How can I spare bandwidth while using the site?
Bonds or Clemens?
Hello Guest
  
  • Login
• Register…
• Start blog
  • Who, Where, When
• What can I do?
• What to Read?
  • Polls
• Avatars
• Interests
  • Cities and Countries
• Random blog
• Users search
  • Search
• Games
• Tests
• GYXU
  • Сообщества
• Talxy Chat
• Horoscope
• Online
 
Зарегистрируйся!

GYXU > Baseball > Bonds or Clemens? 29 May 2005 09:16:36

  Recent blog posts: 
  They have birthday today: 
  Forums:   
  Discuss: 
  Recent forum topics: 
  Recent forum comments:
  Moderators:

Bonds or Clemens?

Captain 20 29 May 2005 09:16:36
 Who's the best ballplayer of the past 20 years?


Add comment
Dave Melvin 24 May 2005 04:37:02 permanent link ]
 "Captain 20" <c20@setyrtfj.77com­> wrote in message
news:cluke.3319$%Z2­.1560@lakeread08...>­ Who's the best ballplayer of the past 20 years?>

Cal Riepken

dam


Add comment
Trent Woodruff 24 May 2005 05:57:59 permanent link ]
 
Captain 20 was cut from the Baylor football team for saying...
Who's the best ballplayer of the past 20 years?

Ozzie Smith



Trent
Chairborne "Nine of Diamonds" Ranger

...To be a great NCO, you need three bones: a backbone, a wishbone and a funny bone.
Add comment
David Marc Nieporent 24 May 2005 06:05:51 permanent link ]
 In article <cluke.3319$%Z2.156­0@lakeread08>,
"Captain 20" <c20@setyrtfj.77com­> wrote:
Who's the best ballplayer of the past 20 years?

Rafael Ramirez.

-------------------­--------------------­------
David M. Nieporent nieporen@alumni.pri­nceton.edu
Add comment
Tarkus 24 May 2005 06:24:13 permanent link ]
 On 5/23/2005 7:05:51 PM, David Marc Nieporent wrote:
In article <cluke.3319$%Z2.156­0@lakeread08>,> "Captain 20" <c20@setyrtfj.77com­> wrote:>
Who's the best ballplayer of the past 20 years?>
Rafael Ramirez.

I was gonna say Mark Lemke, but it's close.
--
Why are they called "stands" when they're made for sitting?

Now playing: the radio.
Add comment
Bryan S . Slick 24 May 2005 06:30:59 permanent link ]
 [Dan Bretta nudan92@yahoo.com]
[23 May 2005 19:00:10 -0700]

:Trent Woodruff wrote:

:> Ozzie Smith

:At least you're consistent.

And drunk, apparently.

The correct answer is Barry Bonds.

--
Bryan S. Slick, onyx_hokie at yahoo dot com

"To those who have fought for it,
freedom has a flavor the protected will never know."
Add comment
Jpm III 24 May 2005 06:38:35 permanent link ]
 Captain 20 wrote in news:cluke.3319$%Z2­.1560@lakeread08:>
Who's the best ballplayer of the past 20 years?

Depends. How accurate is all that Win Shares stuff?


Add comment
Joel K. 'Jay' Furr 24 May 2005 06:38:53 permanent link ]
 "Dan Bretta" <nudan92@yahoo.com>­ wrote in news:1116900010.452­259.45550
@g43g2000cwa.google­groups.com:
Trent Woodruff wrote:>> >Captain 20 was cut from the Baylor football team for saying...>>
Who's the best ballplayer of the past 20 years?>>
Ozzie Smith>>
At least you're consistent

Clemens or Greg Maddux. As a Braves fan I may be somewhat biased, but
Maddux was a hell of a pitcher and a hell of a fielder and didn't entirely
suck at the plate.

