Michael Baldwin Bruce <mbbruce@mighty.co.za> wrote:
Bruce AKA tholen@antispam.ham wrote:> > "Raving Loonie" <raving.loonie@gmail.com> writes:> >
I stand my ground against USENET bullies like bisectional.> >
Not such a bad thing, IMO ...> >
I confess that I enjoy watching your game.> >
You're erroneously presupposing that I'm playing any game, Loonie.> >
Your wit seems to pass by> > >>> unnoticed by many. Too bad that your opponents are rather dull.> You> > >>> have become a bit of a pied piper.> >
Obviously they don't consider themselves to be rats, but it> wouldn't> > >> be the first time they'd be oblivious to something.> >
... I think of your list as sticky 'fly-paper' with all those> dead> > >>> flies stuck to it.> >
I find something interesting with the manner in which you hang out> > > fly-paper and use it to differentiate between pertinent and> incidental.> >
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?> >
It gets a bit confusing though. What 'sticks' seems to be what one> > > wishes to get rid of ?> >
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?> >
What you think is irrelevant. The facts are relevant, and one> fact is> > >> that it serves to substantiate a claim, while also contradicting> > >> someone else's claim.> >
People have a habit of using 'irrelevent' and 'Non Sequitor' whilst> > > bantering with you ...> >
They also have a habit of using "lsit", "poast", and other> misspellings,> > and then repeat the misspelling in the future to make it look like it> > was intentional.>
Were "Clasic", "lassic", "mispellings", "comprehenion", "readign",> "pontfication", etc. intentional, Bruce, or are you just a hypocrite?
He's just a hypocrite, Bruce.>
No one seems to allude to the likes of ...> > >
Chaque a son gout> > > ...or One man's meat is another man's poison> > >
What's the big deal about 'Non Sequitor' anyhow?> > > ... is it always necessary to force to conclusion?> > >
"Asking questions" and asserting convergence through answers are> > > distinctly different activities.> > >
We are often fooled into assuming that questions 'can' or 'need be'> > > answered.> > >
Example:> > > Does Clinton deserve to be president for his philandering with> Monica> > > Lewinski?> > >
One could ask a million questions of the form ...> > > "Does Clinton deserve to be president for ..."> > >
Why should any one specific question be singled out over another> ...> > > aside from the fact that the 'attention' is riveted on the focus of> the> > > questioner who is demanding an answer?> > >
If the the 'philandering' issue is the "make or break" descision> point> > > ....> > > the answer should have been NO, long ago. It is foolish to have a> > > president whose competency hangs upon the slender thread of a> single> > > consideration.> > >
'Non Sequitor'!> > >
... 'bully' for whoever ...> >
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?> >
I didn't realize how easy it was to razz, Art Deco. Be kind,> Tholen> >
....> >
The questrion is ... ... can Art Deco be so, too ?> >
Not much experience with USENET bullies, eh Loonie?> >
Nope. ... only some experience with the garden variety 'real life'> > > ones. Is there much difference?> >
The medium.>
The medium is the massage, Bruce?>
I think so, Bruce, afterall, Classic Tholenator(tm) is a psychic astrologer.
I stand my ground against USENET bullies like bisectional.> > > >
Not such a bad thing, IMO ...> > > >
I confess that I enjoy watching your game.> > > >
You're erroneously presupposing that I'm playing any game,> Loonie.> > > >
Your wit seems to pass by> > > > >>> unnoticed by many. Too bad that your opponents are rather> dull.> > > You> > > > >>> have become a bit of a pied piper.> > > >
Obviously they don't consider themselves to be rats, but it> > > wouldn't> > > > >> be the first time they'd be oblivious to something.> > > >
... I think of your list as sticky 'fly-paper' with all> those> > > dead> > > > >>> flies stuck to it.> > > >
I find something interesting with the manner in which you hang> out> > > > > fly-paper and use it to differentiate between pertinent and> > > incidental.> > > >
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?> > > >
It gets a bit confusing though. What 'sticks' seems to be what> one> > > > > wishes to get rid of ?> > > >
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?> > > >
What you think is irrelevant. The facts are relevant, and one> > > fact is> > > > >> that it serves to substantiate a claim, while also> contradicting> > > > >> someone else's claim.> > > >
People have a habit of using 'irrelevent' and 'Non Sequitor'> whilst> > > > > bantering with you ...> > > >
They also have a habit of using "lsit", "poast", and other> > > misspellings,> > > > and then repeat the misspelling in the future to make it look> like it> > > > was intentional.> > >
Were "Clasic", "lassic", "mispellings", "comprehenion", "readign",> > > "pontfication", etc. intentional, Bruce, or are you just a> hypocrite?> >
He's just a hypocrite, Bruce.>
I know, Bruce. It was a rhetorical question anway because I know the> hypocritical coward won't answer.
