"it's sam, bitches" <sam5212342@aol.com> wrote in <news:1110151794.379699.326510@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>:
I ain't upset about this loss one bit.
It make me happy that Duke fans don't mind losses any more, killer instinct a thing of the past. Harry won't mind either, since he thought he was supposed to be a loser.
UNC fucking sucks in half court.
You'd think Duke could sweep a team that fucking sucks in half court.
it's sam, bitches wrote:> We have a fucking GREAT team, no matter what people say.>
I predicted 6 losses and we WILL lose in the ACC tournament.>
We're winning that NCAA title this year.>
I ain't upset about this loss one bit. UNC fucking sucks in half
court.
Nice to see you are taking it so well. Still calling the Title shot huh? we'll see. Wonder how the half court would have been with McCants playing and being healthy? (no, he wasn't healthy in Durham).
Geoffrey F. Green 7 March 2005 04:03:35 [ permanent link ]
In article <1110152098.361837.17470@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>, kstarheel@cox.net wrote:
it's sam, bitches wrote:> > We have a fucking GREAT team, no matter what people say.> >
I predicted 6 losses and we WILL lose in the ACC tournament.> >
We're winning that NCAA title this year.> >
I ain't upset about this loss one bit. UNC fucking sucks in half> court.>
Nice to see you are taking it so well. Still calling the Title shot> huh? we'll see. Wonder how the half court would have been with> McCants playing and being healthy? (no, he wasn't healthy in Durham).
Well, it's getting to the point where wondering how UNC would have done with McCants is akin to wondering how Duke would have done with Deng.
In article <MrQ9611B6AB2D559itsmeitsQ@QsFQDN.dyndns.org>, »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> wrote:> It make me happy that Duke fans don't mind losses any more, killer> instinct a thing of the past. Harry won't mind either, since he> thought he was supposed to be a loser.
You have to be proud of that game for either school. Just like Pickett's charge was the high water mark for the confederacy at Gettysburg - Carolina just enjoyed theirs. Good luck in the ACC tourney and NCAA tourney - now every loss counts Matt Doherty build one very excellent team. I hope Roy can steer them to the national championship if Duke does not make it. They could still meet twice before it is all over. Harry Nice game.
In article <Xns9611CD82F25ABKubez@66.26.32.9>, Kubez <president@whitehouse.gov> wrote:> And UNC won't go 1-11 from 3 again. With McCants or without.
Are the rest of the games on neutral courts? Roy will intentionally lose early in the ACC to get rested up for the NCAA. After all - he just won the coveted "regular season banner." Only kidding - welcome back Carolina - we missed you Harry
Harry Everhart <harry@everhart.com> wrote in news:harry- 0E9D59.20195906032005@comcast.dca.giganews.com:
In article <Xns9611CD82F25ABKubez@66.26.32.9>,> Kubez <president@whitehouse.gov> wrote:>> And UNC won't go 1-11 from 3 again. With McCants or without.>
Are the rest of the games on neutral courts?
Two previous games away from Chapel Hill were Maryland (9-22 from 3) and State (10-21), both without McCants.
"it's sam, bitches" <sam5212342@aol.com> wrote in news:1110155852.073757.247880@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
UNC fucking blows in half-court, man.
I don't know, "chuck it up there so Sean can get one of his TWELVE ORB's and convert the 3-point-play while fouling out a Dook stiff" worked pretty well today, dinnit?
Basically the same way they've awarded football National Titles> forever. There's not a tourney in football so what makes the 1926 UNC> team's undefeated season less deserving?
Good question. Remind us to answer it in 2018 when the 2005 football champion is finally named....
On Tue, 08 Mar, Charlie Board wrote:> kstarheel@cox.net wrote:>
Basically the same way they've awarded football National Titles>> forever. There's not a tourney in football so what makes the 1926 UNC>> team's undefeated season less deserving? >
Good question. Remind us to answer it in 2018 when the 2005> football champion is finally named....
Hey, they didn't have the Internet back then, so they had to use snail mail. You remember what it was like back then, don't you?
Donnie Barnes wrote:> On Tue, 08 Mar, Charlie Board wrote:>
kstarheel@cox.net wrote:>>
Basically the same way they've awarded football National Titles>>>forever. There's not a tourney in football so what makes the 1926 UNC>>>team's undefeated season less deserving? >>
Good question. Remind us to answer it in 2018 when the 2005>>football champion is finally named....>
Hey, they didn't have the Internet back then, so they had to use snail> mail. You remember what it was like back then, don't you? >
