Thursday, 24 January 2008
|
| The inevitable result of the NCAA's schedule tinkering Tony Lima 03:22:43 |
| | Stanford plays almost non-stop baseball from Feb. 22 - May
25. Fifty-five games packed into 94 fun-filled days (and
evenings). Any illusions we may have had about the NCAA
supporting student athletes are now laid to rest.
Gruesome details available at
http://gostanford.cstv.com/sports/m-basebl/sched/stan-m-basebl-sched.html
- Tony
|
| |  2 answer | Add comment |
Wednesday, 2 January 2008
|
| M-I 5`Persecuti on ` their methods an d tactics Guest 12:16:02 |
| | -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=. MI5: methods and tactics -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
They deliberately set out to harass in a way that would. resemble the
symptoms of schizophrenia, so. that any report of the harassment would be
taken as indicating mental illness and "treated" accordingly.. They never
show their. own faces; they only work through proxies, in the media, among
the public, and. by manipulating people in the workplace. Since they do not
declare their identity there is no evidence to initiate legal. action
against the security services or anyone else.. The only people you can
prosecute are the proxies and they will. deny knowledge of any conspiracy.
By repeatedly. humiliating and abusing the victim, they induced mental
illness. This is the worst. form of human rights violation: making any
statement of the harassment appear to be symptomatic of. the illness which
they cause through the harassment. That this can happen, and. people collude
by silence, is. absolutely horrifying.
From the beginning in June 1990 they set. a pattern of harassment which they
have followed without change for the last six years.. They paint me as a
"threat" to which people. must "react" (shades of Nazi persecution methods),
while simultaneously portraying their. hate campaign on which they have
spent over a million. pounds of taxpayers money as a "joke".
The MI5 that breaks the law with the silent complicity of. the police is the
same agency that is. now seeking a role in the fight against crime. Perhaps
the real joke. is the proposed involvement in the implementation of justice
of an. organisation which commits criminal acts with secrecy and disinterest
for the. legal process.
557
|
| | 20 answers | Add comment |
Tuesday, 1 January 2008
|
| M`I,5`P ersecution - co st of th e oper ation Guest 13:51:42 |
| | -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=. MI5: cost of the operation -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Here's what a couple of other. people on Usenet (uk.misc) had to say
regarding the cost of running such. an operation...
PO:. >Have some sense, grow up and smell reality. What you are talking about
PO: >would take loads. of planning, tens of thousands of pounds and lots of
PO: >people involved in the planning,. execution and maintenance of it. You
PO: >must have a very high opinion. of yourself to think you are worth it.
PM: >But why? And why you? Do you realize how. much it would cost to keep
PM: >one person under continuous. surveillance for five years? Think about
PM: >all. the man/hours. Say they _just_ allocated a two man team and a
PM: >supervisor. OK.,. Supervisor's salary, say, #30,000 a year. Two men,
PM: >#20,000 a year each. But they'd need to work in. shifts -- so it would
PM: >be six men at #20,000 (which with on-costs would work out at. more like
PM: >#30,000 to. the employer.)
PM:. >
PM: >So, we're talking #30,000 x 6. #180,000. plus say, #40,000 for. the
PM: >supervisor. #220,000. Then you've got the. hardware involved. And
PM: >any transcription that needs doing.. You don't think the 'Big Boss'
PM: >would listen to hours and hours of tapes,. do you.
PM:. >
PM: >So, all in all, you couldn't actually do. the job for much less than
PM: >a quarter million a year. Over five years. What. are you doing that makes
PM: >it worth. the while of the state to spend over one and a quarter million
PM: >on. you?
Those are pretty much the. sort of calculations that went through my head
once I stopped to consider what it must be costing them. to run this
operation. The partial answer is, there have been periods. when the
intensity has been greater, and times when little. has happened. In fact,
for much of 1993 and the first half of 1994, very. little happened. Although
I don't. think that was for reasons of money - if they can tap into the
taxpayer they're not. going to be short of resources, are they?
The more complete answer is in the enormity of what they're doing.. Relative
to the cost to British. pride of seeing their country humiliated for the
persecution of their own citizens, isn't is worth the. cost of four or five
people to try to bring. things to a close in the manner they would wish? To
the government a million or two is. quite honestly nothing - if they can
convince themselves of. the necessity of what they're doing, resources will
not be. the limiting factor.
7848
|
| | 20 answers | Add comment |
|
| M.I 5.Pe rsecution - Capita l Ra dio - Chris Tarran t Guest 13:25:15 |
| | -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=
-= Capital. Radio - Chris Tarrant -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=
Capital. Radio DJs have been "in on it" from the start. One of the first
things I heard in the summer. of 1990 was from a Capital DJ who said, "If
he listens to Capital then he. can't be all bad" (supportive, you see. We're
not. bastards). Much of what came over the radio in 1990 is now so far away
the precise details have. been obliterated by time. No diary was kept of the
details, and although archives. if they exist may give pointers, the
ambiguity of what broadcasters said would. leave that open to
re-interpretation.
In spring 1994,. Chris Tarrant on his Capital morning show made an aside to
someone else in the studio, about a. person he didn't identify. He said,
"You know this bloke? He says we're trying to kill him. We. should be done
for. attempted manslaughter".
That mirrored something I had said a. day or two before. What Tarrant said
was understood by the staff. member in the studio he was saying it to; they
said, "Oh no, don't say that" to Tarrant. If any archives exist of. the
morning show (probably unlikely) then. it could be found there; what he said
was so out of context that he would be very hard. put to find an explanation.
A. couple of days later, someone at the site where I was working repeated the
remark although in a different way; they said there had been. people in a
computer room when. automatic fire extinguishers went off and those people
were "thinking. of suing for attempted manslaughter".
Finally, this isn't confined to the established radio stations.. In 1990
after I. had listened to a pirate radio station in South London for about
half an hour, there was an audible phone call. in the background, followed
by total silence for a few moments, then shrieks. of laughter. "So what are
we supposed to say now? Deadly torture?. He's going to talk to us now, isn't
he?", which meant that they could hear. what I would say in my room.