To be expected of Davie the Cowardly Whiner, Bruce.>
No one seems to allude to the likes of ...> > > > >
Chaque a son gout> > > > > ...or One man's meat is another man's poison> > > > >
What's the big deal about 'Non Sequitor' anyhow?> > > > > ... is it always necessary to force to conclusion?> > > > >
"Asking questions" and asserting convergence through answers> are> > > > > distinctly different activities.> > > > >
We are often fooled into assuming that questions 'can' or 'need> be'> > > > > answered.> > > > >
Example:> > > > > Does Clinton deserve to be president for his philandering with> > > Monica> > > > > Lewinski?> > > > >
One could ask a million questions of the form ...> > > > > "Does Clinton deserve to be president for ..."> > > > >
Why should any one specific question be singled out over> another> > > ...> > > > > aside from the fact that the 'attention' is riveted on the> focus of> > > the> > > > > questioner who is demanding an answer?> > > > >
If the the 'philandering' issue is the "make or break"> descision> > > point> > > > > ....> > > > > the answer should have been NO, long ago. It is foolish to have> a> > > > > president whose competency hangs upon the slender thread of a> > > single> > > > > consideration.> > > > >
'Non Sequitor'!> > > > >
... 'bully' for whoever ...> > > >
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?> > > >
I didn't realize how easy it was to razz, Art Deco. Be kind,> > > Tholen> > > >
....> > > >
The questrion is ... ... can Art Deco be so, too ?> > > >
Not much experience with USENET bullies, eh Loonie?> > > >
Nope. ... only some experience with the garden variety 'real> life'> > > > > ones. Is there much difference?> > > >
The medium.> > >
The medium is the massage, Bruce?> > >
I think so, Bruce, afterall, Classic Tholenator(tm) is a psychic> > astrologer.>
He certainly knows the position of Uranus, Bruce.
I have been told that Chuckweasel Bohnehead also knows, Bruce.
I stand my ground against USENET bullies like> bisectional.> > > > > >
Not such a bad thing, IMO ...> > > > > >
I confess that I enjoy watching your game.> > > > > >
You're erroneously presupposing that I'm playing any game,> > > Loonie.> > > > > >
Your wit seems to pass by> > > > > > >>> unnoticed by many. Too bad that your opponents are rather> > > dull.> > > > > You> > > > > > >>> have become a bit of a pied piper.> > > > > >
Obviously they don't consider themselves to be rats, but> it> > > > > wouldn't> > > > > > >> be the first time they'd be oblivious to something.> > > > > >
... I think of your list as sticky 'fly-paper' with all> > > those> > > > > dead> > > > > > >>> flies stuck to it.> > > > > >
I find something interesting with the manner in which you> hang> > > out> > > > > > > fly-paper and use it to differentiate between pertinent and> > > > > incidental.> > > > > >
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?> > > > > >
It gets a bit confusing though. What 'sticks' seems to be> what> > > one> > > > > > > wishes to get rid of ?> > > > > >
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?> > > > > >
What you think is irrelevant. The facts are relevant, and> one> > > > > fact is> > > > > > >> that it serves to substantiate a claim, while also> > > contradicting> > > > > > >> someone else's claim.> > > > > >
People have a habit of using 'irrelevent' and 'Non> Sequitor'> > > whilst> > > > > > > bantering with you ...> > > > > >
They also have a habit of using "lsit", "poast", and other> > > > > misspellings,> > > > > > and then repeat the misspelling in the future to make it look> > > like it> > > > > > was intentional.> > > > >
Were "Clasic", "lassic", "mispellings", "comprehenion",> "readign",> > > > > "pontfication", etc. intentional, Bruce, or are you just a> > > hypocrite?> > > >
He's just a hypocrite, Bruce.> > >
I know, Bruce. It was a rhetorical question anway because I know> the> > > hypocritical coward won't answer.> >
To be expected of Davie the Cowardly Whiner, Bruce.>
All I ever here is a funny clip-clop sound, Bruce.
