WASHINGTON -- White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan says President Bush was "pleased" with the latest investigation that blames CIA analysts for the false information that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.
That's the reason Bush invaded Iraq, remember? Once again it's those low-level bureaucrats who took us into war. And once again a panel of "don't rock the boat" establishment figures has let the commander in chief off the hook.
Any other president would have blown his stack. Instead, Bush honored former CIA Director George Tenet with the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
WASHINGTON -- White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan says President > Bush was "pleased" with the latest investigation that blames CIA > analysts for the false information that Iraq had weapons of mass > destruction.>
That's the reason Bush invaded Iraq, remember? Once again it's those > low-level bureaucrats who took us into war. And once again a panel of > "don't rock the boat" establishment figures has let the commander in > chief off the hook.>
Any other president would have blown his stack. Instead, Bush honored > former CIA Director George Tenet with the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
WASHINGTON -- White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan says President >> Bush was "pleased" with the latest investigation that blames CIA >> analysts for the false information that Iraq had weapons of mass >> destruction.>>
That's the reason Bush invaded Iraq, remember? Once again it's those >> low-level bureaucrats who took us into war. And once again a panel of >> "don't rock the boat" establishment figures has let the commander in >> chief off the hook.>>
Any other president would have blown his stack. Instead, Bush honored >> former CIA Director George Tenet with the Presidential Medal of Freedom.>
You needed additional proof Bush was a numnutz?
30,000 off topic post to rec.boats prove that you are a numnutz. You are trying to destroy it.
WASHINGTON -- White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan says President >Bush was "pleased" with the latest investigation that blames CIA >analysts for the false information that Iraq had weapons of mass >destruction.>
That's the reason Bush invaded Iraq, remember? Once again it's those >low-level bureaucrats who took us into war. And once again a panel of >"don't rock the boat" establishment figures has let the commander in >chief off the hook.>
Any other president would have blown his stack. Instead, Bush honored >former CIA Director George Tenet with the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
Why? If the investigation was well conducted, why would 'any other president have blown his stack'? Would any other president have wanted a *crappy* investigation?
Being pleased with the performance of the investigators does not mean being pleased with the providers of bad information.
If Tenet had just been fired, you'd be complaining that Bush did it because Tenet was a Clinton hire. \
Get off it, Jimcomma. -- John H
"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."
WASHINGTON -- White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan says President >>Bush was "pleased" with the latest investigation that blames CIA >>analysts for the false information that Iraq had weapons of mass >>destruction.>>
That's the reason Bush invaded Iraq, remember? Once again it's those >>low-level bureaucrats who took us into war. And once again a panel of >>"don't rock the boat" establishment figures has let the commander in >>chief off the hook.>>
Any other president would have blown his stack. Instead, Bush honored >>former CIA Director George Tenet with the Presidential Medal of Freedom.>
Why? If the investigation was well conducted, why would 'any other president> have blown his stack'? Would any other president have wanted a *crappy*> investigation?>
Being pleased with the performance of the investigators does not mean being> pleased with the providers of bad information. >
If Tenet had just been fired, you'd be complaining that Bush did it because> Tenet was a Clinton hire. \>
Get off it, Jimcomma.
Didja ever think he might have "blown his stack" with the results of the investigation which told him he had a bunch of incompetents working for him? Instead he was happy with the cover up.
