On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:49:08 -0500, "Jim Carter" <theboat@rogers.com> wrote:
Can anyone remember the web site with the large waves that were breaking>over the large ships?>
I need to send this to a friend and I had deleted it from my list.>
Thanks>
Jim Carter>
I don't remember who posted it. But, I do remember that Karen Smith had several posts in that thread. You might retrieve all the headers, then sort by author, find Smith's posts, and search that way. -- John H
"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."
John H wrote:> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:49:08 -0500, "Jim Carter" <theboat@rogers.com> wrote:>
Can anyone remember the web site with the large waves that were breaking>>over the large ships?>>
I need to send this to a friend and I had deleted it from my list.>>
Thanks>>
Jim Carter>>
I don't remember who posted it. But, I do remember that Karen Smith had several> posts in that thread. You might retrieve all the headers, then sort by author,> find Smith's posts, and search that way.
Paul Schilter > wrote:> John,> That sounds like an all day job. > Paul>
John H wrote:>
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:49:08 -0500, "Jim Carter" <theboat@rogers.com> >> wrote:>>
Can anyone remember the web site with the large waves that were breaking>>> over the large ships?>>>
I need to send this to a friend and I had deleted it from my list.>>>
Thanks>>>
Jim Carter>>>
I don't remember who posted it. But, I do remember that Karen Smith >> had several>> posts in that thread. You might retrieve all the headers, then sort by >> author,>> find Smith's posts, and search that way.
Sounds like something you'd be forced to do in the Gulag.
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:49:08 -0500, "Jim Carter" <theboat@rogers.com> wrote:
Can anyone remember the web site with the large waves that were breaking>over the large ships?
That was me skippering the CG vessel. My crew insisted that it would not take waves that large, but I pleasently proved them wrong, and set a new standard fo CG operations.
HaKrause wrote:> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:49:08 -0500, "Jim Carter" <theboat@rogers.com>> wrote:>
Can anyone remember the web site with the large waves that were breaking>>over the large ships?>
That was me skippering the CG vessel. My crew insisted that it would> not take waves that large, but I pleasently proved them wrong, and set> a new standard fo CG operations.
Nope. This is the "Harry Identity Thief" again, posting from roadrunner in Columbus, Ohio.
-- Bush and the NeoConvicts who control him are destroying the once-great United States.
On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 14:01:49 -0500, Paul Schilter <""paulschilter\"@comcast dot net"> wrote:
John,>That sounds like an all day job. >Paul>
John H wrote:>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:49:08 -0500, "Jim Carter" <theboat@rogers.com> wrote:>>
Can anyone remember the web site with the large waves that were breaking>>>over the large ships?>>>
I need to send this to a friend and I had deleted it from my list.>>>
Thanks>>>
Jim Carter>>>
I don't remember who posted it. But, I do remember that Karen Smith had several>> posts in that thread. You might retrieve all the headers, then sort by author,>> find Smith's posts, and search that way.
I didn't say it would be fun!
-- John H
"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."
He's got you running. You must be tired of the retractions...
HaKrause wrote:> HaKrause wrote:>
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:49:08 -0500, "Jim Carter" <theboat@rogers.com>>> wrote:>>
Can anyone remember the web site with the large waves that were breaking>>> over the large ships?>>
That was me skippering the CG vessel. My crew insisted that it would>> not take waves that large, but I pleasently proved them wrong, and set>> a new standard fo CG operations.>
Nope. This is the "Harry Identity Thief" again, posting from roadrunner > in Columbus, Ohio.>
Dan Krueger wrote:> He's got you running. You must be tired of the retractions...>
HaKrause wrote:>
HaKrause wrote:>>
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:49:08 -0500, "Jim Carter" <theboat@rogers.com>>>> wrote:>>>
Can anyone remember the web site with the large waves that were >>>> breaking>>>> over the large ships?>>>
That was me skippering the CG vessel. My crew insisted that it would>>> not take waves that large, but I pleasently proved them wrong, and set>>> a new standard fo CG operations.>>
Nope. This is the "Harry Identity Thief" again, posting from >> roadrunner in Columbus, Ohio.>>
Not at all. I think the fool is doing great damage here, not to me, but to the newsgroup in general, by dispensing his idiocy. If you can't see why, then you are also the fool.