5418
|
| | 23 answer | Add comment |
|
| M`I'5.Per secution - bugging an d counter-surveill ance Guest 12:59:00 |
| | -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= MI5: bugging. and counter-surveillance -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
PO: >Did you ever. look for the bugs in your house ? If not, why not ? I mean if
PO: >I thought that was happening to me, I'd search the place from. top to bottom,
PO: >I mean I. live there I would know if anything was out of place. If I was
PO: >really suspicious, I would call in one of those bug detection teams. which
PO: >have those machines that pick up the. transmitted radio waves. This
PO:. >reminds me of BUGS, that new programme on BBC1 on
That's exactly what we did. We went to a competent, professional. detective
agency in London, paid them over 400 quid. to debug our house. They used
scanner devices which go to over 1 GHz and. would pick up any nearby
transmitter in that. range, they also checked the phones and found
nothing... but if the. tap was at the exchange, then they wouldn't find
anything,. would they?
CS: >Doesn't this. suggest to you that there are, in fact, no bugs to be found?
You can assume that they've done this sort of thing to other people. in more
"serious" cases, where they would know the targets would suspect. the
presence of electronic. surveillance. So they will have developed techniques
and devices which are. not readily detectable either by visual inspection or
by electronic means. What those techniques might be, I. couldn't guess.
In this case, the existence of bugging devices was. clear from the
beginning, and they "rubbed it in" with what was said by the boy. on the
coach.. It was almost as if they wanted counter-surveillance people to be
called in, who they knew would fail. to detect the bugging devices, causing
loss of. credibility to the other things I would have to say relating to the
harassment.
I did all the things. someone in my situation would do to try to find the
bugs. In addition to. calling in professional help using electronic
counter-surveillance, I made a close visual inspection. of electrical
equipment, plus any points where audio or video surveillance devices. might
have been concealed. Of course, I found nothing.. Normal surveillance
"mini-cameras" are quite. noticeable and require visible supporting
circuitry. It seems to me the best place to put. a small video surveillance
device would be additional to a piece. of electronic equipment such as a TV
or video. It would be. necessary to physically break in to a property to fit
such a. device.
2988
|
| | 18 answers | Add comment |
|
| M.I 5`Persec ution - th e BBC , television and rad io Guest 12:31:59 |
| | -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=
-= the BBC, television and. radio -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=
The first incident in. June 1990 was when a BBC newsreader made what seemed
to be a reaction to something which. had happened in my home, and out of
context of what they were reading. My first reaction was disbelief;. nothing
of the sort had ever happened before, the idea that such a. thing could
occur had not crossed my mind, yet there was no. doubt of what had just
taken place. My disbelief eroded. as this recurred time after time. Besides
the news,. offenders included shows such as Crimewatch (!), Newsnight, and
"entertainment" shows. There seems. to be very little moral understanding
among the people who make these. programmes; they just assume they will
never be caught, so they carry on without a thought for the. illegality or
amorality of what they do. The only time. I ever heard a word raised in
doubt was by. Paxman being interviewed by someone else (I think by Clive
Anderson) back in 1990;. referring to the "watching" he said it troubled
him, and when asked by the host what you. could do about it, replied "Well,
you could just switch it off". (meaning the surveillance monitor in the
studio). He clearly. didn't let his doubts stand in the way of continued
surreptitious spying from his own or other. people's shows, though.
Now you're convinced this is a troll, aren't you? This story has. been the
subject of much debate on the uk.* Usenet newsgroups for over a. year, and
some readers. believe it to be an invention (it has even been suggested that
a group. of psychology students are responsible!), others think it
symptomatic of a derangement of. the author, and a few give it credence.
Quite a few people do know part or. all of the story already, so this text
will. fill in the gaps in their knowledge. For the rest, what may persuade
you of the third possibility is that some. of the incidents detailed are
checkable against any archives of radio and TV programmes. that exist; that
the incidents. involve named people (even if those hiding in the shadows
have not made their identity or affiliations evident), and. those people
may be. persuaded to come out with the truth; and that the campaign of
harassment is continuing today both in the UK and on. the American
continent, in a none-too-secret fashion; by its nature the significant. risk
of exposure increases. with time.
On several occasions people said to my face that. harassment from the TV was
happening.. On the first day I worked in Oxford, I spent the evening in the
local pub with the company's technical director Ian,. and Phil, another
employee. Ian made a few references to me and. said to Phil, as if in an
aside, "Is he the. bloke who's been on TV?" to which Phil replied, "Yes, I
think. so".
I made a number of efforts. to find the bugs, without success; last year we
employed professional counter-surveillance people to scan for. bugs (see
later) again without result. In autumn 1990 I disposed of my TV and. watched
virtually no television for the. next three years. But harassment from TV
stations has gone on for over six years and continues to this. day. This is
something that many people obviously know is. happening; yet the TV staff
have the morality of paedophiles, that because they're getting away with. it
they feel no. wrong.
Other people who were involved in the abuse in 1990 were DJs. on BBC radio
stations, notably disc jockeys from. Radio 1 and other stations (see the
following section). Again, since they. don't have sense in the first place
they can't be expect to have the. moral sense not to be part of criminal
harassment.
558
|
| | 21 answer | Add comment |
Sunday, 16 December 2007
|
| MI5-Persecution: MI5 Waste Taxpayer Millions on Pointless Hate-Campaign (18618) Guest 17:58:37 |
| |
MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 30 April, 1999
If You Intend To Reply, Please Read This
Please.... keep your response to one page!. Faxes over a page or two will
be deleted without being read.
Somewhere between 0 and 100%
The last few days there have been no clear recordable instances of
abuse. However, while travelling on the Underground, while walking around
near my home and going to friends homes, I am constantly troubled by
thoughts that those people over there might be about to get at me; that
the couple sitting in the opposite seats laughing are in fact laughing at
me; et cetera, et cetera.
A comment by a scientist to the BSE inquiry sticks in my mind. He
described the possible scale of the epidemic as "between 0% and 100%". It
might not be happening, it might not happen at all, to any discernable
degree.... or it might be total. Without clear recording, which seems to
have become impossible the last couple of weeks, there is no way of
knowing whether the harassment really is continuing, whether we have
entered a temporary hiatus, or whether perhaps it has perhaps stopped for
now.
