I don't have the s/n with me, but I've identified this engine as a 1982> Johnson 235. It was remanufactured by a professional company sometime> in the more recent past.>
This question doesn't really matter, because the engine works fine, but> I'm curious. I've been lead to believe this is a cross flow engine> because OMC didn't build loopers in the V-6's until the mid-80s? I've> kind of oriented myself to looper vs. cross flow and see an obvious> difference is the surface of the piston: cross flow have a dome sort of> shape, while loopers are essentially flat. When I look through my> spark plug holes, the pistons appear dead flat. >
- "Camilo" <campascual@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1115677920.654661.4080@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...>I don't have the s/n with me, but I've identified this engine as a 1982> Johnson 235. It was remanufactured by a professional company sometime> in the more recent past.>
This question doesn't really matter, because the engine works fine, but> I'm curious. I've been lead to believe this is a cross flow engine> because OMC didn't build loopers in the V-6's until the mid-80s? I've> kind of oriented myself to looper vs. cross flow and see an obvious> difference is the surface of the piston: cross flow have a dome sort of> shape, while loopers are essentially flat. When I look through my> spark plug holes, the pistons appear dead flat.>
On 9 May 2005 15:32:00 -0700, "Camilo" <campascual@yahoo.com> wrote:
I don't have the s/n with me, but I've identified this engine as a 1982>Johnson 235. It was remanufactured by a professional company sometime>in the more recent past.
I had four of these hung of a 30' Eliminator. It would run 180 mph.