-- Bush and the NeoConvicts who control him are destroying the once-great United States.
K. Smith wrote:> chuckgould.chuck@gmail.com wrote:>
Is there a known antidote for the poison in your pen?>>
Ask your village witch doctor whether your obsession is a sign of>> robust mental health.>> You might do a bit of good by passing along the answer to others in>> your camp.>>
Every single thread these days turns into you, Tuuk, and the ubiquitous>> phony Harrys mounting a non-stop attack on folks- (usually Harry). You>> think he's worth all the time and energy? Your activities reflect more>> poorly on you than they do your victims. Anybody who seeks out>> opportunities to behave the way you and your crew have been doing has>> some very serious issues to deal with.>>
And a rejoinder from the failed used car salesman who then > progressed to a failed boat broker who now spams this NG with anything > that throws him a few bob.>
Ahhh, here's Tuuk's usenet mother, Karen Smith of Oz.
-- Bush and the NeoConvicts who control him are destroying the once-great United States.
Chuck, You seem to spend a lot of time telling everyone how sick and mentally ill Karen is.
<chuckgould.chuck@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1112410350.467921.111610@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...> Is there a known antidote for the poison in your pen?>
Ask your village witch doctor whether your obsession is a sign of> robust mental health.> You might do a bit of good by passing along the answer to others in> your camp.>
Every single thread these days turns into you, Tuuk, and the ubiquitous> phony Harrys mounting a non-stop attack on folks- (usually Harry). You> think he's worth all the time and energy? Your activities reflect more> poorly on you than they do your victims. Anybody who seeks out> opportunities to behave the way you and your crew have been doing has> some very serious issues to deal with.>
JohnH, Every few months, Chuck will scold Harry in a good natured manner, what Chuck refuses to understand is Harry set the tone of rec.boats years ago.
"John H" <notavailable@here.com> wrote in message news4nt4150g2v9ueare55erpfaip2t99jf8a@4ax.com...> On 2 Apr 2005 09:35:16 -0800, chuckgould.chuck@gmail.com wrote:>
"Exchanges between Harry and his obsessed nemesi", for example.>>Specifically includes Harry, wouldn't you agree?>
Let's see...>
You refer to Harry as 'Harry'.>
You refer to others as 'his obsessed nemesi' (sic).>
Does either of those sound a little more derogatory than the other?>
Are those who lambaste Harry any more obsessed than Harry is with those he> lambastes?>
You are not as unbiased as you give yourself credit for, Chuck.> -- > John H>
"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."
John H wrote:> On 2 Apr 2005 09:35:16 -0800, chuckgould.chuck@gmail.com wrote:>
"Exchanges between Harry and his obsessed nemesi", for example.>>Specifically includes Harry, wouldn't you agree?>
Let's see...>
You refer to Harry as 'Harry'.
You're really stuck on me, Herring. I guess if I ever see you following me into Deale, I should keep a close watch on my "six," because you obviously are after my butt.
"SoFarrell" <NoSpam@Yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1112471274.75842dadff01b0279aea4875d54dfa83@teranews...> It must be tough to be so ignored by your enemy no matter how hard you > try.
No it isn't. I really do not care if Harry responds to my post, he reads every one of them.
"Harry Krause" <harry.krause@gmail.com> wrote in message news:3b8ec8F6hn8poU1@individual.net...> Sherlock is one of the "Smith" IDs, and he is in my bozo bin and thus, > ignored. I filter out right-wing vermin and those who in my opinion have > nothing to add to the flavor of rec.boats.
Harry, here you go again, nipping at my heels, you must be obsessed with me.