WASHINGTON -- White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan says President >>>Bush was "pleased" with the latest investigation that blames CIA >>>analysts for the false information that Iraq had weapons of mass >>>destruction.>>>
That's the reason Bush invaded Iraq, remember? Once again it's those >>>low-level bureaucrats who took us into war. And once again a panel of >>>"don't rock the boat" establishment figures has let the commander in >>>chief off the hook.>>>
Any other president would have blown his stack. Instead, Bush honored >>>former CIA Director George Tenet with the Presidential Medal of Freedom.>>
Why? If the investigation was well conducted, why would 'any other president>> have blown his stack'? Would any other president have wanted a *crappy*>> investigation?>>
Being pleased with the performance of the investigators does not mean being>> pleased with the providers of bad information. >>
If Tenet had just been fired, you'd be complaining that Bush did it because>> Tenet was a Clinton hire. \>>
Get off it, Jimcomma. >
Didja ever think he might have "blown his stack" with the results of the >investigation which told him he had a bunch of incompetents working for >him? Instead he was happy with the cover up.>
Appears the article went over your head John
Would you have felt better if Kerry had won? Or if Kerry had led the investigation?
Are you saying the investigation found fault in the wrong place? Do you know *what* you're saying? -- John H
"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."
WASHINGTON -- White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan says President >>>>Bush was "pleased" with the latest investigation that blames CIA >>>>analysts for the false information that Iraq had weapons of mass >>>>destruction.>>>>
That's the reason Bush invaded Iraq, remember? Once again it's those >>>>low-level bureaucrats who took us into war. And once again a panel of >>>>"don't rock the boat" establishment figures has let the commander in >>>>chief off the hook.>>>>
Any other president would have blown his stack. Instead, Bush honored >>>>former CIA Director George Tenet with the Presidential Medal of Freedom.>>>
Why? If the investigation was well conducted, why would 'any other president>>>have blown his stack'? Would any other president have wanted a *crappy*>>>investigation?>>>
Being pleased with the performance of the investigators does not mean being>>>pleased with the providers of bad information. >>>
If Tenet had just been fired, you'd be complaining that Bush did it because>>>Tenet was a Clinton hire. \>>>
Get off it, Jimcomma. >>
Didja ever think he might have "blown his stack" with the results of the >>investigation which told him he had a bunch of incompetents working for >>him? Instead he was happy with the cover up.>>
Appears the article went over your head John>
Would you have felt better if Kerry had won? Or if Kerry had led the> investigation? >
Are you saying the investigation found fault in the wrong place? Do you know> *what* you're saying?
The commission found what they were supposed to find -- *anything* to clear bush of being a war mongering dumbass
WASHINGTON -- White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan says President >>>>>Bush was "pleased" with the latest investigation that blames CIA >>>>>analysts for the false information that Iraq had weapons of mass >>>>>destruction.>>>>>
That's the reason Bush invaded Iraq, remember? Once again it's those >>>>>low-level bureaucrats who took us into war. And once again a panel of >>>>>"don't rock the boat" establishment figures has let the commander in >>>>>chief off the hook.>>>>>
Any other president would have blown his stack. Instead, Bush honored >>>>>former CIA Director George Tenet with the Presidential Medal of Freedom.>>>>
Why? If the investigation was well conducted, why would 'any other president>>>>have blown his stack'? Would any other president have wanted a *crappy*>>>>investigation?>>>>
Being pleased with the performance of the investigators does not mean being>>>>pleased with the providers of bad information. >>>>
If Tenet had just been fired, you'd be complaining that Bush did it because>>>>Tenet was a Clinton hire. \>>>>
Get off it, Jimcomma. >>>
Didja ever think he might have "blown his stack" with the results of the >>>investigation which told him he had a bunch of incompetents working for >>>him? Instead he was happy with the cover up.>>>
Appears the article went over your head John>>
Would you have felt better if Kerry had won? Or if Kerry had led the>> investigation? >>
Are you saying the investigation found fault in the wrong place? Do you know>> *what* you're saying?>The commission found what they were supposed to find -- *anything* to >clear bush of being a war mongering dumbass
So the commission was working for Bush? Is that your contention? Would you have been happier if Bush had gotten on TV and lambasted everyone in the CIA, calling them the most worthless scum that ever existed? Would *that* have done the trick? -- John H
"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."
So the commission was working for Bush? Is that your contention?