--
Ha'ina 'ia mai ana ka puana
Ha'ina 'ia mai ana ka puana
Ha'ina 'ia mai ana ka puana
Ha'ina 'ia mai ana ka puana
Add comment
Jpm III 24 May 2005 06:39:23 permanent link ]
 Tarkus wrote in news:zzaqv7vzfuag.d­lg@tarkus.karnevil9.­com:>
On 5/23/2005 7:05:51 PM, David Marc Nieporent wrote:>
In article <cluke.3319$%Z2.156­0@lakeread08>,> > "Captain 20" <c20@setyrtfj.77com­> wrote:> >
Who's the best ballplayer of the past 20 years?> >
Rafael Ramirez.>
I was gonna say Mark Lemke, but it's close.

Duh, Rafael Belliard!


Add comment
Jpm III 24 May 2005 06:40:27 permanent link ]
 Joel K. 'Jay' Furr wrote in news:Xns965FE6634C9­FEjfurrfurrsorg@216.­168.3.44:>
"Dan Bretta" <nudan92@yahoo.com>­ wrote in news:1116900010.452­259.45550> @g43g2000cwa.google­groups.com:>
Trent Woodruff wrote:> > > > Captain 20 was cut from the Baylor football team for saying...> > >
Who's the best ballplayer of the past 20 years?> > >
Ozzie Smith> > >
At least you're consistent>
Clemens or Greg Maddux. As a Braves fan I may be somewhat biased, but> Maddux was a hell of a pitcher and a hell of a fielder and didn't> entirely suck at the plate.

I'm a lifelong Braves fan who watched Maddux as closely as anyone during his
time with Atlanta, and I've never liked Clemens much... but I recognize
talent when I see it, and over the long haul, I think I prefer Clemens. Even
if I like Maddux more.


Add comment
Dale Hicks 24 May 2005 06:41:13 permanent link ]
 In article <Wswke.223$kv1.53@l­akeread02>, jpmccord@hotmail.co­m says...> Captain 20 wrote in news:cluke.3319$%Z2­.1560@lakeread08:> >
Who's the best ballplayer of the past 20 years?>
Depends. How accurate is all that Win Shares stuff?

Not at all.

--
Cranial Crusader dgh 1138 at bell south point net
Add comment
John Rogers 24 May 2005 06:47:53 permanent link ]
 Yeah, Tarkus <karnevil9@beer.com­>, well... that's just like... your
opinion man.
On 5/23/2005 7:05:51 PM, David Marc Nieporent wrote:>
In article <cluke.3319$%Z2.156­0@lakeread08>,>> "Captain 20" <c20@setyrtfj.77com­> wrote:>>
Who's the best ballplayer of the past 20 years?>>
Rafael Ramirez.>
I was gonna say Mark Lemke, but it's close.

The correct answer is Jeff Blauser, you dumnasses.


John Rogers
AU Class of 1985
The Nail Gun of Quiet Reflection
The Al Del Greco of Atlanta

"Subordination is the natural order: there is subordination in Heaven -
Thrones and Dominions take precendence over Powers and Principalities,
Archangels and ordinary foremast angels; and so it is in the Navy. You
have come to the wrong shop for anarchy, brother."

(Captain Jack Aubrey, R.N. "The Ionian Mission)
Add comment
Dvd Avins 24 May 2005 06:51:28 permanent link ]
 JPM III wrote:> Tarkus wrote in news:zzaqv7vzfuag.d­lg@tarkus.karnevil9.­com:>>On 5/23/2005 7:05:51 PM, David Marc Nieporent wrote:>>>In article <cluke.3319$%Z2.156­0@lakeread08>,>>> "Captain 20" <c20@setyrtfj.77com­> wrote:>>>
Who's the best ballplayer of the past 20 years?>>>
Rafael Ramirez.>>
I was gonna say Mark Lemke, but it's close.>
Duh, Rafael Belliard!

Chris Truby could eat them all for breakfast. And will.


--
Any time you get members of a government preaching out -against
government-, it's a sure bet they're looking to replace it with whatever
ELSE they own. -- Skyler Bode
Add comment
Corby Gilmore 24 May 2005 07:56:40 permanent link ]
 
"Captain 20" (c20@setyrtfj.77com­) writes:> Who's the best ballplayer of the past 20 years?


Neither one. As much as I am NOT a fan of his, I would rate ARod over
both of them.