John H, That's rather unfair of you. Any of us are subject to the criticism for what we post, but we shouldn't be held for what an impostor posts. Paul
He's got you running. You must be tired of the retractions...>>
HaKrause wrote:>>
HaKrause wrote:>>>
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:49:08 -0500, "Jim Carter" <theboat@rogers.com>>>>> wrote:>>>>
Can anyone remember the web site with the large waves that were >>>>> breaking>>>>> over the large ships?>>>>
That was me skippering the CG vessel. My crew insisted that it would>>>> not take waves that large, but I pleasently proved them wrong, and set>>>> a new standard fo CG operations.>>>
Nope. This is the "Harry Identity Thief" again, posting from >>> roadrunner in Columbus, Ohio.>>>
Not at all. I think the fool is doing great damage here, not to me, but > to the newsgroup in general, by dispensing his idiocy. If you can't see > why, then you are also the fool.>
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 19:20:58 -0500, Paul Schilter <""paulschilter\"@comcast dot net"> wrote:
John H,>That's rather unfair of you. Any of us are subject to the criticism for >what we post, but we shouldn't be held for what an impostor posts.>Paul>
John H wrote:>
There's only one, as far as I'm concerned.
I think you misunderstood me. Harry Krause is Harry Krause. The imposter is whoever. I have no trouble determining which is which when I see a response with their post in it.
I see very few of *either* of their posts. I have never, to my knowledge, criticized Harry for something the imposter posted. From what I've seen, which is not a whole lot, the imposter seems to be embellishing stories Harry has already told.
Harry (I'm sure you're looking over Paul's shoulder), if I have held you to account for something a Harry imposter said, I apologize.
You, Harry, deserve to be held account for *your* posts and *only* your posts. -- John H
"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."
"Garth Almgren" <nospam@v6stang.com> wrote in message>>
Just killfile the idiot and move on.>
Garth,> Are you talking about mini-me or the real Harry?
The fake one, of course. That should have been quite clear from what I wrote about the fake Harry's posts being asinine and easy to spot.
-- ~/Garth - 1966 Glastron V-142 Skiflite: "Blue-Boat" "There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in boats." -Kenneth Grahame, The Wind in the Willows
'"'''"Or she'll send her usenet son, Tuu,,,,,k, over to slit your throat. But we're ready for Tuuk:""""""
krause,, you fool,,, you cannot win a battle of intelligence with me,,, so you reach for your loaded shot gun in your front hall closet,,, lol,,, krause you liar...
krause,,, just because I keep catching you in your lies,,, doesn't mean you have to load up your shot gun and shoot me,,, lol,,,, I have 1000 bucks that says you shoot yourself in your own foot first,,, lol,,,ooooo my,,,guaranteed investment.
what do you say krause??? 1000 says you shoot yourself first.
"Harry Krause" <harry.krause@gmail.com> wrote in message news:3b6issF6hlfaiU1@individual.net...> Wayne.B wrote:>> On 1 Apr 2005 18:52:30 -0800, chuckgould.chuck@gmail.com wrote:>>
Anybody who seeks out>>>opportunities to behave the way you and your crew have been doing has>>>some very serious issues to deal with.>>
=====================================>>
Careful now.>>
Under woman will turn on you like a pit bull with a bad hair day,>> which is not to say that I don't agree.>
Or she'll send her usenet son, Tuu,,,,,k, over to slit your throat.> But we're ready for Tuuk:>
Dr. Dr. K.G. Sherlock 4 April 2005 17:57:04 [ permanent link ]
SoFarrell,
It is interesting to note how Tuuk has gotten your attention with some minor comments concerning Harry. I guess you can appreciate the Tuuk's frustration when he "baited" Tuuk with discussions of Tuuk screwing his sister and his sister and mother being prostitutes in Thailand. I for one would not allow any comments made in rec.boats to upset me, but some do.