Uh, John, the President appointed the members of the commission. The President set the *limited* mandate of the commission. The commission was a Presidential Commission, not a Congressional Commission.
Is it your contention that the President's decision was made exclusive of> CIA input?
No, it is my contention that President Bush led us to war. How do I know what he based that decision on? Clearly, there are no WMD. Perhaps, as Wolfowitz said, one of the reasons was to placate al Qaeda, by removing US troops from Saudi Arabia.
WASHINGTON -- White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan says President >>Bush was "pleased" with the latest investigation that blames CIA >>analysts for the false information that Iraq had weapons of mass >>destruction.>>
That's the reason Bush invaded Iraq, remember? Once again it's those >>low-level bureaucrats who took us into war. And once again a panel of >>"don't rock the boat" establishment figures has let the commander in >>chief off the hook.>>
Any other president would have blown his stack. Instead, Bush honored >>former CIA Director George Tenet with the Presidential Medal of Freedom.>
Why? If the investigation was well conducted, why would 'any other president>have blown his stack'? Would any other president have wanted a *crappy*>investigation?>
Being pleased with the performance of the investigators does not mean being>pleased with the providers of bad information. >
If Tenet had just been fired, you'd be complaining that Bush did it because>Tenet was a Clinton hire. \>
Get off it, Jimcomma. >-- >John H>
"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."
Bad decision to answer an off topic poster. Ignore him. He wants to keep rec.boats as wrecked.boats, the joke newsgroup of all real boaters.
WASHINGTON -- White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan says President >>>Bush was "pleased" with the latest investigation that blames CIA >>>analysts for the false information that Iraq had weapons of mass >>>destruction.>>>
That's the reason Bush invaded Iraq, remember? Once again it's those >>>low-level bureaucrats who took us into war. And once again a panel of >>>"don't rock the boat" establishment figures has let the commander in >>>chief off the hook.>>>
Any other president would have blown his stack. Instead, Bush honored >>>former CIA Director George Tenet with the Presidential Medal of Freedom.>>
Why? If the investigation was well conducted, why would 'any other president>> have blown his stack'? Would any other president have wanted a *crappy*>> investigation?>>
Being pleased with the performance of the investigators does not mean being>> pleased with the providers of bad information. >>
If Tenet had just been fired, you'd be complaining that Bush did it because>> Tenet was a Clinton hire. \>>
Get off it, Jimcomma. >
Didja ever think he might have "blown his stack" with the results of the >investigation which told him he had a bunch of incompetents working for >him? Instead he was happy with the cover up.>
Appears the article went over your head John
And it appears that off topic posting and destroying a newsgroup is way over your head.
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 17:38:14 -0400, thunder <thunderTAKEOUT@gti.net> wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 17:18:07 -0400, John H wrote:>
Is it your contention that the President's decision was made exclusive of>> CIA input?>
No, it is my contention that President Bush led us to war. How do I know>what he based that decision on? Clearly, there are no WMD. Perhaps, as>Wolfowitz said, one of the reasons was to placate al Qaeda, by removing US>troops from Saudi Arabia.>
Harry shits in his bed 12 April 2005 07:58:44 [ permanent link ]
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, "Harry.Krause" <harry.krause@gmail.com> wrote:>God Almighty already wrote:>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, John H <notavailable@here.com> wrote:>>
Snipped>>
What does it take to make you all realize that your petty little political>> wars have nothing to do with re.boats?>>
Join the revolution, no more wrecked boats.>>
These anonymous posts smell like...smithers or netslut.
Wrrog numbnutz. I hate OT posters and those that are especially rude, like you.
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, "Harry.Krause" <harry.krause@gmail.com> wrote:>God Almighty already wrote:>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, John H <notavailable@here.com> wrote:>>
Snipped>>
What does it take to make you all realize that your petty little political>> wars have nothing to do with re.boats?>>
Join the revolution, no more wrecked boats.>>
These anonymous posts smell like...smithers or netslut.