--
Corby Gilmore
corby@ncf.ca
Add comment
The Dave© 24 May 2005 08:11:17 permanent link ]
 
Captain 20 wrote:> Who's the best ballplayer of the past 20 years?

Buddy Biancalana

--
Dave says... fire Dave Hudgens
Add comment
Jpm III 24 May 2005 11:24:07 permanent link ]
 Dvd Avins wrote in news:QEwke.9461$BF5­.4229@trndny06:>
JPM III wrote:> > Tarkus wrote in news:zzaqv7vzfuag.d­lg@tarkus.karnevil9.­com:> > > On 5/23/2005 7:05:51 PM, David Marc Nieporent wrote:> > > > In article <cluke.3319$%Z2.156­0@lakeread08>,> > > > "Captain 20" <c20@setyrtfj.77com­> wrote:> > > >
Who's the best ballplayer of the past 20 years?> > > >
Rafael Ramirez.> > >
I was gonna say Mark Lemke, but it's close.> >
Duh, Rafael Belliard!>
Chris Truby could eat them all for breakfast. And will.

Herb Washington?


Add comment
Jpm III 24 May 2005 11:25:01 permanent link ]
 Corby Gilmore wrote in news:d6u8lo$2am$1@t­heodyn.ncf.ca:>
"Captain 20" (c20@setyrtfj.77com­) writes:> > Who's the best ballplayer of the past 20 years?>
Neither one. As much as I am NOT a fan of his, I would rate ARod> over both of them.

Well if we were rating players who have played since 1986, I'd take Albert
Pujols.


Add comment
Captain 20 24 May 2005 17:53:10 permanent link ]
 
I'm a lifelong Braves fan who watched Maddux as closely as anyone during
time with Atlanta, and I've never liked Clemens much... but I recognize> talent when I see it, and over the long haul, I think I prefer Clemens.
Even> if I like Maddux more.

RJ is the only pitcher comparable to Clemens over the past 20 yrs. He's
ahead of maddux and pedro. Better than Clemens at his peak, too. Just not as
long-run consistent.


Add comment
Edward Ruggeri 24 May 2005 20:32:19 permanent link ]
 On Tue, 24 May 2005 08:53:10 -0500, Captain 20 <c20@setyrtfj.77com­> wrote:
RJ is the only pitcher comparable to Clemens over the past 20 yrs. He's> ahead of maddux and pedro.

Even as a Yankees fan, I still have to say that Pedro's ERA, and adjusted
ERA+ are amazing.

-- Ned Ruggeri
Add comment
Lance Freezeland 24 May 2005 23:11:52 permanent link ]
 On Mon, 23 May 2005 19:13:35 -0500, "Captain 20" <c20@setyrtfj.77com­>
gave us:
Who's the best ballplayer of the past 20 years?
^^^

Pee Wee Herman

--
Lance

"Economics played a role. Raleighs have gone
from six fifty to nine dollars a carton, but there's
a three-quarter cent coupon on the back. You
can get all kinds of things with them, blenders,
everything. I saved up enough one time and got
Al Bumbry." -- Earl Weaver

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensore­d-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed­s.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Add comment
Jpm III 25 May 2005 10:49:26 permanent link ]
 Captain 20 wrote in news:blGke.3977$%Z2­.296@lakeread08:>
I'm a lifelong Braves fan who watched Maddux as closely as anyone> > during his time with Atlanta, and I've never liked Clemens much...> > but I recognize talent when I see it, and over the long haul, I> > think I prefer Clemens. Even if I like Maddux more.>
RJ is the only pitcher comparable to Clemens over the past 20 yrs.> He's ahead of maddux and pedro. Better than Clemens at his peak, too.> Just not as long-run consistent.

Pedro shouldn't even be mentioned yet. Give him another five years and I
suspect he'll be comparable. If he lasts much longer than that, he might
even be considered more highly...


