Did you notice the bull crap make up call on the other end just after play started. Just when I think refs can not get any worse they just keep surprising me. Brad "Drew" <yeah@right.not> wrote in message news:d22csb$8n3@netnews.proxy.lucent.com...> The shot was taken off the board, and rightly so, but that was just too damned funny.>
Question - Does Anderson still get credit for the steal? Or do they just
pretend> the whole busted play did not happen?>
The last time Anderson was involved with a shot that was too late, it
counted,> and was the difference in the game.>
First half thoughts from a biased Spartan fan:>
1) Sparty gotta hit that layup!>
2) Nice jump, Daniel Ewing. Gotta give credit where it is due.>
3) Nice job on defense on both sides.>
4) I'm surprised at the number of offensive rebounds we've had.>
5) I'm not surprised at the number of missed shots that led to> those offensive rebounding opportunities. >
6) Redick is *so* going to explode on us in the second half.>
7) We've never led. This, too, comes as no surprise.>
8) But we're still in it (though that could change)>
9) If this game continues at this pace, it's got to be to> Sparty's advantage.>
10) I need more beer.>
That is all. I hope the second half is as good, and that> Duke doesn't just get medieval on our asses.>
The shot was taken off the board, and rightly so, but that was just>too damned funny.
*Was* it the right call? That is, what kinds of corrections does the rulebook allow for in those circumstances? (I haven't felt like checking myself .
And if it was the right call, how come they couldn't do the same thing at the end of the Indiana-Charlotte game? (Although from something I recall hearing, the problem there may have actually been a different one.)
Question - Does Anderson still get credit for the steal? Or do they>just pretend the whole busted play did not happen?>
The last time Anderson was involved with a shot that was too late, it>counted, and was the difference in the game.
[ ... ]
Why do I feel this reference was meant just for me?
"Milt Epstein" <mepstein@uiuc.edu> wrote in message news:d24r7g$khh$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu...> "Drew" <yeah@right.not> writes:>
The shot was taken off the board, and rightly so, but that was just> >too damned funny.>
*Was* it the right call? That is, what kinds of corrections does the> rulebook allow for in those circumstances? (I haven't felt like> checking myself .>
And if it was the right call, how come they couldn't do the same thing> at the end of the Indiana-Charlotte game? (Although from something I> recall hearing, the problem there may have actually been a different> one.)
The difference may have had to do with the coach that was in their ears...
The last time Anderson was involved with a shot that was too late, it> >counted, and was the difference in the game.> [ ... ]>
Why do I feel this reference was meant just for me?
Because you are paranoid. No, this reference was just because the same player was involved.
"Milt Epstein" <mepstein@uiuc.edu> wrote in message news:d24r7g$khh$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu...>> "Drew" <yeah@right.not> writes:>>
The shot was taken off the board, and rightly so, but that was just>> >too damned funny.>>
*Was* it the right call? That is, what kinds of corrections does the>> rulebook allow for in those circumstances? (I haven't felt like>> checking myself .>>
And if it was the right call, how come they couldn't do the same thing>> at the end of the Indiana-Charlotte game? (Although from something I>> recall hearing, the problem there may have actually been a different>> one.)>
The difference may have had to do with the coach that was in their>ears... >
The last time Anderson was involved with a shot that was too late, it>> >counted, and was the difference in the game.>> [ ... ]>>
Why do I feel this reference was meant just for me?>
Because you are paranoid. No, this reference was just because>the same player was involved.
Hey, just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean they *aren't* out to get me.
Cartoon seen at a computer security company: Face of a man, rubbing his chin, saying, "Sure, I'm paranoid. But am I paranoid *enough*?".