Brave, brave Sir Tholen!>
No one seems to allude to the likes of ...> > > > > > >
Chaque a son gout> > > > > > > ...or One man's meat is another man's poison> > > > > > >
What's the big deal about 'Non Sequitor' anyhow?> > > > > > > ... is it always necessary to force to conclusion?> > > > > > >
We are often fooled into assuming that questions 'can' or> 'need> > > be'> > > > > > > answered.> > > > > > >
Example:> > > > > > > Does Clinton deserve to be president for his philandering> with> > > > > Monica> > > > > > > Lewinski?> > > > > > >
One could ask a million questions of the form ...> > > > > > > "Does Clinton deserve to be president for ..."> > > > > > >
Why should any one specific question be singled out over> > > another> > > > > ...> > > > > > > aside from the fact that the 'attention' is riveted on the> > > focus of> > > > > the> > > > > > > questioner who is demanding an answer?> > > > > > >
If the the 'philandering' issue is the "make or break"> > > descision> > > > > point> > > > > > > ....> > > > > > > the answer should have been NO, long ago. It is foolish to> have> > > a> > > > > > > president whose competency hangs upon the slender thread of> a> > > > > single> > > > > > > consideration.> > > > > > >
'Non Sequitor'!> > > > > > >
... 'bully' for whoever ...> > > > > >
What does that have to do with classical music, Loonie?> > > > > >
I didn't realize how easy it was to razz, Art Deco. Be> kind,> > > > > Tholen> > > > > >
....> > > > > >
The questrion is ... ... can Art Deco be so, too ?> > > > > >
Not much experience with USENET bullies, eh Loonie?> > > > > >
Nope. ... only some experience with the garden variety> 'real> > > life'> > > > > > > ones. Is there much difference?> > > > > >
The medium.> > > > >
The medium is the massage, Bruce?> > > > >
I think so, Bruce, afterall, Classic Tholenator(tm) is a psychic> > > > astrologer.> > >
He certainly knows the position of Uranus, Bruce.> >
I have been told that Chuckweasel Bohnehead also knows, Bruce.>
I'll bet Chuckles D. Bohnehead's crystal is oscillating right now,> Bruce.
Michael Baldwin Bruce <mbbruce@mighty.co.za> wrote:
Bruce the hypocrite AKA tholen@antispam.ham wrote:> > Nightingale writes:> >
Soldiers who appear in public dressed in uniform might hazard> certain> > >>>>> risks.> >
Such as?> >
I think his link to the photo was meant to illustrate one of them> - that> > >>> would only apply to one particular type of uniform though.> >
Nothing more hazardous than what has appeared on one of those> funny> > >> home videos programs.> >
I'll have to take your word for that, since I don't know those> programs.> >
You can easily imagine that they show lots of men losing their pants.>
You imagination is irrelevant, Bruce. Neither is your post with respect> to classical music. However, it is interesting to note that you are> into men losing their pants.
You can tell its the weekend, Bruce.>
Actually, it would seem to me that being a professional> musician in the> > >>>>> millitary would be an attractive career. Better pay and job> security> > >>>>> than certain major orchestras, perhaps? ... Great retirement> pension.> > >>>>> Doing what is enjoyed?> > >>>>>
Any thoughts or numbers on this one?> >
How often do they play serious band music?> >
Wouldn't it depend on which band? The US Marine Band does a lot.> >
They also stay in Washington DC a lot.> >
They do go on tour, but I think it's only for a couple of months> each year.> >
When was the last time a tour took them to Hawaii?>
Why would they want to go there?
The bus from Cleveland doesn't stop there, Bruce, this must be some kind of package tours of Hawaiian dive bars.
Never heard the acoustics there, so I am unable to comment. I> have> > >>>> been in the Sydney Opera House, however, though not to hear a> full> > >>>> orchestra.> >
What did you hear, and how are the acoustics?> >
Mostly spoken word, with some organ. Nothing jumped out in those> > >> situations regarding the acoustics.> >
Is it a nice organ?> >
I'm not a judge of organs.>
Not having one of your own, Bruce, that's not surprising.
He can tell you that an oboe "is what it is," Bruce.
