I didn't catch this while it was happening, but thanks to Adam W for emailing me and bringing it to my attention. I know I said chemistry was better this year, but made zero mention of Steve Nash in my comments regarding chemistry.
I will just go with Adam's Email to say it all
During yesterday's game vs. Houston (no commment) Jim Gray said something very interesting. the summary of it was something to the affect of
JG: Dirk, I asked Mark [Cuban] and Finley if team chemistry was better without Nash, would you agree:
DN: No I don't think so (with a puzzled look on his face)
Now if I recall when Jim Gray talked to both you and Fin there was no mention of Nash in his chemistry statement. He just asked if team chemistry was better.
I thought Jim Gray was a solid reporter (if thats what you call him) but this was ridiculous."
Obviously I trust Adam to report accurately more than I trust Jim Gray.
What Gray did is pretty much the definition of slime reporting. I will talk to Dirk about it, but for a reporter or whatever he calls himself to misrepresent an interviewee's comments in order to elicit an emotional or controversial response is wrong.
ABC Sports should take immediate action against Jim Gray and suspend him from working until he apologizes to Dirk and Mavs fans.
I didn't catch this while it was happening, but thanks to Adam W for> emailing me and bringing it to my attention. I know I said chemistry was> better this year, but made zero mention of Steve Nash in my comments> regarding chemistry.>
I will just go with Adam's Email to say it all>
During yesterday's game vs. Houston (no commment) Jim Gray said something> very interesting. the summary of it was something to the affect of>
JG: Dirk, I asked Mark [Cuban] and Finley if team chemistry was better> without Nash, would you agree:>
DN: No I don't think so (with a puzzled look on his face)>
Now if I recall when Jim Gray talked to both you and Fin there was no> mention of Nash in his chemistry statement. He just asked if team chemistry> was better.>
I thought Jim Gray was a solid reporter (if thats what you call him) but> this was ridiculous.">
Obviously I trust Adam to report accurately more than I trust Jim Gray.>
What Gray did is pretty much the definition of slime reporting. I will talk> to Dirk about it, but for a reporter or whatever he calls himself to> misrepresent an interviewee's comments in order to elicit an emotional or> controversial response is wrong.>
ABC Sports should take immediate action against Jim Gray and suspend him> from working until he apologizes to Dirk and Mavs fans.>
Jim Gray sees himself as the great investigator when all he really is is a great instigator.
ABC should suspend Jim Gray until he apologizes> >
I didn't catch this while it was happening, but thanks to Adam W for> > emailing me and bringing it to my attention. I know I said chemistry was> > better this year, but made zero mention of Steve Nash in my comments> > regarding chemistry.> >
I will just go with Adam's Email to say it all> >
During yesterday's game vs. Houston (no commment) Jim Gray said
something> > very interesting. the summary of it was something to the affect of> >
JG: Dirk, I asked Mark [Cuban] and Finley if team chemistry was better> > without Nash, would you agree:> >
DN: No I don't think so (with a puzzled look on his face)> >
Now if I recall when Jim Gray talked to both you and Fin there was no> > mention of Nash in his chemistry statement. He just asked if team
chemistry> > was better.> >
I thought Jim Gray was a solid reporter (if thats what you call him)
this was ridiculous."> >
Obviously I trust Adam to report accurately more than I trust Jim Gray.> >
What Gray did is pretty much the definition of slime reporting. I will
talk> > to Dirk about it, but for a reporter or whatever he calls himself to> > misrepresent an interviewee's comments in order to elicit an emotional
controversial response is wrong.> >
ABC Sports should take immediate action against Jim Gray and suspend him> > from working until he apologizes to Dirk and Mavs fans.> >
Jim Gray sees himself as the great investigator when all he> really is is a great instigator.
I didn't catch this while it was happening, but thanks to Adam W for> emailing me and bringing it to my attention.
I am not a fan of Gray. But who the hell is Adam W?
I know I said chemistry was> better this year, but made zero mention of Steve Nash in my comments> regarding chemistry.>
I will just go with Adam's Email to say it all>
During yesterday's game vs. Houston (no commment) Jim Gray said something> very interesting. the summary of it was something to the affect of>
JG: Dirk, I asked Mark [Cuban] and Finley if team chemistry was better> without Nash, would you agree:>
DN: No I don't think so (with a puzzled look on his face)>
Now if I recall when Jim Gray talked to both you and Fin there was no> mention of Nash in his chemistry statement. He just asked if team
chemistry> was better.>
I thought Jim Gray was a solid reporter (if thats what you call him) but> this was ridiculous.">
Obviously I trust Adam to report accurately more than I trust Jim Gray.>
What Gray did is pretty much the definition of slime reporting. I will
talk> to Dirk about it, but for a reporter or whatever he calls himself to> misrepresent an interviewee's comments in order to elicit an emotional or> controversial response is wrong.>
ABC Sports should take immediate action against Jim Gray and suspend him> from working until he apologizes to Dirk and Mavs fans.>
ABC should suspend Jim Gray until he apologizes>>>
I didn't catch this while it was happening, but thanks to Adam W for>>>emailing me and bringing it to my attention. I know I said chemistry was>>>better this year, but made zero mention of Steve Nash in my comments>>>regarding chemistry.>>>
I will just go with Adam's Email to say it all>>>
During yesterday's game vs. Houston (no commment) Jim Gray said>
something>
very interesting. the summary of it was something to the affect of>>>
JG: Dirk, I asked Mark [Cuban] and Finley if team chemistry was better>>>without Nash, would you agree:>>>
DN: No I don't think so (with a puzzled look on his face)>>>
Now if I recall when Jim Gray talked to both you and Fin there was no>>>mention of Nash in his chemistry statement. He just asked if team>
chemistry>
was better.>>>
I thought Jim Gray was a solid reporter (if thats what you call him)>
this was ridiculous.">>>
Obviously I trust Adam to report accurately more than I trust Jim Gray.>>>
What Gray did is pretty much the definition of slime reporting. I will>
talk>
to Dirk about it, but for a reporter or whatever he calls himself to>>>misrepresent an interviewee's comments in order to elicit an emotional>
controversial response is wrong.>>>
ABC Sports should take immediate action against Jim Gray and suspend him>>>from working until he apologizes to Dirk and Mavs fans.>>>
Jim Gray sees himself as the great investigator when all he>>really is is a great instigator.>
Pete Rose incident ring a bell?
There was only one time I was ever actually happy that Jim Gray was on an assignment, and that was outside of Mike Tyson's dressing room, interviewing Tyson's bitches Rory Holloway and John Horne after he bit Evander Holyfield's ear.
I didn't catch this while it was happening, but thanks to Adam W for>> emailing me and bringing it to my attention. I know I said chemistry>> was better this year, but made zero mention of Steve Nash in my>> comments regarding chemistry.>>
I will just go with Adam's Email to say it all>>
During yesterday's game vs. Houston (no commment) Jim Gray said>> something very interesting. the summary of it was something to the>> affect of JG: Dirk, I asked Mark [Cuban] and Finley if team chemistry >> was>> better without Nash, would you agree:>>
DN: No I don't think so (with a puzzled look on his face)>>
Now if I recall when Jim Gray talked to both you and Fin there was>> no mention of Nash in his chemistry statement. He just asked if>> team chemistry was better.>>
I thought Jim Gray was a solid reporter (if thats what you call>> him) but this was ridiculous.">>
Obviously I trust Adam to report accurately more than I trust Jim>> Gray. What Gray did is pretty much the definition of slime reporting. I>> will talk to Dirk about it, but for a reporter or whatever he calls>> himself to misrepresent an interviewee's comments in order to elicit>> an emotional or controversial response is wrong.>>
ABC Sports should take immediate action against Jim Gray and suspend>> him from working until he apologizes to Dirk and Mavs fans.>>
Jim Gray sees himself as the great investigator when all he> really is is a great instigator.
Yeah, but when it gets Cuban's hackles up it can't be all bad, can it?