Add comment


Jpm III 25 May 2005 10:49:47 permanent link ]
 Edward Ruggeri wrote in news:op.sraf75c57qi­7tm@ned-ruggeri.uchi­cago.edu:>
On Tue, 24 May 2005 08:53:10 -0500, Captain 20 <c20@setyrtfj.77com­>> wrote:> > RJ is the only pitcher comparable to Clemens over the past 20 yrs.> > He's ahead of maddux and pedro.>
Even as a Yankees fan, I still have to say that Pedro's ERA, and> adjusted ERA+ are amazing.

Hits-per-9IP. People just can't hit him.


Add comment
Captain 20 25 May 2005 18:57:33 permanent link ]
 
RJ is the only pitcher comparable to Clemens over the past 20 yrs.> > He's ahead of maddux and pedro. Better than Clemens at his peak, too.> > Just not as long-run consistent.>
Pedro shouldn't even be mentioned yet. Give him another five years and I> suspect he'll be comparable.

Yes, he's certainly put up some years that are as good as anyone's, but
doesn't yet have the longevity.


--
"if federal judges have the final word over its meaning,
the Constitution would be a mere thing of wax in the hands
of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form
they please".

- Thomas Jefferson


Add comment


Tanner 25 May 2005 20:58:10 permanent link ]
 

Dave Melvin wrote:
"Captain 20" <c20@setyrtfj.77com­> wrote in message > news:cluke.3319$%Z2­.1560@lakeread08...>­
Who's the best ballplayer of the past 20 years?>>
Cal Riepken

You'd think if he were really the best player, you'd know how to spell
his name. Everyone knows it's spelled Ripkin.



GT

Add comment
Jpm III 26 May 2005 09:14:22 permanent link ]
 Captain 20 wrote in news:Gn0le.4044$%Z2­.778@lakeread08:>
RJ is the only pitcher comparable to Clemens over the past 20 yrs.> > > He's ahead of maddux and pedro. Better than Clemens at his peak,> > > too. Just not as long-run consistent.> >
Pedro shouldn't even be mentioned yet. Give him another five years> > and I suspect he'll be comparable.>
Yes, he's certainly put up some years that are as good as anyone's,> but doesn't yet have the longevity.

..."as good as"... Scratch that. Try "better than"! But, as you say, he
doesn't yet have the longevity. If his numbers are still the best in five
years, then he deserves much more acclaim!


Add comment


Dvd Avins 27 May 2005 00:28:39 permanent link ]
 JPM III wrote:> Captain 20 wrote in news:Gn0le.4044$%Z2­.778@lakeread08:>
RJ is the only pitcher comparable to Clemens over the past 20 yrs.>>>>He's ahead of maddux and pedro. Better than Clemens at his peak,>>>>too. Just not as long-run consistent.>>>
Pedro shouldn't even be mentioned yet. Give him another five years>>>and I suspect he'll be comparable.>>
Yes, he's certainly put up some years that are as good as anyone's,>>but doesn't yet have the longevity.>
..."as good as"... Scratch that. Try "better than"! But, as you say, he > doesn't yet have the longevity. If his numbers are still the best in five > years, then he deserves much more acclaim!

Better than on a per-inning basis, but unless you count IP within a
season a longevity instead of being better or worse, I don't think
Martinez's best seasons have been netter than Clemens' Maddux's and
Johnson's.

--
Any time you get members of a government preaching out -against
government-, it's a sure bet they're looking to replace it with whatever
ELSE they own. -- Skyler Bode
Add comment
Jpm III 27 May 2005 21:00:06 permanent link ]
 Dvd Avins wrote in news:Xjqle.2132$zb.­1006@trndny04:>
JPM III wrote:> > Captain 20 wrote in news:Gn0le.4044$%Z2­.778@lakeread08:> >
RJ is the only pitcher comparable to Clemens over the past 20> > > > > yrs. He's ahead of maddux and pedro. Better than Clemens at> > > > > his peak, too. Just not as long-run consistent.> > > >
Pedro shouldn't even be mentioned yet. Give him another five> > > > years and I suspect he'll be comparable.> > >
Yes, he's certainly put up some years that are as good as> > > anyone's, but doesn't yet have the longevity.> >
..."as good as"... Scratch that. Try "better than"! But, as you> > say, he doesn't yet have the longevity. If his numbers are still> > the best in five years, then he deserves much more acclaim!>
Better than on a per-inning basis, but unless you count IP within a> season a longevity instead of being better or worse, I don't think> Martinez's best seasons have been netter than Clemens' Maddux's and> Johnson's.