But for the time being I think there arent any reasons to dicontinue these
faxes. I only re-started them six weeks ago in response to a resumption of
MI5 harassment; and I think I will need to be more convinced of absence of
persecution before I discontinue my complaints.
The Newscasters are still watching
In the last few weeks there have been at least a couple of fairly overt
instances of "interactive watching" by newscasters. I reported this in a
previous "MI5 Persecution Update".
These instances are really very rare compared to 1990-91, when there were
many dozens of such occurrences. Undoubtedly the reduction is due to my
practice of videotaping everything I see. Recently I had the opportunity
of showing this years "happenings" (Jon Snow/Nicholas Witchell) to my
psychiatrist, and he agreed that in both cases the newscasters were
expressing merriment without visible cause, and that objectively it might
be possible for my claims to be true - although of course other people
reported similar thoughts to him, and this thinking is usually a symptom
of illness.
Read About the MI5 Persecution on the World Wide Web
The March 1998 issue (number 42) of .net Magazine reviews the website
describing it as an "excellent site". Since August 11, 1996 over 50,000
people have browsed this website.
You are encouraged to read the web pages which include
a FAQ (frequently asked questions) section outlining the nature of the
persecutors, their methods of harassment through the media, people at work
and among the general public
an evidence section, which carries audio and video clips of media and
workplace harassment, rated according to how directly I think they refer to me
objective descriptions of the state security agencies involved
scanned texts of the complaints I have made to media and state security
agencies involved
posts which have been made to netnews over the last four years on this topic
Keith Hill MP (Labour - Streatham), my elected representative, as ever
refuses to help.
MI5 Waste Taxpayer Millions on Pointless Hate-Campaign
Recently I was talking to an independent observer about the nature and
purpose of the perceived campaign of persecution against me. The person I
spoke to, a highly intelligent man, said he was struck by the utter
pointlessness of the perceived campaign against me. He also said that, if
my theories were in fact true, many people would have to be involved, in
the surveillance itself, and in the technical side of the delivery of
information from my home to TV studios for example, if the "interactive
watching" were happening as described. He voiced these thoughts without
any prompting from me; but both I and other observers had arrived at
pretty much the same conclusions, some years ago.
I saw a team of four men at Toronto Airport in 1993
To carry out the surveillance alone, full-time, would employ four or five
men, or their equivalent in terms of man-hours. Each man would "work" an
eight-hour shift, so you would need at least three men doing the
surveillance, plus a connecting link / manager. An indicator that this
estimate is correct arrived in 1993, when I was accosted by one of a group
of four men at Toronto Airport; he said, laughing, "if he tries to run
away well find him". Plainly these were the men who had been involved in
the intrusive surveillance of me for the preceding three years.
On other occasions, I have seen the same man on two or three occasions. On
one such occasion, at Ottawas Civic Hospital in November 1996; he gave his
name to the doctor as "Alan Holdsworth" or some such; my hearing is not
very good sometimes and I am not sure of the surname, although I am sure
"Alan" was his first name. I saw exactly the same man again in Ottawa, at
the airport, in July 1998. Obviously, other people must be "working" with
this person; he would not be the sole agent employed in this case.
Usenet readers views on the Cost to MI5 of Running the Campaign
Here's what a couple of other people on internet newsgroups / Usenet
(uk.misc) had to say regarding the cost of running such an operation...
PO: >Have some sense, grow up and smell reality. What you are talking about
PO: >would take loads of planning, tens of thousands of pounds and lots of
PO: >people involved in the planning, execution and maintenance of it. You
PO: >must have a very high opinion of yourself to think you are worth it.
and......
PM: >But why? And why you? Do you realize how much it would cost to keep
PM: >one person under continuous surveillance for five years? Think about
PM: >all the man/hours. Say they _just_ allocated a two man team and a
PM: >supervisor. OK., Supervisor's salary, say, #30,000 a year. Two men,
PM: >#20,000 a year each. But they'd need to work in shifts -- so it would
PM: >be six men at #20,000 (which with on-costs would work out at more
like
PM: >#30,000 to the employer.)
PM: >
PM: >So, we're talking #30,000 x 6. #180,000. plus say, #40,000 for the
PM: >supervisor. #220,000. Then you've got the hardware involved. And
PM: >any transcription that needs doing. You don't think the 'Big Boss'
PM: >would listen to hours and hours of tapes, do you.
PM: >
PM: >So, all in all, you couldn't actually do the job for much less than
PM: >a quarter million a year. Over five years. What are you doing that makes
PM: >it worth the while of the state to spend over one and a quarter million
PM: >on you?
Those are pretty much the sort of calculations that went through my head
once I stopped to consider what it must be costing them to run this
operation. At the very least, a quarter million a year - and probably much
more, given the intrusive and human-resource-intensive methods
employed. Times nine years. Equals well over two million pounds - and
probably much, much more.
Its wasteful for someone with my skills to be unemployed
The wastefulness of the MI5 campaign against me is not just that of futile
expenditure on their side. It is also extremely wasteful for someone with
my talents to be unemployed and on a disability pension. I am highly
qualified in numerate disciplines, yet am unable to work, specifically
because of the MI5 hate-campaign against me. It is a terrible waste of
resources for a supposedly efficient economy like that of the UK to be
squandering the talents of a skilled and capable worker.
I made every effort to remain in employment for as long as I could, but
ultimately I was defeated by MI5s employment of massive resources
specifically targeted on my workplaces with the sole aim of seeing me
evicted from those workplaces. You might expect this sort of behaviour
from the Stasi or some other secret police force in a communist country
where labour is cheap, and the governments aim on seeing its citizens
confined; but for a supposedly free and efficient economy like Britains,
the wastefulness resulting both directly and indirectly from the Security
Services activities is simply criminal, and should never be allowed.
The international dimension means the costs are multiplied many times
overoer had any sense, then they have surely taken leave of them over the
last nine years.
Four years of persecution in Canada
The persecution re-started within less than five minutes of my arrival in
Canada, as documented above, and in the "frequently asked
questions" article on the website. The words, "if he tries to run away
well find him" spoken by one of the harassers at Toronto Airport are now
imprinted on my mind.
