Kumble does, which makes an even stronger case. IMHO both were clearly out. Btw, great pick by Bucknor not to give DRavid lbw - it was easy to miss that inside edge. He must have caught that edge because otherwise it seemed plumb. In all the noise that too. Vinay
		Add comment


Guest 16 March 2005 19:10:36 [ permanent link ]
	Yes the method of dismissal of gambhir was indeed more debatable than inzmam. My pick is that in both case the batsman were out. If some ex player are worried that batsman cannot be gven out on front foot, than go ahead and make rule for it,instead critisizing the umpire. both decision were correct by rule. If umpire stops giving lbw to batsman playing on front foot , then batsman will casually play spinner on front footwith pad even if ball is hitting middle stump.In first inning decision inzmam was not even attempting the shot. If they are really so much worried abt umpiring why dont the recomend hawkeye to ICC.
		Add comment


Halekala 16 March 2005 20:39:29 [ permanent link ]
	<pankaj4ublue@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1110985836.306529.143590@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...> Yes the method of dismissal of gambhir was indeed more debatable than> inzmam. My pick is that in both case the batsman were out. If some ex> player are worried that batsman cannot be gven out on front foot, than> go ahead and make rule for it,instead critisizing the umpire. both> decision were correct by rule. If umpire stops giving lbw to batsman> playing on front foot , then batsman will casually play spinner on> front footwith pad even if ball is hitting middle stump.In first inning> decision inzmam was not even attempting the shot. If they are really so> much worried abt umpiring why dont the recomend hawkeye to ICC.> Vinay and Pankaj, you are both right. I was merely pointing out Rameez's stupidity. Both were out, only this time he was way too quiet! True idiot, what else. H
		Add comment

GYXU > Cricket > Ghambir's Dismissal 16 March 2005 20:39:29

	see also: Blake-Nadal - what is the score?? Re: Another Blake and Nadal tomorrow Re: Nadal has the talent to be...		pass tests:		see also: http://demish.gyxu.com/i/temp/2/128... ... ...

Copyright © 2001—2009 GYXU
Idea: Miсhael Monashev
See Help and FAQ in the community support.gyxu.com.
Write in the community about the bugs you have noticedbugs.gyxu.com.
Write your offers and comments in the communities suggest.gyxu.com.
Information for parents.
Write us at:

If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .




Get comments by e-mail Add to favourites

respect your talk pals, avoid using obscene language, typing entire messages in CAPS, posting buy/sell ads or violating netiquette or the RF Criminal Code..

Ghambir's Dismissal

Add new comment