Maybe not all of them, but Pedro's 1997 was stellar:

241.1 IP, 158 H, 67 BB, 51 ER, 305 K, 1.90 ERA.

And Maddux's two best seasons were 1994 (202 IP) and 1995 (209.2 IP).
Granted, he pitched a lot more innings in other seasons with significantly
higher ERAs than his 1.56 and 1.63 those two years, and he was arguably more
valuable to his team for about five of those years, but I still say Maddux
and Martinez are comparable even now.

I look at it this way: Maddux has a 2.97 career ERA that began in the
low-offense late-80s (also take into consideration his rookie year ERA of
5.61 in the offensive explosion of 1987). But then, as hitting got better in
the 1990s, so did Maddux... Same thing with Clemens, except his numbers
bounced up and down since 1993. Clemens is definitely a dominant pitcher,
but he also gives up plenty of runs.

Martinez has a career 2.72 ERA almost exlusively in the high-offense era.
Maddux and Clemens both have a career ERA+ of 141 ... Pedro's is 167.
Granted, Pedro has pitched in about half as many innings (about 2300 to 4300
and 4500), but he'll retire with close to 3500 innings pitched and I think
his numbers will be better by that time. And, rate-wise. they already are.


Add comment
Dvd Avins 28 May 2005 21:08:38 permanent link ]
 JPM III wrote:

[disucssing Pedro's value over his career, vs. Maddux, Clemens, and
Johnson's,]

If you're comparing them all to an average pitcher, maybe Pedro's done
as much; I'll check before the end of this post. But if you consider
that any inning not covered by the pitchers you want will probably get
covered by lousy pitchers, Pedro's short career means that he just
hasn't taken enough innings away from the lousy pitchers.

I use .400-level pitching as replacement value win PWAR. (That's
Pitching Wins Above Replacement.) Here's what I get for all of them,
year by year:

Pitcher Clemens Maddux Johnson Martinez
1984 1.2
1985 2.5
1986 9.6 -0.2
1987 9.5 -0.5
1988 7.8 4.6 0.8
1989 6.6 5.9 0.0
1990 10.6 4.9 3.4
1991 9.9 5.5 2.7
1992 9.7 9.9 3.0 0.3
1993 2.6 10.2 7.0 3.5
1994 (short) 6.8 10.8 5.8 3.2
1995 (short) 2.6 11.0 9.4 4.1
1996 7.2 8.8 1.7 4.3
1997 12.8 9.9 9.4 11.5
1998 9.3 10.7 6.8 8.3
1999 1.8 4.8 10.8 10.8
2000 5.7 8.5 9.9 11.8
2001 5.4 7.1 10.3 4.9
2002 2.1 6.9 11.1 8.7
2003 3.7 3.0 1.9 8.7
2004 6.6 3.8 9.4 5.1
total 132 123 103 86

Compared to average pitching, instead of replacement-level..­.
total 83 77 65 60

Comparing to average is a mistake when assessing value, but here it is.
It brings Pedro closer, but he's still behind the other three for now.
Maybe not all of them, but Pedro's 1997 was stellar:>
241.1 IP, 158 H, 67 BB, 51 ER, 305 K, 1.90 ERA.

In a league-park context of 4.21.

In the very same year, Clemens had an ERA of 2.05 over 264 IP in a
league-park context of 4.62. Given the difference in leagues, Clemens
pitched longer and better.
And Maddux's two best seasons were 1994 (202 IP) and 1995 (209.2 IP).

Those were short seasons. He may have had 'only' 10.8 and 11.0 PWAR
those years, but he was both a workhorse and about as dominating as
could be. Especially in 1994.

<snip>
Maddux and Clemens both have a career ERA+ of 141 ... Pedro's is 167.