A year later I emigrated to Canada, intending to find a job and settle
there, hoping that MI5s interest in me might dim with time. I did manage
to find work there, but my hopes of avoiding Security Service interest
were ground into dust. As detailed above, I saw the same man in November
1996 and July 1998, both times in Ottawa. Apart from these encounters,
there were numerous incidents between 1994 and 1998 of harassment, of an
identical nature and in most cases using identical words to what had
occurred in the UK. It became quite clear to me that the permanent
surveillance and harassment operation which MI5 had subjected me to in
England was being continued.
For a team of four or five men to be employed overseas must cost a lot
more than if they operate in their home country. And for MI5 to continue
the operation for a period of over four years, continuously, must cost
many hundreds of thousands of pounds. This confirms my belief that the
state is funding the campaign against mehat the Security Service receives
current annual funding of #160M. Divided by 1850 staff, works out at
#86,000. But the unit annual cost of each "watcher" must be much higher
than this, especially given the frequently mobile and overseas nature of
their actions of the last few years. A very conservative figure might be a
little over #100,000 pa for each of a team of five people, or half a
million pounds per year. For nine years, so far. So the most conservative
estimate of the surveillance element alone is perhaps four or five million
pounds since 1990.
This guesstimate is of course theoretical - I am not privy to inside
details of how MI5 split their funding. But to take some other examples,
the cost of a US counter-surveillance specialist per day is USD
5,000. Even if the agents permanently assigned to me are not of this
calibre - even if they employ specialists when difficult work planting
bugs etc is encountered - their salary and support costs must still be
very high. The individual agents are doing well for themselves as they are
well-paid to exercise psychopathic instincts which in any sane society
would see them in prison; but the taxpayers who must fund this terribly
wasteful exercise are being "done" out of hundreds of thousands of pounds
each year.
It must be emphasised that the above estimates are highly
conservative. Besides the surveillance operation, it must carry a high
cost in man-hours to propagate covert slanders through the population; to
setup and maintain the "interactive watching" links to TV and radio
stations, which these organisations continue desparately to "lie and
deny"; and to induce antipathy in co-workers which would not otherwise
exist.
Why they are wasting Millions of Pounds on a "Nobody from South London"
As remarked in the prologue to this article, it is really most
extraordinary that the Security Service spends a chunk of its budget,
every year for nine years so far, on a meaningless campaign against a
"nobody from South London". That they are spending such a large amount of
money has been confirmed to me on several occasions, usually by oblique
references to "its costing this country millions". The supposed
"logic" behind the persecution is that MI5 wish to avoid their harassment
of me, and the involvement of the UK media, to be made public; yet as the
reader will appreciate that is a circular argument, "theyre doing it
because they want to keep it secret and avoid humiliation for themselves
and their country" begs the question, "why did they start doing it in the
first place?", to which in truth I myself do not know the answer.
Plainly MI5 with its rich budget can afford half a million pounds a year
to waste on a "nobody from South London". Some time ago I was talking to a
British surveillance professional on Compuserve who told me "this work
costs a lot of money and is usally because the person I am following has
done something (usually criminal) to warrant all this money and time being
spent." Yet in this particular case it is plainly not the "victims
fault" that the harassment is taking place. The hate-campaign against me
is completely the creation of the obsessive psychologies of the MI5 agents
who have made themselves my persecutors; it is obviously a
"personal" campaign for them, and for years they misuse taxpayer funding
to feed their insane, unnatural and fixated fantasies.
18618
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
|
| | Add comment |
|
| MI5-Persecution: How Could It Be True? (1154) Guest 14:01:40 |
| |
MI5 Persecution: How Could It Be True?
If you have the patience to read these articles you will be struck by how
apparently fantastic the claims being put forward are. You may ask
yourself why such seemingly nonsensical assertions are made. This matter
has been discussed on the Internets UK-local newsgroups for three years
now, and the denizens of the uk.misc newsgroup (the so-called
"miscreants") have come up with a number of theories to explain these
posts; it has been variously suggested that they are a troll (an
artificial creation for the amusement of its author), that they are made
by MI5 themselves with the purpose of discrediting other conspiracy
theories, and that the poster is mentally ill and the articles are
symptomatic of the illness (the view held by most miscreants).
Are these claims the product of mental illness, or is that just a cover?
The most obvious explanation, that the claims made result from the
admitted mental illness of the author, is the one which the persecutors
intend be the one accepted without consideration being given to the
possibility of the claims being true. The persecutors have actually been
very clever about this, both in selecting as their target someone who was
known from school or university as being borderline schizophrenic, and in
ensuring the nature of their persecution corresponds to what often
features in the delusions of a schizophrenic.
The very first incident of the persecution occurred in June 1990, when I
was still a student at university in London. It consisted of a reaction
(giggling) from the newsreader, Sue Carpenter of ITN, to what she saw
happening in my living-room at my parents home where I was living. Before
your imagination gets the better of you I should make clear that what the
newsreader was reacting to was not too embarrassing in nature; my mother
had brought an apple for me into the the room, and Sue Carpenter found
this amusing.
I recognized that Carpenter had reacted to what she had seen in my
living-room, yet this idea still seemed completely fantastic to me. My
reaction was to continue watching television, particularly the news, to
see if this incident would be repeated. It was, many times, both on BBC
and ITV. An intelligent person would have thought to obtain a video
recorder and capture some of these incidents in order to try to explain to
an observer what he saw in these broadcasts. Unfortunately, I failed this
test of intelligence, since I did not record these programmes. I have
recently attempted to obtain from ITN tapes of their news programmes
dating back to summer 1990, but, unhappily, they have advised me that they
do not have complete programmes including newsreaders comments dating back
to that period.
From the outset, the persecutors structured their actions to ensure that
any complaint would be met with disbelief, and dismissed as
delusional. This is why they chose as their target someone who was known
at school and university to be borderline mentally ill; and it is why they
fired the first shots of their campaign through the broadcast
media. Schizophrenics commonly believe the media harass them; it would be
exceptional for "full-duplex television" to exist in reality. Those with
schizophrenia also commonly believe people are talking about them; again,
the persecutors have shown themselves very rarely, but act through
intermediaries, both in the workplace, and in public and during travel.