I didn't catch this while it was happening, but thanks to Adam W for> emailing me and bringing it to my attention. I know I said chemistry was> better this year, but made zero mention of Steve Nash in my comments> regarding chemistry.>
I will just go with Adam's Email to say it all>
During yesterday's game vs. Houston (no commment) Jim Gray said something> very interesting. the summary of it was something to the affect of>
JG: Dirk, I asked Mark [Cuban] and Finley if team chemistry was better> without Nash, would you agree:>
DN: No I don't think so (with a puzzled look on his face)>
Now if I recall when Jim Gray talked to both you and Fin there was no> mention of Nash in his chemistry statement. He just asked if team > chemistry> was better.>
I thought Jim Gray was a solid reporter (if thats what you call him) but> this was ridiculous.">
Obviously I trust Adam to report accurately more than I trust Jim Gray.>
What Gray did is pretty much the definition of slime reporting. I will > talk> to Dirk about it, but for a reporter or whatever he calls himself to> misrepresent an interviewee's comments in order to elicit an emotional or> controversial response is wrong.
Cuban is upset that someone is trying to "elicit an emotional or controversial response". Can you believe the nerve of some people, huh Mark?
ABC Sports should take immediate action against Jim Gray and suspend him> from working until he apologizes to Dirk and Mavs fans.>
Not cool if I was Dirk I would never speak to him again. Cuban should ban him from the stadium. "s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:d0n48b$hjs@dispatch.concentric.net...> http://www.blogmaverick.com/entry/1234000340034879/>
ABC should suspend Jim Gray until he apologizes>
I didn't catch this while it was happening, but thanks to Adam W for> emailing me and bringing it to my attention. I know I said chemistry was> better this year, but made zero mention of Steve Nash in my comments> regarding chemistry.>
I will just go with Adam's Email to say it all>
During yesterday's game vs. Houston (no commment) Jim Gray said something> very interesting. the summary of it was something to the affect of>
JG: Dirk, I asked Mark [Cuban] and Finley if team chemistry was better> without Nash, would you agree:>
DN: No I don't think so (with a puzzled look on his face)>
Now if I recall when Jim Gray talked to both you and Fin there was no> mention of Nash in his chemistry statement. He just asked if team > chemistry> was better.>
I thought Jim Gray was a solid reporter (if thats what you call him) but> this was ridiculous.">
Obviously I trust Adam to report accurately more than I trust Jim Gray.>
What Gray did is pretty much the definition of slime reporting. I will > talk> to Dirk about it, but for a reporter or whatever he calls himself to> misrepresent an interviewee's comments in order to elicit an emotional or> controversial response is wrong.>
ABC Sports should take immediate action against Jim Gray and suspend him> from working until he apologizes to Dirk and Mavs fans.>
"aluckyguess" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:SlMXd.6927$m02.2131@fe03.lga...> Not cool if I was Dirk I would never speak to him again. Cuban should ban> him from the stadium.> "s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message> news:d0n48b$hjs@dispatch.concentric.net...> > http://www.blogmaverick.com/entry/1234000340034879/> >
ABC should suspend Jim Gray until he apologizes> >
I didn't catch this while it was happening, but thanks to Adam W for> > emailing me and bringing it to my attention. I know I said chemistry was> > better this year, but made zero mention of Steve Nash in my comments> > regarding chemistry.> >
"Chemistry is better this year." So...what's the difference between this year and last. Ah ha...Steve Nash is no longer here. Ergo, without Steve Nash, chemistry is better.
You don't have to actually say it.
I will just go with Adam's Email to say it all> >
During yesterday's game vs. Houston (no commment) Jim Gray said
something> > very interesting. the summary of it was something to the affect of> >
JG: Dirk, I asked Mark [Cuban] and Finley if team chemistry was better> > without Nash, would you agree:> >
DN: No I don't think so (with a puzzled look on his face)> >
Now if I recall when Jim Gray talked to both you and Fin there was no> > mention of Nash in his chemistry statement. He just asked if team> > chemistry> > was better.> >
I thought Jim Gray was a solid reporter (if thats what you call him) but> > this was ridiculous."> >
Obviously I trust Adam to report accurately more than I trust Jim Gray.> >
What Gray did is pretty much the definition of slime reporting. I will> > talk> > to Dirk about it, but for a reporter or whatever he calls himself to> > misrepresent an interviewee's comments in order to elicit an emotional
controversial response is wrong.> >
ABC Sports should take immediate action against Jim Gray and suspend him> > from working until he apologizes to Dirk and Mavs fans.> >
The chemistry is better because we sent A Walker to Atlanta DUH !!!!
"PeterL" <peterl@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:399ihpF5vii22U1@individual.net...>
"aluckyguess" <no@no.com> wrote in message> news:SlMXd.6927$m02.2131@fe03.lga...>> Not cool if I was Dirk I would never speak to him again. Cuban should ban>> him from the stadium.>> "s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message>> news:d0n48b$hjs@dispatch.concentric.net...>> > http://www.blogmaverick.com/entry/1234000340034879/>> >
ABC should suspend Jim Gray until he apologizes>> >
I didn't catch this while it was happening, but thanks to Adam W for>> > emailing me and bringing it to my attention. I know I said chemistry >> > was>> > better this year, but made zero mention of Steve Nash in my comments>> > regarding chemistry.>> >
"Chemistry is better this year." So...what's the difference between this> year and last. Ah ha...Steve Nash is no longer here. Ergo, without Steve> Nash, chemistry is better.>
You don't have to actually say it.>
I will just go with Adam's Email to say it all>> >
During yesterday's game vs. Houston (no commment) Jim Gray said> something>> > very interesting. the summary of it was something to the affect of>> >
JG: Dirk, I asked Mark [Cuban] and Finley if team chemistry was better>> > without Nash, would you agree:>> >
DN: No I don't think so (with a puzzled look on his face)>> >
Now if I recall when Jim Gray talked to both you and Fin there was no>> > mention of Nash in his chemistry statement. He just asked if team>> > chemistry>> > was better.>> >
I thought Jim Gray was a solid reporter (if thats what you call him) >> > but>> > this was ridiculous.">> >
Obviously I trust Adam to report accurately more than I trust Jim Gray.>> >
What Gray did is pretty much the definition of slime reporting. I will>> > talk>> > to Dirk about it, but for a reporter or whatever he calls himself to>> > misrepresent an interviewee's comments in order to elicit an emotional> or>> > controversial response is wrong.>> >
ABC Sports should take immediate action against Jim Gray and suspend >> > him>> > from working until he apologizes to Dirk and Mavs fans.>> >
Love him or hate him Mark Cuban is good for his team and the NBA... Especially for Dallas Mavericks fans. Years of dealing with Perot and Carter.. and he brings an excitement to basketball we havent seen since Ro, Harper, and 87-88-89 teams ...Plus he is entertaining... You gotta love a man who is willing to speak out, take the fine and double it for another charity...
Jim Gray was getting his story and got one. He plays off of controversey and he does it well. All Mark Cuban has to do is blog it and it turns up in three or four national columns... They both got their cake...
I didn't catch this while it was happening, but thanks to Adam W for> emailing me and bringing it to my attention. I know I said chemistry was> better this year, but made zero mention of Steve Nash in my comments> regarding chemistry.>
I will just go with Adam's Email to say it all>
During yesterday's game vs. Houston (no commment) Jim Gray said something> very interesting. the summary of it was something to the affect of>
JG: Dirk, I asked Mark [Cuban] and Finley if team chemistry was better> without Nash, would you agree:>
DN: No I don't think so (with a puzzled look on his face)>
Now if I recall when Jim Gray talked to both you and Fin there was no> mention of Nash in his chemistry statement. He just asked if team > chemistry> was better.>
I thought Jim Gray was a solid reporter (if thats what you call him) but> this was ridiculous.">
Obviously I trust Adam to report accurately more than I trust Jim Gray.>
What Gray did is pretty much the definition of slime reporting. I will > talk> to Dirk about it, but for a reporter or whatever he calls himself to> misrepresent an interviewee's comments in order to elicit an emotional or> controversial response is wrong.>
ABC Sports should take immediate action against Jim Gray and suspend him> from working until he apologizes to Dirk and Mavs fans.>