A 141 ERA+ translates to about a .665 W%. A 178 ERA+ translates to about
.736. So if they all pitched about 127 IP, you could expect Pedro's
teams to win one more game. But then Clemens and Maddux go on to pitch
more, against weak pitchers. And Clemens's and Maddux's teams would win
an extra game for every 34 IP that Clemens or Maddux pitched while Pedro
was on the bench.

Randy Johnson's ERA+ is a smidge better than Clemens' and Johnson's. his
144 translates to about a .675 W%.


--
Any time you get members of a government preaching out -against
government-, it's a sure bet they're looking to replace it with whatever
ELSE they own. -- Skyler Bode
Add comment
Jpm III 29 May 2005 09:16:36 permanent link ]
 
I use .400-level pitching as replacement value win PWAR. (That's> Pitching Wins Above Replacement.) Here's what I get for all of them,> year by year:>
Pitcher Clemens Maddux Johnson Martinez> 1984 1.2> 1985 2.5> 1986 9.6 -0.2> 1987 9.5 -0.5> 1988 7.8 4.6 0.8> 1989 6.6 5.9 0.0> 1990 10.6 4.9 3.4> 1991 9.9 5.5 2.7> 1992 9.7 9.9 3.0 0.3> 1993 2.6 10.2 7.0 3.5> 1994 (short) 6.8 10.8 5.8 3.2> 1995 (short) 2.6 11.0 9.4 4.1> 1996 7.2 8.8 1.7 4.3> 1997 12.8 9.9 9.4 11.5> 1998 9.3 10.7 6.8 8.3> 1999 1.8 4.8 10.8 10.8> 2000 5.7 8.5 9.9 11.8> 2001 5.4 7.1 10.3 4.9> 2002 2.1 6.9 11.1 8.7> 2003 3.7 3.0 1.9 8.7> 2004 6.6 3.8 9.4 5.1> total 132 123 103 86>
Compared to average pitching, instead of replacement-level..­.> total 83 77 65 60

Simple sums of first thirteen seasons:

Greg: 91.5
Roger: 86.6
Pedro: 85.2
Johnson: 70.7

This does not consider age. Using bb-ref's method, Pedro started at age 20,
so his 13th season counts as age 32. Reducing the others to age 32 means:
only Randy's first 9 seasons count, Roger's first 12, and no change for
Greg.

Simple sums through age 32 (according to bb-ref age):

Greg: 91.5
Pedro: 85.2
Roger: 79.4
Johnson: 33.8

Okay, so now longevity really is what matters! Clemens has lasted a good
while (having ups and downs along the way), Johnson has obviously enjoyed
most of his prime in his 30's, and Maddux was solidly brilliant from his
mid-20s to mid-30s.

Martinez has obviously been mostly brilliant throughout his 20s, and if he
manages to make it a 20-season career, he'll get another 7 seasons
(including this year). If he *averages* even a 5 PWAR for those seven
seasons, he's at 120+ when he retires. And I suspect he'll have a couple
more really good seasons to get to 120 by the end of 2007 or at least
2008 -- when he'll be 36.

Clemens is on a good pace to raise the bar a little more this year, but I
expect Martinez will be the only pitcher who compares to Clemens by the time
they're both finished. Unless Clemens keeps pitching effectively into his
mid-40s.


Add comment
 

Add new comment

As:
Login:  Password:  
 
 
  
 
Пожалуйста, относитесь к собеседникам уважительно, не используйте нецензурные слова, не злоупотребляйте заглавными буквами, не публикуйте рекламу и объявления о купле/продаже, а также материалы нарушающие сетевой этикет или УК РФ.


GYXU > Baseball > Bonds or Clemens? 29 May 2005 09:16:36

see also:
De Rossi with the Bionic Elbow!
пройди тесты:
see also:
...

  Copyright © 2001—2008 GYXU
Idea: Miсhael Monashev
Помощь и задать вопросы можно в сообществе support.gyxu.com.
Сообщения об ошибках оставляем в сообществе bugs.gyxu.com.
Предложения и комментарии пишем в сообществе suggest.gyxu.com.
Информация для родителей.
Write us at:
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please .