Mental illness is not the cause of these claims, but the simulation of its
symptoms is a cover used by the persecutors to deny their victim the
ability to have his compaints believed.
What evidence exists to support these claims of "interactive
television/radio";?
Quite frankly, I have very little evidence to support my claims. You may
examine the "Evidence" area of my website to see such evidence as I have
been able to gather. None of it is remotely conclusive. The "smoking
guns" all date back to 1990/91, and it is really rather late now to start
trying to look for material dating back seven or eight years. In 1997 I
started tape-recording every programme I watched or listened to. I also
started carrying with me a high-fidelity minidisc-recorder with good
quality microphone to catch incidents of public harassment, but this also
has not been as successful or conclusive as I had hoped.
Perhaps the best item in the "Evidence" section is the audio file "Life is
so hard" (it is labelled with Garfield the cartoon character on the site),
which I have given a certainty level of 100%. This item relates to
harassment at my workplace in Canada in 1996. A co-worker called Mark was
coming up with phrases and expressions which were repeating things being
said at my Canadian residence, consequently leading me to believe that my
apartment and home phone were bugged, and that the persecutors were
passing their gathered information on to Mark. On one particular evening I
said in my apartment, "life is so hard, and then you die". The following
day I was able to record Mark saying exactly the same phrase at work.
Unfortunately when "they" know you are recording them, they simply dont
say things which would unambiguously show harassment. When Mark the
co-worker knew he was being recorded, he only made his remarks out of
range of the recorder, for example outside the building. When the TV
newscasters or radio disc jockeys know they are being taped, they limit
themselves to saying things which are ambiguous, which even in my mind may
or may not be personally directed against me.
Who knows about this persecution?
Surprisingly many people know. People in the media, such as BBC and ITN
newscasters including Martyn Lewis and Michael Buerk, and radio disc
jockeys such as Chris Tarrant of Capital Radio, know what is going on, and
take part in it. Some co-workers at my former workplaces in England and
Canada have known about the harassment. Quite a few people in the general
public are also included. I believe the police are aware of the
persecution, but, unfortunately, have chosen not to take any action to
stop it. I have complained at my local police station in London several
years ago, and I have stated on the internet newsgroups that I have done
so, hence the police will be well aware of my wish to see the matter
resolved. I believe their inaction denotes a dereliction of duty, but
without good evidence, I am powerless to compel them to take steps to
prevent further harassment, or deal with what has already taken place.
What is the purpose of sending these faxes?
These faxes are being sent to three distinct groups of people, namely
Members of Parliament, the media, and diplomats & legal people. As you
will have observed I am making use of the email-to-fax gateway at Demon
Internet to send these faxes. I am forced to use this gateway since I
currently live in North America, and cannot afford the high cost of direct
phone calls to the UK.
My purpose in publicising my claims is firstly to discourage the
persecutors from continuing their campaign, and also to attempt to bring
their campaign out into the open, and thus perhaps identify the
persecutors. Neither aim has been achieved yet, but I hope that with
sufficient stimulation these aims may yet be accomplished.
The problem with the second aim is that those who read this article will
fall into two groups, those who dont know anything about the persecution
and consequently will disbelieve my claims as delusional, and those who do
know about the harassment and may have some idea of who is behind it, but
realise that if the harassers are exposed and the truth brought out into
the open, then powerful British institutions will substantially lose
prestige, and be exposed to ridicule.
It would give me hope to believe that these faxes will create a third
group of people, those who find out that I am telling the truth, and who
follow their consciences in standing up and seeing justice done. Only time
will tell if this hope will be realized.
1154
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
|
| | Add comment |
Monday, 3 December 2007
|
| Baseball Management Game Xrak 18:39:34 |
| | In Franchise Baseball at www.simgalaxy.com, you are the General Manager
and the Owner of your own Baseball Franchise!
You decide what your lineup will be, who gets benched, which players
play at what positions and more!
As the General Manager:
You make all the calls on players. Do you want to sign a free agent to
help your team make a playoff run? Do you want to train players? Or is
trading with another team the best option? Your star goes down with an
injury, do you put him on the DL? Player moves make all the difference,
choose wisely and you will be on your way to the playoffs, choose poorly
and you have to hope for good draft picks for next season.
As the Owner:
You need to set prices for tickets, buy advertising, sign concession
contracts and merchandise contracts, build new stadiums and lots more.
You need to make sure that your team is making money to keep the talent
rolling in, and the fans. You can even change the dimensions on your
ballpark to suit your team better!
Franchise Baseball is a fantastic web based baseball management game
that plays year round! No off-season. Each night user controlled teams
face off and play through a 162 game season. At the end of the season,
the top teams in each conference are seeded in the playoffs. Don’t
wait! Sign up for a free trial team today at www.simgalaxy.com .
|
| | Add comment |
Monday, 26 November 2007
|
| Schedule Fever Robert Broughton 08:50:01 |
| | Embry-Riddle:
http://daytona.embryriddlesports.com/SportSelect.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=11500&KEY=&SPID=4503&SPSID=47798
The Eagles have a new coach, Randy Stegall. Their season starts Jan. 29, and
they have a total of one game outside of Florida.
Western Oregon:
http://www.wouwolves.com/bsb/schedule.php
The Wolves open at UCSD on Feb. 1, have a home series vs. San Francisco
State Feb. 14-16 (brrr!)
Montana State-Billings:
http://www.msubillings.edu/athletics/Baseball/schedule.htm
All right, college baseball in Montana. Their first home game isn't until
March 25. This is the third year of the program, and they are moving from
the Heartland Conference to the Great Northwest Athletic Conference.
--
Bob Broughton
http://broughton.ca/
Vancouver, BC, Canada
"There is no rational, moral or economic argument for the continuation
of the manufacture, sale or use of smoking tobacco."
- Robert Starkey, http://smokefreerevolution.org/, 03/18/2007
|
| | 4 answer | Add comment |
Saturday, 24 November 2007
|
| MI5 Persecution: How Could It Be True? (5499) Guest 10:50:08 |
| |
MI5 Persecution: How Could It Be True?