Art Deco wrote:> > Michael Baldwin Bruce <mbbruce@mighty.co.za> wrote:> >
Bruce the hypocrite AKA tholen@antispam.ham wrote:> > > > Nightingale writes:> > > >
Soldiers who appear in public dressed in uniform might> hazard> > > certain> > > > >>>>> risks.> > > >
Such as?> > > >
I think his link to the photo was meant to illustrate one of> them> > > - that> > > > >>> would only apply to one particular type of uniform though.> > > >
Nothing more hazardous than what has appeared on one of those> > > funny> > > > >> home videos programs.> > > >
I'll have to take your word for that, since I don't know those> > > programs.> > > >
You can easily imagine that they show lots of men losing their> pants.> > >
You imagination is irrelevant, Bruce. Neither is your post with> respect> > > to classical music. However, it is interesting to note that you are> > > into men losing their pants.> >
You can tell its the weekend, Bruce.> > >
Actually, it would seem to me that being a professional> > > musician in the> > > > >>>>> millitary would be an attractive career. Better pay and job> > > security> > > > >>>>> than certain major orchestras, perhaps? ... Great> retirement> > > pension.> > > > >>>>> Doing what is enjoyed?> > > > >>>>>
Any thoughts or numbers on this one?> > > >
How often do they play serious band music?> > > >
Wouldn't it depend on which band? The US Marine Band does a> lot.> > > >
They also stay in Washington DC a lot.> > > >
They do go on tour, but I think it's only for a couple of> months> > > each year.> > > >
When was the last time a tour took them to Hawaii?> > >
Why would they want to go there?> >
The bus from Cleveland doesn't stop there, Bruce, this must be some> > kind of package tours of Hawaiian dive bars.>
Underwater?
Cleveland is the Mistake by the Lake, so perhaps it does now.> >
Never heard the acoustics there, so I am unable to comment.> I> > > have> > > > >>>> been in the Sydney Opera House, however, though not to hear> a> > > full> > > > >>>> orchestra.> > > >
What did you hear, and how are the acoustics?> > > >
Mostly spoken word, with some organ. Nothing jumped out in> those> > > > >> situations regarding the acoustics.> > > >
Is it a nice organ?> > > >
I'm not a judge of organs.> > >
Not having one of your own, Bruce, that's not surprising.> >
He can tell you that an oboe "is what it is," Bruce.> >
Michael Baldwin Bruce <mbbruce@mighty.co.za> wrote:
Bruce AKA Art Deco wrote:> > Michael Baldwin Bruce <mbbruce@mighty.co.za> wrote:> >
Bruce the hypocrite AKA tholen@antispam.ham wrote:> > > > Nightingale writes:> > > >
Soldiers who appear in public dressed in uniform might> hazard> > > certain> > > > >>>>> risks.> > > >
Such as?> > > >
I think his link to the photo was meant to illustrate one of> them> > > - that> > > > >>> would only apply to one particular type of uniform though.> > > >
Nothing more hazardous than what has appeared on one of those> > > funny> > > > >> home videos programs.> > > >
I'll have to take your word for that, since I don't know those> > > programs.> > > >
You can easily imagine that they show lots of men losing their> pants.> > >
You imagination is irrelevant, Bruce. Neither is your post with> respect> > > to classical music. However, it is interesting to note that you are> > > into men losing their pants.> >
You can tell its the weekend, Bruce.>
Not any more, Bruce. Not down under anyway.
Ah well, all good things have to come to an end, Bruce. Except Gigi's kookdance, of course. But the exception breaks down hard because Gigi's kookdance isn't a good thing, Bruce.>
Actually, it would seem to me that being a professional> > > musician in the> > > > >>>>> millitary would be an attractive career. Better pay and job> > > security> > > > >>>>> than certain major orchestras, perhaps? ... Great> retirement> > > pension.> > > > >>>>> Doing what is enjoyed?> > > > >>>>>
Any thoughts or numbers on this one?> > > >
How often do they play serious band music?> > > >
Wouldn't it depend on which band? The US Marine Band does a> lot.> > > >
They also stay in Washington DC a lot.> > > >
They do go on tour, but I think it's only for a couple of> months> > > each year.> > > >
When was the last time a tour took them to Hawaii?> > >
Why would they want to go there?> >
The bus from Cleveland doesn't stop there, Bruce, this must be some> > kind of package tours of Hawaiian dive bars.>
How do they land the bus at the airport, Bruce?