"SoFarrell" <NoSpam@Yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1112614403.c522ce10253e249b9cf40693219bfe76@teranews...>
" Tuuk" <bangkokbob5001@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:mA24e.10656$If1.2784519@read2.cgocable.net...>> schilter,,>>
you said>>
''''''After a certain point it no longer matters who>> "started it".>> Paul'''''>>
you did schilter,,, you made a couple lies,, point blank lies,, and I >> caught you smoking guns.>>
Then you lied about your lie,,, hmmmmm>>
just apologize for it and lets get over it,,, then it no longer matters >> who started it,,>>
What you think? You man enough?????>
You are some piece of cake Mr Tuck. Get some help.>
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:57:04 -0400, "Dr. Dr. K.G. Sherlock" <Bullshitsherlock@gmail.com> wrote:
SoFarrell,>
It is interesting to note how Tuuk has gotten your attention with some minor >comments concerning Harry. I guess you can appreciate the Tuuk's >frustration when he "baited" Tuuk with discussions of Tuuk screwing his >sister and his sister and mother being prostitutes in Thailand. I for one >would not allow any comments made in rec.boats to upset me, but some do.>
"SoFarrell" <NoSpam@Yahoo.com> wrote in message >news:1112614403.c522ce10253e249b9cf40693219bfe76@teranews...>>
" Tuuk" <bangkokbob5001@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:mA24e.10656$If1.2784519@read2.cgocable.net...>>> schilter,,>>>
you said>>>
''''''After a certain point it no longer matters who>>> "started it".>>> Paul'''''>>>
you did schilter,,, you made a couple lies,, point blank lies,, and I >>> caught you smoking guns.>>>
Then you lied about your lie,,, hmmmmm>>>
just apologize for it and lets get over it,,, then it no longer matters >>> who started it,,>>>
What you think? You man enough?????>>
You are some piece of cake Mr Tuck. Get some help.>>
I've asked SoFarrel to go read a years worth of Harry's posts, but I think he's already developed his agenda. -- John H
"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."
"Dr. Dr. K.G. Sherlock" <Bullshitsherlock@gmail.com> wrote in message news:9OednSwlm-8v2szfRVn-3g@comcast.com...> SoFarrell,>
It is interesting to note how Tuuk has gotten your attention with some > minor comments concerning Harry. I guess you can appreciate the Tuuk's > frustration when he "baited" Tuuk with discussions of Tuuk screwing his > sister and his sister and mother being prostitutes in Thailand. I for one > would not allow any comments made in rec.boats to upset me, but some do.
Tuuk needs to get over it and move on. He comes across as a crazy out of control lunatic.
SoF, I don't disagree with you, but my point is Tuuk's posts have gotten you upset (without even directing his comments to you) so you have made numerous posts concerning his behavior, his mental health and his medication level.
Your posts to Tuuk, while less intense than Tuuk's, are very similar in natue.
"SoFarrell" <NoSpam@Yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1112638754.f2de2bb5f2c6afaabbc4909b7c97ae89@teranews...>
"Dr. Dr. K.G. Sherlock" <Bullshitsherlock@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:9OednSwlm-8v2szfRVn-3g@comcast.com...>> SoFarrell,>>
It is interesting to note how Tuuk has gotten your attention with some >> minor comments concerning Harry. I guess you can appreciate the Tuuk's >> frustration when he "baited" Tuuk with discussions of Tuuk screwing his >> sister and his sister and mother being prostitutes in Thailand. I for >> one would not allow any comments made in rec.boats to upset me, but some >> do.>
Tuuk needs to get over it and move on. He comes across as a crazy out of > control lunatic.>
what is with all these liars,, does it make you a bigger man??
gees,,
no more liars please,,, I haven't the time
"SoFarrell" <NoSpam@Yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1112638754.f2de2bb5f2c6afaabbc4909b7c97ae89@teranews...>
"Dr. Dr. K.G. Sherlock" <Bullshitsherlock@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:9OednSwlm-8v2szfRVn-3g@comcast.com...>> SoFarrell,>>
It is interesting to note how Tuuk has gotten your attention with some >> minor comments concerning Harry. I guess you can appreciate the Tuuk's >> frustration when he "baited" Tuuk with discussions of Tuuk screwing his >> sister and his sister and mother being prostitutes in Thailand. I for >> one would not allow any comments made in rec.boats to upset me, but some >> do.>
Tuuk needs to get over it and move on. He comes across as a crazy out of > control lunatic.>