If you have the patience to read these articles you will be struck by how
apparently fantastic the claims being put forward are. You may ask
yourself why such seemingly nonsensical assertions are made. This matter
has been discussed on the Internets UK-local newsgroups for three years
now, and the denizens of the uk.misc newsgroup (the so-called
"miscreants") have come up with a number of theories to explain these
posts; it has been variously suggested that they are a troll (an
artificial creation for the amusement of its author), that they are made
by MI5 themselves with the purpose of discrediting other conspiracy
theories, and that the poster is mentally ill and the articles are
symptomatic of the illness (the view held by most miscreants).
Are these claims the product of mental illness, or is that just a cover?
The most obvious explanation, that the claims made result from the
admitted mental illness of the author, is the one which the persecutors
intend be the one accepted without consideration being given to the
possibility of the claims being true. The persecutors have actually been
very clever about this, both in selecting as their target someone who was
known from school or university as being borderline schizophrenic, and in
ensuring the nature of their persecution corresponds to what often
features in the delusions of a schizophrenic.
The very first incident of the persecution occurred in June 1990, when I
was still a student at university in London. It consisted of a reaction
(giggling) from the newsreader, Sue Carpenter of ITN, to what she saw
happening in my living-room at my parents home where I was living. Before
your imagination gets the better of you I should make clear that what the
newsreader was reacting to was not too embarrassing in nature; my mother
had brought an apple for me into the the room, and Sue Carpenter found
this amusing.
I recognized that Carpenter had reacted to what she had seen in my
living-room, yet this idea still seemed completely fantastic to me. My
reaction was to continue watching television, particularly the news, to
see if this incident would be repeated. It was, many times, both on BBC
and ITV. An intelligent person would have thought to obtain a video
recorder and capture some of these incidents in order to try to explain to
an observer what he saw in these broadcasts. Unfortunately, I failed this
test of intelligence, since I did not record these programmes. I have
recently attempted to obtain from ITN tapes of their news programmes
dating back to summer 1990, but, unhappily, they have advised me that they
do not have complete programmes including newsreaders comments dating back
to that period.
From the outset, the persecutors structured their actions to ensure that
any complaint would be met with disbelief, and dismissed as
delusional. This is why they chose as their target someone who was known
at school and university to be borderline mentally ill; and it is why they
fired the first shots of their campaign through the broadcast
media. Schizophrenics commonly believe the media harass them; it would be
exceptional for "full-duplex television" to exist in reality. Those with
schizophrenia also commonly believe people are talking about them; again,
the persecutors have shown themselves very rarely, but act through
intermediaries, both in the workplace, and in public and during travel.
Mental illness is not the cause of these claims, but the simulation of its
symptoms is a cover used by the persecutors to deny their victim the
ability to have his compaints believed.
What evidence exists to support these claims of "interactive
television/radio";?
Quite frankly, I have very little evidence to support my claims. You may
examine the "Evidence" area of my website to see such evidence as I have
been able to gather. None of it is remotely conclusive. The "smoking
guns" all date back to 1990/91, and it is really rather late now to start
trying to look for material dating back seven or eight years. In 1997 I
started tape-recording every programme I watched or listened to. I also
started carrying with me a high-fidelity minidisc-recorder with good
quality microphone to catch incidents of public harassment, but this also
has not been as successful or conclusive as I had hoped.
Perhaps the best item in the "Evidence" section is the audio file "Life is
so hard" (it is labelled with Garfield the cartoon character on the site),
which I have given a certainty level of 100%. This item relates to
harassment at my workplace in Canada in 1996. A co-worker called Mark was
coming up with phrases and expressions which were repeating things being
said at my Canadian residence, consequently leading me to believe that my
apartment and home phone were bugged, and that the persecutors were
passing their gathered information on to Mark. On one particular evening I
said in my apartment, "life is so hard, and then you die". The following
day I was able to record Mark saying exactly the same phrase at work.
Unfortunately when "they" know you are recording them, they simply dont
say things which would unambiguously show harassment. When Mark the
co-worker knew he was being recorded, he only made his remarks out of
range of the recorder, for example outside the building. When the TV
newscasters or radio disc jockeys know they are being taped, they limit
themselves to saying things which are ambiguous, which even in my mind may
or may not be personally directed against me.
Who knows about this persecution?
Surprisingly many people know. People in the media, such as BBC and ITN
newscasters including Martyn Lewis and Michael Buerk, and radio disc
jockeys such as Chris Tarrant of Capital Radio, know what is going on, and
take part in it. Some co-workers at my former workplaces in England and
Canada have known about the harassment. Quite a few people in the general
public are also included. I believe the police are aware of the
persecution, but, unfortunately, have chosen not to take any action to
stop it. I have complained at my local police station in London several
years ago, and I have stated on the internet newsgroups that I have done
so, hence the police will be well aware of my wish to see the matter
resolved. I believe their inaction denotes a dereliction of duty, but
without good evidence, I am powerless to compel them to take steps to
prevent further harassment, or deal with what has already taken place.
What is the purpose of sending these faxes?
These faxes are being sent to three distinct groups of people, namely
Members of Parliament, the media, and diplomats & legal people. As you
will have observed I am making use of the email-to-fax gateway at Demon
Internet to send these faxes. I am forced to use this gateway since I
currently live in North America, and cannot afford the high cost of direct
phone calls to the UK.
My purpose in publicising my claims is firstly to discourage the
persecutors from continuing their campaign, and also to attempt to bring
their campaign out into the open, and thus perhaps identify the
persecutors. Neither aim has been achieved yet, but I hope that with
sufficient stimulation these aims may yet be accomplished.
The problem with the second aim is that those who read this article will
fall into two groups, those who dont know anything about the persecution
and consequently will disbelieve my claims as delusional, and those who do
know about the harassment and may have some idea of who is behind it, but
realise that if the harassers are exposed and the truth brought out into
the open, then powerful British institutions will substantially lose
prestige, and be exposed to ridicule.