Special wharf?>
Never heard the acoustics there, so I am unable to comment.> I> > > have> > > > >>>> been in the Sydney Opera House, however, though not to hear> a> > > full> > > > >>>> orchestra.> > > >
What did you hear, and how are the acoustics?> > > >
Mostly spoken word, with some organ. Nothing jumped out in> those> > > > >> situations regarding the acoustics.> > > >
Is it a nice organ?> > > >
I'm not a judge of organs.> > >
Not having one of your own, Bruce, that's not surprising.> >
He can tell you that an oboe "is what it is," Bruce.>
Michael Baldwin Bruce <mbbruce@mighty.co.za> wrote:
Bruce the hypocrite AKA tholen@antispam.ham wrote:> > Nightingale writes:> >
Soldiers who appear in public dressed in uniform might hazard> certain> > >>>>>>> risks.> >
Such as?> >
I think his link to the photo was meant to illustrate one of> them - that> > >>>>> would only apply to one particular type of uniform though.> >
Nothing more hazardous than what has appeared on one of those> funny> > >>>> home videos programs.> >
I'll have to take your word for that, since I don't know those> programs.> >
You can easily imagine that they show lots of men losing their> pants.> >
That doesn't seem very funny to me. If that's the kind of thing> they> > > show, I will continue to miss them.> >
Among other things.>
What else do you lose, Bruce?
His sense of humor, Bruce.
And what does it have to do with> classical music?
Nada, Bruce, but Gigi will never admit it.>
Actually, it would seem to me that being a professional> musician in the> > >>>>>>> millitary would be an attractive career. Better pay and job> security> > >>>>>>> than certain major orchestras, perhaps? ... Great retirement> pension.> > >>>>>>> Doing what is enjoyed?> > >>>>>>>
Any thoughts or numbers on this one?> >
How often do they play serious band music?> >
Wouldn't it depend on which band? The US Marine Band does a> lot.> >
They also stay in Washington DC a lot.> >
They do go on tour, but I think it's only for a couple of months> each year.> >
When was the last time a tour took them to Hawaii?> >
I don't know - perhaps Don could answer that question for us.> >
Never heard the acoustics there, so I am unable to comment. I> have> > >>>>>> been in the Sydney Opera House, however, though not to hear a> full> > >>>>>> orchestra.> >
What did you hear, and how are the acoustics?> >
Mostly spoken word, with some organ. Nothing jumped out in> those> > >>>> situations regarding the acoustics.> >
Michael Baldwin Bruce <mbbruce@mighty.co.za> wrote:
Bruce AKA Art Deco wrote:> > Michael Baldwin Bruce <mbbruce@mighty.co.za> wrote:> >
Bruce AKA Art Deco wrote:> > > > Michael Baldwin Bruce <mbbruce@mighty.co.za> wrote:> > > >
Bruce the hypocrite AKA tholen@antispam.ham wrote:> > > > > > Nightingale writes:> > > > > >
Soldiers who appear in public dressed in uniform might> > > hazard> > > > > certain> > > > > > >>>>> risks.> > > > > >
Such as?> > > > > >
I think his link to the photo was meant to illustrate one> of> > > them> > > > > - that> > > > > > >>> would only apply to one particular type of uniform> though.> > > > > >
Nothing more hazardous than what has appeared on one of> those> > > > > funny> > > > > > >> home videos programs.> > > > > >
I'll have to take your word for that, since I don't know> those> > > > > programs.> > > > > >
You can easily imagine that they show lots of men losing> their> > > pants.> > > > >
You imagination is irrelevant, Bruce. Neither is your post with> > > respect> > > > > to classical music. However, it is interesting to note that you> are> > > > > into men losing their pants.> > > >
You can tell its the weekend, Bruce.> > >
Not any more, Bruce. Not down under anyway.> >
Ah well, all good things have to come to an end, Bruce.>
Don't worry, Bruce, there's always another one around the corner.>
Except Gigi's> > kookdance, of course. But the exception breaks down hard because> > Gigi's kookdance isn't a good thing, Bruce.>
True, Bruce, very true.>
Actually, it would seem to me that being a professional> > > > > musician in the> > > > > > >>>>> millitary would be an attractive career. Better pay and> job> > > > > security> > > > > > >>>>> than certain major orchestras, perhaps? ... Great> > > retirement> > > > > pension.> > > > > > >>>>> Doing what is enjoyed?> > > > > > >>>>>
Any thoughts or numbers on this one?> > > > > >
How often do they play serious band music?> > > > > >
Wouldn't it depend on which band? The US Marine Band> does a> > > lot.> > > > > >
They also stay in Washington DC a lot.> > > > > >
They do go on tour, but I think it's only for a couple of> > > months> > > > > each year.> > > > > >
When was the last time a tour took them to Hawaii?> > > > >
Why would they want to go there?> > > >
The bus from Cleveland doesn't stop there, Bruce, this must be> some> > > > kind of package tours of Hawaiian dive bars.> > >
How do they land the bus at the airport, Bruce?> >
Special wharf?>
The kind that only kooks know about, Bruce?
I certainly don't know anything about them, Bruce.>
Never heard the acoustics there, so I am unable to> comment.> > > I> > > > > have> > > > > > >>>> been in the Sydney Opera House, however, though not to> hear> > > a> > > > > full> > > > > > >>>> orchestra.> > > > > >
What did you hear, and how are the acoustics?> > > > > >
Mostly spoken word, with some organ. Nothing jumped out> in> > > those> > > > > > >> situations regarding the acoustics.> > > > > >
Is it a nice organ?> > > > > >
I'm not a judge of organs.> > > > >
Not having one of your own, Bruce, that's not surprising.> > > >
He can tell you that an oboe "is what it is," Bruce.> > >
But he can't judge organs, Bruce.> >
Oh yeah, I almost forgot, thanks Bruce.>
No worries, Bruce.
The only time I start to worry is when he clicks his high heels, Bruce.
Michael Baldwin Bruce <mbbruce@mighty.co.za> wrote:
Bruce AKA Art Deco wrote:> > Michael Baldwin Bruce <mbbruce@mighty.co.za> wrote:> >
Bruce the hypocrite AKA tholen@antispam.ham wrote:> > > > Nightingale writes:> > > >
Soldiers who appear in public dressed in uniform might> hazard> > > certain> > > > >>>>>>> risks.> > > >
Such as?> > > >
I think his link to the photo was meant to illustrate one> of> > > them - that> > > > >>>>> would only apply to one particular type of uniform though.> > > >
Nothing more hazardous than what has appeared on one of> those> > > funny> > > > >>>> home videos programs.> > > >
I'll have to take your word for that, since I don't know> those> > > programs.> > > >
You can easily imagine that they show lots of men losing their> > > pants.> > > >
That doesn't seem very funny to me. If that's the kind of> thing> > > they> > > > > show, I will continue to miss them.> > > >
Among other things.> > >
What else do you lose, Bruce?> >
His sense of humor, Bruce.>
I don't think he ever had one, Bruce.
It certainly nevers shows on usenet, Bruce. He makes St. Foamy seem like Steve Martin.>
And what does it have to do with> > > classical music?> >
Nada, Bruce, but Gigi will never admit it.>
He much prefers kookdancing to answering questions, Bruce.
Indeed he does, Bruce. Gigi is the master of answering questions with his own peculiar brand of non sequitur questions.>
Actually, it would seem to me that being a professional> > > musician in the> > > > >>>>>>> millitary would be an attractive career. Better pay and> job> > > security> > > > >>>>>>> than certain major orchestras, perhaps? ... Great> retirement> > > pension.> > > > >>>>>>> Doing what is enjoyed?> > > > >>>>>>>
Any thoughts or numbers on this one?> > > >
How often do they play serious band music?> > > >
Wouldn't it depend on which band? The US Marine Band does> a> > > lot.> > > >
They also stay in Washington DC a lot.> > > >
They do go on tour, but I think it's only for a couple of> months> > > each year.> > > >
When was the last time a tour took them to Hawaii?> > > >
I don't know - perhaps Don could answer that question for us.> > > >
Never heard the acoustics there, so I am unable to> comment. I> > > have> > > > >>>>>> been in the Sydney Opera House, however, though not to> hear a> > > full> > > > >>>>>> orchestra.> > > >
What did you hear, and how are the acoustics?> > > >
Mostly spoken word, with some organ. Nothing jumped out in> > > those> > > > >>>> situations regarding the acoustics.> > > >
Is it a nice organ?> > > >
I'm not a judge of organs.> > >
We know, Bruce.> >
Indeed, all usenet is now aware.>
Almost all, Bruce. There's always one newsgroup that hasn't heard yet.> Usenet is like that.
You are right, the .de froups probably have never be tholenized.