It would give me hope to believe that these faxes will create a third
group of people, those who find out that I am telling the truth, and who
follow their consciences in standing up and seeing justice done. Only time
will tell if this hope will be realized.
5499
--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
|
| | Add comment |
|
| MI5 Persecution: Faxes Sent to Parliament1 (1149) Guest 09:36:47 |
| |
Faxes Sent to British Parliament logs
During the 1998-2000 period my records indicate that I sent at least 14,480 faxes to the British Parliament
in Westminster, of which 9,138 went via TPC's email-to-fax service and 5,342 were sent via fax-modem direct from
my computer. The actual figure is obviously much higher since, for most of this period, whenever a recipient asked to
be deleted from my mailing list, I totally wiped all entries including that from the logfile.
In the records "Y" indicates successful transmission from fax-modem, "N" indicates failed transmission from fax-modem.
"E" indicates an error occurred while transmitting via fax-modem and a fax may have been only partly transmitted.
"y" and "n" indicate success or failure via TPC.
In April 2000 I changed the method of operation by recording "R" when a recipient requested removal, rather than
wiping their details from my mailing list and records; and keeping "B" records for when TPC actioned a ban on a
recipient's fax-number, but the recipient did not write to ask me to cease faxing. The purpose of these changes
was to keep more accurate and complete records, but the intention was thwarted by the police complaint.
441712190076 nnnnnynnEnnnnnnYYNNYYYYNENNNNNynynnnnnnnnnNnnnnnnnn
441712190179 yyyynnyyyYnyyyyynYYYNYYYYYYEYEEEyyyyyyynyyyynyyyyy
441712190189 yyynyyyyyYyyyyyyyYYYEYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712190243 yyyyyyyyyYnnnnnnnYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYnynnnnnnnnnNnnnnnnnn
441712190246 ynnnyyyyyYnyyynyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYynyyyynyyyyyyyyyy
441712190253 yynnnnnnnNnnnnnnnNNNNNNNNENNYNNNnnnnnnnnnnnNnnynnnnn
441712190254 yyyyyyyyYnynynyyYYEEEYYEEYYEYEYyyynyynyynynyyyyyn
441712190266 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYEYYYYYNYYYyyynyyyynyyyyyyyyyy
441712190300 yyyyyyyynYyyyynnYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYnnyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712190301 yyyyyyyyyYnnyyyyYYYYYYYYENNYYYYnyyyynynyynyyynnnB
441712190305 yyynnynyYynnyynYYEYYYEEYYYYEYYynyynyyyynyNnyyynyyy
441712190309 ynyyyyyyYynynnYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712190317 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYNNYYYYYYYYYEyyynnnyyyyynynnnynn
441712190319 nyyyynnnNnnnnnnNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnNnnnnnnnn
441712190323 nyyyyyyYyyyyyyNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
441712190329 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYEYYYYYYYYYyyyyyynyyyyyyyyyyy
441712190331 ynyynnnnYyynnnnYYNYYYYYYNNYYYYynynnnnnnnnNnnnnnn
441712190332 nnynnynyYyyynyyYNYYYYYYYYYYYYYynynynnnnnnNnnnnnnn
441712190337 ynyyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYEYYEYYYYYYYyyyyyyynyyyyyyyyy
441712190350 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyyNNNNNNNNNNNYYYYynyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712190371 yyynnnnnNnynyyyYNNNNNYYNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
441712190390 yyyynyynYynyynyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyynnynyyyyyy
441712190409 nnyyyynyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYENYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyynnyyy
441712190438 yyynnnnnNyyynyyYYYYYYEYYYEYYYYyyynynyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712190446 yynnnnnnYyynynyYYYYYEYYYYEYYYYyyyyyyyyynyyyyyyyyn
441712190448 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYEYYEYYYyyyyyynnynnyyyyyyyy
441712190461 nynnnnyyYynnnnnYYYYYYYYYEYYEEYyyyynyyynynynnyyyyy
441712190475 yynnnnnnNnnnnnNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnNnnnnnnnn
441712190492 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyyEYYYYYYYYYYYYEYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712190495 ynnnnnnNyyyyyyYYEYYYYEYYYYYYEyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712190511 yyynnyynYynnnnnNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
441712190514 yyyyyyyyYnyynyyYYYNYYNYNEYYYYYyyyynynnnynyynnnnyy
441712190536 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYEYYEYYYYYEEYyyyyyynynnnYnnnnnnB
441712190559 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYEYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712190573 nyyyyyyyYyyynnnYYYYYYYYYYYYYYNnnyyyyyyyynnnnnyy
441712190598 nyyyyyyYynynyyYYYYYYEYYYYNNNNyyyynyyyyyyyyyynyy
441712190612 ynnnnyyyYnynnyyYYYYYYYYYYYEYYYyyyyynnynyyyyyyyyy
441712190620 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyyEYEYYYYYYYYYYYEyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyny
441712190622 yyyyyyyyYyynyyyYYYYYNYYNYYYYYYyyyyyyynyyyyyyyyyy
441712190628 yyyyyyyyYynyyyYYYYYYEYYYYEYYEyyyyynyynnNnnnnnnnnn
441712190638 yynnyyyyYnyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712190643 ynyyyyyYnynyyyYYYYYYYNYYYYYYYyynyyynyyyynnnnnB
441712190645 yyyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712190662 nynnnnnnYnnynnnNYNNYNYNNNNNYNNnnnnnnnnnnnNnnnnnnn
441712190663 nnnnnnnnYnnynyyNNNNNNENNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnNnnnnnnn
441712190664 nnnnnnnnYnnynnnNYNNYNYNYYNNYNYnnnyynnyynNnynnnnny
441712190682 yyyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYNYYnyyyyyynynyyynyyy
441712190685 ynyyyyyyYyyyynyYYYYYEYYYYNYEYYyyyyynyyyNnyyyynyyy
441712190696 yynnnyyEnnyyyYEYEYYYYEEEYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712190698 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyEYYYYNNNNNNNNNNnyynnyynyyynyyynnnnn
441712190770 yyyyyyyyYynnyyyYYYYYYEYYYYYYYYyyyyyyynyyyyynyynyy
441712190783 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYNEYYYyyyynyyyyyyNnyyyyyyy
441712190789 nnyyyynyYnnnnyyEYNYYYYEYENYYEEyyyyyyyynyyyynyyyyn
441712190790 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYnnnyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712190904 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyyYYEEYYYYEYYEYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712190912 yyyyyyyyYyynyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYEYynyynyyyyyyyyyynyyy
441712190913 yynyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYEENYYEYYYYYYyyyyynnyyyyyyyynyyy
441712190919 yynnnnnnYynnnnnNYYYEYNYYYEYYNEyyynnyyynyynnyyyny
441712190923 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYEYYYEYYYYYYyyyyyyynnyyyyyyyyyy
441712190926 yyyyyyyYynyyyyYYEENYYEYYEYYYYynyyyyyyyyyyyyynyyy
441712190928 yynyyyyyYnnnnnnNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
441712190931 yynynyyyYyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYNnnyyyyyyyyyNnnyyyyyy
441712190938 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyNYYYENYYNYNEEYYyyyynnnnnynNnnnnnnnn
441712190943 yyyyyyyyYynnnnYYYEYYYYYENNYEEnnyyynnynyyyyyyyyyyn
441712190946 ynyyyyyyYyynyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYEyynnnnnnnnynnnnnyn
441712190949 yyyyyyyyYynnyyYYEEEYYYNEYNYYYnyynnyyyyyyyyynnnB
441712190952 yyyyyyyYyyyyyYYYEYYYYYYYYEYYyyyyyyynyyyyyyyyyyy
441712190957 yyyyyyyYynnyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyynyyyn
441712190961 nyynnyyYynynyYEEYYYEYYYYYYYYyyyyyynnyyyyyyyynyn
441712190965 nnyynnnnYnnnnnYYYYYYYNYYYYYYYnynnnnnnyyNnyyyyyyy
441712190971 yyyyynyYynyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYNYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyynyy
441712190972 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712190976 nyynnynyYyynnnYYYEYYYYYYYEYYYyynnyyyyyyynnnnynyn
441712190978 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYEYEYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyB
441712190979 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712190981 ynyyyyyyYyyyyyYYEYYYYYEYYYYEYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712190986 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyYYYYYYYYYEYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyynyyy
441712190987 yyyynyyyYyyynyYYYYYYNYNNNNEYYynnnyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712190994 yyyyyyyyEyyyyyYYYYEEEYNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnNnnnnnnnn
441712191131 yyyynyyyEynnyyEYYEEEEYEEENEYYyyyyyyyyyyNnyyynyyy
441712191137 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYNYnyynyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712191145 nnynnyyyNnynnnnYYYYYNNNNNYYENNyyyynnnyyyNnnynnynn
441712191154 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyynynyyynyynyyyyyy
441712191158 ynnnnnnnYyynnnnYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYynnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
441712191161 yyyyyynyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712191162 yyyynyyyYnnnnnnYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyynyyyyyyy
441712191163 yyyyyyyyYynyynyYYYEYYYYYYYYYYEyyyyyyyyynyynyyyyynR
441712191174 ynnnnnynYyyynynYEYYYYYYYYYYNNNyyyyyyyyyyyyyyynyyyy
441712191177 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyynyyyyyyy
441712191179 nyyyyyyyYynyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyynyynnnynyyynynnn
441712191184 ynyyyyyyYynyyyyNNNNNYNYYYYYYNNyyynynynnyyyyyyyyn
441712191185 nyyyyyyyYnnnyyyYYYEYYYYYYYYEYYyynnnnnnyyynnnyyyny
441712191198 yyyyyyyyYnnyyyyEYYYYYEEYYYYYYYynyyyyyyynyynyyyny
441712191227 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyynyyyyyyNnnnyyyyny
441712191236 nnnnynynYnnnnnnNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
441712191263 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYNYYYYYNNNNYNyyynynynyyynnynynn
441712191268 yynyyyyyYnyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYnyyynnyyyyyNnyyyynyy
441712191279 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYEYYYYYYYEYyyyyyyyyynEnnnnnnB
441712191280 nnnnnnnnYnnnnnnNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnny
441712191395 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYEYYYYYYYYYYyyynnyyyyyyyyyyyyn
441712192008 yyyyyyyyYyyynnnYYNNENNNNNNNNNNnnyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712192031 yynyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyynyynyyyyyyyy
441712192051 yyyyyyyyYynnnnnYYYYYYYYNYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyynyn
441712192054 yyyyynyyYyyyyyyYEYEYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyynyyyyEnyyyyyny
441712192064 ynyyyyyyYyyynnnYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyynyyyyyyyyynn
441712192075 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyyYYEYYYYEYYYYNYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712192082 yyyyyyyyYynyyyyYYYYYYEEYYYYYNYyyyyyyynyyyyyyyynyy
441712192112 yyyyyyyyNyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYNNEYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712192117 ynyyyyyyNnynyyyYYNYYYYYYYNYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyynny
441712192130 ynnnnnnnYyynnnYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYynnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
441712192148 ynyyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyynyyynyyyyyyynyy
441712192170 yyyyyyyyYynnnnnNYYYYYYNYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyn
441712192212 yyyyyyyyYynnnnnNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnNnnynnnnn
441712192220 yyyyyyyyYynyyyyYYYYYYYEYYYNYYYyyyyyyyyynnyyyyyny
441712192221 ynyyynyyYyyynnnYYYYYEEEYYYNYYYyyynyyynyynyyyyyny
441712192233 yyynnyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYEEYEEYYYYYnnnyyyynyyynyynynyn
441712192252 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyyNYYYYYYYYYYNYEYyyynyyyyyyyyyyyyyny
441712192262 yynnnyyyYynnyyyNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
441712192269 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYEYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712192288 yyyynnnnEnnnnnnYEYYYENNNNNNNYEyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712192289 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYNYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyynyyynny
441712192302 yyynnyyyEnnyyyyEYYYYYNYYYYYYYYyyynynynnnyyynynnyn
441712192328 yyyyyyyyYyynyyyYNYYYYYEYYEYYYYyyynyyyyyynyyyyyyny
441712192329 yyyyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYEYYEnyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy | |
